Search

The use of blood-contaminated drug preparation equipment is believed to be associated with the transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) among injection drug users (IDUs), but the extent of HCV infection risk is unclear. The objective of this review was to appraise the evidence regarding HCV incidence associated with the use of drug preparation equipment such as drug mixing containers, filters and water. In June 2007, cohort and case–control studies examining the association of HCV incidence with the sharing of drug preparation equipment were identified by searching electronic reference databases as well as the reference lists of published papers. Ten studies (seven cohort and three nested case–control) met the inclusion criteria for the review. The relative risk of HCV infection associated with drug preparation equipment were mainly between 2.0 and 5.9; however, the precision of the estimates from individual studies were marked by wide confidence intervals. Few studies exist to allow an adequate assessment of the individual contributions of containers, filters and water to HCV incidence. The major methodological limitations of reviewed studies were short follow-up times, inadequate control of confounders and lack of exclusion of periods when IDUs were not at risk for HCV infection through drug injection. Current evidence implicating the association of drug preparation equipment with HCV incidence is limited by several methodological concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To determine whether antiplatelet agents are associated with endoscopic sphincterotomy-related haemorrhage as few well-controlled data exist on this controversial issue. Methods A case–control study in a tertiary care setting included cases with bleeding following endoscopic sphincterotomy, matched with 2–3 controls selected according to age ± 15 years, sex, and procedural date± 2 years. Cases and controls were compared for possible risk factors of postendoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding (presence of a coagulopathy and cholangitis). The main outcome measurement was the association between the use of antiplatelet medications and postendoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding after adjustment for possible confounding. Results The 40 cases [mean age 68 ± 17 (s.d.) years, 50% female] and 86 controls [68 ± 16 years, 50% female] were comparable except for differences noted in International Normalized Ratio (INR) (>2 in four cases vs. two controls), and pre-endoscopic sphincterotomy cholangitis (45% vs. 20%). Amongst cases, 13% were on aspirin and 3% on clopidogrel; 17% of controls took aspirin, and 4% a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. 53% of cases bled immediately; the remainder haemorrhaged at 2 ± 3 days. After adjustment for an elevated INR and cholangitis, exposure to antiplatelet agents was not significantly associated with procedure-related bleeding (odds ratio = 0.41, 95% CI [ 0.13; 1.31]). Conclusion This case–control study provides controlled data suggesting that antiplatelet agents do not significantly increase the risk of clinically-important bleeding related to endoscopic sphincterotomy. The low prevalences of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and clopidogrel use limit any definite conclusion on their elective use before endoscopic sphincterotomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Emotional reactions of couples were investigated during in vitro fertilization (IVF) at a private clinic in Sweden. The purpose was to compare such reactions between couples who obtained supernumerary embryos that could be cryopreserved and couples without such embryos.Methods: Forty women and men undergoing IVF treatment monitored individually their emotional reactions daily for one complete treatment cycle from the first day of down-regulation until the outcome of treatment was known. Ratings were extracted and analyzed from two separate days; the very first day of treatment and the day of embryo transfer.Results: The group of women (n=16; 40%) with supernumerary embryos suitable for cryopreservation reported a greater increase in optimism than the group (n=24; 60%) without such embryos (p=0.024). Correspondingly, women with supernumerary embryos reported less pessimism than women without such embryos (p=0.014). Among men there was no difference in optimism or pessimism between the groups. The women and men with supernumerary embryos did not differ in distress reactions compared to those women and men without such embryos. There was no correlation between optimism and distress on the day of embryo transfer in women; r=-0.167 and men; r=-0.135 respectively.Conclusion: The presence of frozen embryos increased optimistic and reduced pessimistic feelings about pregnancy among women undergoing IVF treatment. However, the couples' increased optimism on the day of embryo transfer did not seem to reduce their experience of distress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Couples' reasons for discarding supernumerary fertilized cryopreserved embryos and gender differences in attitudes toward the frozen embryos were investigated among Swedish couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) at a private clinic. At the time of the study Swedish law stipulated that couples could keep their frozen embryos for a maximum of one year, with the possibility of an extension based on individual requests.Methods: A questionnaire with structured and unstructured questions was sent to 124 women and 124 men who had entered the IVF treatment and obtained supernumerary embryos from 1 January 1994 to 1 March 1995. Eighty-two women and 74 men completed the questionnaire.Results: After a mean storage time of 25.3 (+/-11.0) months 22 (26.8%) of the responding couples had their embryos discarded. The reasons were mainly practical, such as a positive outcome of IVF and a legally too short storage time. Comparisons between women and men showed that fewer women (13;17.6%) than men (20;27%) had been uncertain during the IVF treatment about using the frozen embryos at a later date and that men more often than women expressed anxieties about possible effects of the freezing procedure on the potential child (p=0.009).Conclusion: A positive outcome of the original IVF treatment and a short maximum legal time of cryopreservation were the most common reasons why couples discarded their embryos. The men more often than women expressed anxieties about possible effects on a potential child. The results emphasize the need for giving detailed information to the couples about cryopreserved embryos and children born by this method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]