1. Dietary assessment among women with overweight and obesity in early postpartum.
- Author
-
Huseinovic, E., Winkvist, A., Bertz, F., Hellebö Johansson, E., and Brekke, H. K.
- Subjects
CLINICAL trials ,HEALTH promotion ,INTERVIEWING ,NUTRITIONAL assessment ,OBESITY ,PROBABILITY theory ,PUERPERIUM ,RESEARCH funding ,STATISTICAL sampling ,SELF-evaluation ,STATISTICS ,T-test (Statistics) ,TELEPHONES ,WEIGHT loss ,WOMEN'S health ,DATA analysis ,BODY mass index ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CROSS-sectional method ,FOOD diaries ,DATA analysis software ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Background The present study aimed to assess dietary intake and evaluate the degree of agreement of group-level dietary intake as measured by 24-h recall against a 4-day diet record among postpartum women with overweight and obesity. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted of 110 Swedish women with a body mass index of ≥27 kg m
−2 at 6-15 weeks postpartum who were recruited to a weight loss trial and randomised to diet intervention or control. One 24-h recall was conducted among all women prior to randomisation. In addition, women subsequently randomised to diet intervention also conducted a 4-day diet record before receiving dietary treatment ( n = 54). Paired tests were used to evaluate agreement of group-level dietary intake as measured by 24-h recall against 4-day diet record among women randomised to diet intervention. Results Women reported a median (25th and 75th percentiles) energy intake of 9.1 (6.9, 11.7) MJ day−1 and an intake of fibre, vitamin D, folate and iron below the recommended intake as assessed by 24-h recall prior to randomisation ( n = 110). Group-level median intakes of energy (9.9 versus 10.0 MJ day−1 ), fibre (21.9 versus 21.3 g day−1 ), vitamin D (4.8 versus 6.5 μg day−1 ), folate (296 versus 287 μg day−1 ), iron (11.0 versus 11.3 mg day−1 ) and calcium (915 versus 968 mg day−1 ) did not differ significantly between the methods; however, the record captured a higher energy-adjusted intake of fat, saturated fat and alcohol, as well as a lower intake of carbohydrates, compared to the recall ( n = 54). Conclusions We found no difference in group-level estimates of energy or micronutrients between the recall and the record; however, there were some differences for macronutrients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF