Search

Aims: To investigate the decline of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non‐VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Methods: Multicentre prospective cohort study including 1667 patients with nonvalvular AF. The eGFR was assessed by the CKD‐EPI formula at baseline and during follow‐up. The primary endpoint of the study was the median annual decline of eGFR according to VKA (n = 743) or NOAC (n = 924) use. As secondary endpoints, we analysed the transition to eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the eGFR class worsening. Results: Median age was 73.7 ± 9.1 years and 43.3% were women. VKA‐treated patients showed an eGFR decline of −2.11 (interquartile range [IQR] –5.68/−0.62), which was −0.27 (IQR –9.00/4.54, P < 0.001 vs VKAs), −1.21 (IQR –9.98/4.02, P = 0.004 vs VKAs) and −1.32 (IQR –8.70/3.99, P = 0.003 vs VKAs) in patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, respectively. Transition to eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m2 was lower in dabigatran‐ and apixaban‐treated patients: odds ratio (OR) 0.492, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.298‐0.813, P = 0.006 and OR 0.449, 95% CI 0.276‐0.728, P = 0.001, respectively. A lower rate of eGFR class worsening was found in all groups of NOACs compared to VKAs. No difference between full and reduced dose of NOAC was found. Subgroup analysis showed that the association between NOAC and eGFR changes was markedly reduced in diabetic patients. Conclusion: Patients prescribed NOACs showed a lower decline of renal function compared to those prescribed VKAs. This effect was partially lost in patients with diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Recently, NICE guidelines recommend the use of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) as the first line of investigation for new onset chest pain. We sought to evaluate the impact of the integration of CTA in the diagnostic workup, as either a first- or second-line of investigation, in the clinical practice for patients presenting with new onset chest pain, with suspicion that it may be due to coronary artery disease (CAD). Method and Results. From 2014 to 2016, 208 outpatients (mean age 63.8 ± 12.7, 37% female) with an unknown CAD diagnosis were evaluated. About half (n=106, 51%) received usual testing care plus CTA as a second-line investigation (group A), while the other half (n=102, 49%) received CTA as a first-line investigation (group B). Care decisions and test interpretations were made by the attending physician. Obstructive CAD (O-CAD) was defined as >50% stenosis in the principal branch. As determined by CTA, the rates of CAD in group A vs. group B were the following (P=0.001): 31.1% vs. 27.4% for normal/minimal CAD; 42.5% vs. 63.7% for no O-CAD; and 26.4% vs. 8.8% with O-CAD. Based on a diagnostic result of no O-CAD, invasive angiography was cancelled in 42.6% (n=45) of group A patients, and additional functional tests were cancelled for the same reason in 63.7% (n=65) of group B patients, without adverse events at median 3-year. The average diagnostic cost for patients in our study was lower in group B (206 vs. 324.42 euro; P<0.0001). Conclusions. In clinical practice, CTA, as a first- or second-line investigation, most commonly detected no O-CAD in new onset chest pain patients, leading us to safely avoid unnecessary ICA or additional functional tests. The use of CTA as a first-line investigation also appears to be cost saving, but its cost-effectiveness remains to be demonstrated in larger studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]