Search

1. Butylamino-phenoxy-propanol-acetate (BPPA) is a new topical oculoselective beta-adrenoceptor blocker for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) in man. Its potency on the airways of normal subjects was identical with that of placebo. A study was carried out to determine the potential of BPPA to cause bronchoconstriction in mild asthmatics (FEV1 greater than or equal to 60% predicted) with normal IOP. 2. Twelve nonsmoking outpatients who bronchoconstricted to 0.25 or 0.50% of timolol eye drops (fall in FEV1 23.33 +/- 1.20% (mean +/- s.e. mean), range 16-30) were investigated in this double-masked, randomized, 3-period, crossover study. On three different occasions six incremental concentrations of BPPA (range: 0.1-2%; maximum cumulative concentration 4%), timolol (0.1-1%; 2%), and placebo were administered bilaterally until bronchoconstriction (decrease in FEV1 greater than or equal to 20% and in specific airway conductance (sGaw) greater than or equal to 35% simultaneously) or the maximum cumulative concentration was reached. 3. Airway response was measured as change in FEV1 and sGaw and dose-response curves to timolol, BPPA and placebo were performed. IOP was measured 3 h after the highest concentration of each study day. 4. Timolol caused dose-dependent falls in FEV1 and sGaw as well as clinical symptoms of respiratory distress in all subjects. The median cumulative concentrations of timolol required to decrease FEV1 by 20% and sGaw by 35% were 0.98% and 1.53%. Neither placebo (P greater than 0.05) nor BPPA (P greater than 0.05) caused a significant change in sGaw. A fall in FEV1 by 20% not accompanied by a simultaneous fall in sGaw by 35% was found in four subjects following BPPA and in five subjects following placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To investigate the effect of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, benazepril, on pulmonary function., Methods: We investigated the influence of benazepril, on lung function and the interaction with inhaled salbutamol (0.1 to 6.6 mg) and histamine (0.03 to 30.69 g l-1) in normal subjects. Benazepril 20 mg, salbutamol 8 mg, propranolol 160 mg, and placebo were given orally once daily over 10 days., Results: On day 8, there was no difference in the area under the salbutamol dose-response curves between benazepril, placebo and oral salbutamol (P > 0.05), propranolol shifted the curves to the right (P < 0.05). On day 10, histamine challenge resulted in following PD35sGaw values (geometric mean and 95% CI): with placebo 1.02 (0.95-1.09) g l-1, benazepril 1.04 (0.99-1.08), salbutamol 1.19 (1.13-1.25), propranolol 0.57 (0.50-0.65)., Conclusions: Benazepril had no influence on baseline lung function, caused no interaction with inhaled salbutamol and the bronchial response to histamine was similar to placebo. However, our findings in normal subjects cannot be extrapolated automatically to asthmatics.

1. The airway and tremor response and cardiovascular and hypokalaemic effects of single and cumulative doses of fenoterol given by dry powder capsules (DPC) and by metered dose inhaler (MDI) were studied in asthmatics in two randomized, crossover trials. 2. Single doses of fenoterol DPC and MDI (0.2 mg, 0.4 mg), investigated in 24 subjects, produced similar, dose-dependent increases in FEV1. Fenoterol DPC caused less tremor response and less hypokalaemic effects than fenoterol MDI. 3. Cumulative doses of fenoterol DPC and MDI (0.2, 0.6, 1.4, 3.0, 6.2 mg), investigated in 12 subjects, produced a comparable bronchodilatation (mean maximum increase in FEV1 was 0.53 +/- 0.06/0.52 +/- 0.081 for DPC/MDI) and a similar, dose-dependent rise in heart rate (35 +/- 3.81/41 +/- 2.25 beats min(-1)). The rise in tremor and the fall in plasma potassium were smaller after DPC than after MDI. The mean maximum changes were 51.58 +/- 6.41/95.83 +/- 6.75 cm s(-2) for tremor and -0.68 +/- 0.09/-0.96 +/- 0.10 mmol l(-1) for potassium. 4. Our findings may result from a difference in the pharmacokinetics of the dry powder and the aerosol formulation, particularly differences in distribution and absorption. 5. In conclusion, fenoterol DPC used in low therapeutic doses (0.2,0.4 mg), is preferable to the MDI. Fenoterol DPC used as rescue medication in high cumulative doses, do not suggest a greater safety margin than the MDI and the same restrictions should be considered for the fenoterol dry powder formulation as suggested for the MDI.