1. Bloodstream infection rates in Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal people in Central Australia, 2014–2018.
- Author
-
Coe, Alice, Woodman, Richard J, Baird, Rob, and Einsiedel, Lloyd
- Abstract
Bloodstream infection rates in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people in Central Australia, 2014-2018 Methicillin-resistant I S. aureus i was isolated from 53 of 110 people with I S. aureus i bloodstream infections (48%), including 46 of 81 infections in Aboriginal people (57%); these proportions were substantially larger than earlier reports (for Aboriginal people: 28%[1] or 29%[4]; non-Aboriginal people: 5%[1] or 6%[4]). Keywords: Bacterial infections; Indigenous health; Drug resistance, microbial; Population health EN Bacterial infections Indigenous health Drug resistance, microbial Population health 415 417 3 05/17/23 20230515 NES 230515 Bloodstream infection rates are an indirect measure of social disadvantage and population health.[1] Rates of chronic disease and harmful alcohol consumption are higher among socio-economically disadvantaged people, who often live in overcrowded houses with poor sanitation; all these factors are recognised risk factors for bloodstream infections.[2] Thirty-four percent of the disparity in health outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians is attributed to high levels of unemployment, lower educational attainment and household income, and inadequate housing, and a further 19% to health risk factors, including alcohol consumption and smoking.[3] Two estimates of mean annual bloodstream infection incidence in the Alice Springs area at the start of the 21st century were much higher for Aboriginal than non-Aboriginal people (2001-2006: 937 I v i 64 per 100 000 person-years[1]; 2001-2005: 1355 I v i 70 per 100 000 person-years[4]). [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF