1. Early salvage radiotherapy in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Its impact and optimal candidate.
- Author
-
Tomita, Natsuo, Uchiyama, Kaoru, Mizuno, Tomoki, Imai, Mikiko, Sugie, Chikao, Ayakawa, Shiho, Niwa, Masanari, Matsui, Tooru, Otsuka, Shinya, Manabe, Yoshihiko, Nomura, Kento, Kondo, Takuhito, Kosaki, Katsura, Miyakawa, Akifumi, Miyamoto, Akihiko, Takemoto, Shinya, Yasui, Takahiro, and Shibamoto, Yuta
- Subjects
PROSTATECTOMY ,GLEASON grading system ,SURGICAL site ,RADIOTHERAPY ,MULTIVARIATE analysis - Abstract
Aim: We aimed to identify the optimal candidates for early salvage radiotherapy (SRT) among patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: This multi‐institutional retrospective study included 371 patients treated using SRT after RP. The median (range) PSA level at BCR was 0.36 (0.10‐2.00) ng/mL. The association between early SRT (ie, starting PSA level < 0.50) and BCR after SRT was tested in each subgroup according to our own risk stratification. Results: The median follow‐up time was 51 months. By multivariate analysis, pT3b, Gleason score ≥ 8, negative surgical margins, PSA doubling time < 6 months, and non‐early SRT were associated with BCR after SRT. Patients were stratified by four risk factors other than non‐early SRT: (1) low risk (0 risk factor), (2) intermediate risk (1 risk factor), and (3) high risk (≥2 risk factors). The BCR‐free survival was higher in the early SRT group than the nonearly SRT group in the high‐risk subgroup (P = 0.020), whereas that was similar between two groups in the low‐risk and intermediate‐risk subgroups (P =.79 and.18, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that early SRT was beneficial for the high‐risk subgroup (P =.032), whereas early SRT was not associated with improved outcomes in the low‐risk and intermediate‐risk subgroups (P =.92 and 1.0, respectively). Conclusions: This study suggested that early SRT seemed to contribute to better biochemical control for patients with more adverse features, whereas no benefit was observed in men with no adverse features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF