Search

Aortic valve replacement is the treatment of choice for elderly patients with aortic stenosis. It can be accomplished with excellent immediate and long-term results with significant functional improvement. Unfortunately, the literature is replete with enthusiastic reports of aortic catheter balloon valvotomy. Initial findings were controversial and the long-term results have been poor due to early valve restenosis. A retrospective analysis of our surgical experience with aortic valve replacement in the elderly seems appropriate in an effort to put this issue in proper perspective. From January 1973 to June 1993, 200 consecutive patients 70 years of age and older with severe aortic stenosis underwent surgical correction. There were 105 men (52.5%) and 95 women (47.5%), with a mean age of 76.2 years (range 70 to 89). Preoperatively, 195 patients (97.5%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV. Over one half (61.0%) of the patients experienced no hospital complications. The hospital mortality was 9.0% (18 patients). This included 14 patients in NYHA Class IV. The mean follow-up was 69.3 months and ranged from 1 to 215 months. The actuarial survival for 182 patients discharged from the hospital was 70.8% +/- 4.0% (SEM) at 72 months (73 patients at risk) and 35.2% +/- 5.4% at 144 months (20 patients at risk). Considering the advanced age and preoperative functional classification in this patient group, the results of aortic valve replacement have been excellent. The survival of patients discharged from the hospital compares favorably with a normal population matched for age and sex. The results of aortic balloon valvotomy have been disappointing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

One hundred sixty-nine consecutive patients with coronary artery disease and mitral valve pathology operated during the past 5 years were reviewed (98% follow-up). Eighty-seven patients underwent mitral valve repair and 82 mitral valve replacement with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (number of AV grafts = 3). An analysis of these patients (age range 48 to 92 [mean 69]) and a classification based on anatomic pathology of the mitral apparatus is presented. Flexible ring annuloplasty was utilized in all repairs and chordal-sparing techniques in all valve replacements. There was equal mortality for replacement and repair in this subset of high risk patients. Structural valve dysfunction of repaired valves was more common (5/81 [6.0]) than primary tissue valve failure after mitral valve replacement (0 patients).

The problem of early onset aortic insufficiency as seen with the scalloped, subcoronary homograft aortic valve replacement is reduced with the use of a total root replacement. In addition, the naturally competent aortic root is more durable. From September 1985 to April 1991, 26 consecutive patients underwent aortic root replacement with 10 autografts, 14 homografts, and 2 xenografts using a modified implantation method. Twenty-five patients were discharged from the hospital. This partial inclusion root technique for implanting unstented valves in the aortic position decreases the probability of early failure secondary to technical malalignment at the time of implantation. In contrast to total root replacement, it avoids the need to destroy the recipient aortic root. A longitudinal aortotomy is performed to the aortic annulus in the mid-portion of the noncoronary sinus. The proximal suture line is interrupted with the valve oriented in the anatomical position. Circumferential running monofilament side-to-side anastomoses approximate the donor coronary ostia to the recipient. A running medial and lateral posterior suture line to the lateral superior portions of the aortotomy completes the integrity of the anterior wall of the implantation. One autograft attempt failed and one homograft patient died postoperatively. Follow-up ranges from 1 to 6 years in 24 patients. Postoperative aortic insufficiency was significant in one case due to inappropriate sizing of the proximal aortic suture line. There has been no evidence of progressive aortic insufficiency detected by the early onset of diastolic murmurs or echocardiograms as was our previous experience with the scalloped subcoronary method.

Since January 8, 1985, three different designs of unstented (type A, n = 9) and partial stented (type B, n = 4; and type C, n = 3) glutaraldehyde preserved porcine aortic valves were used for aortic valve replacement in 16 patients with acquired aortic valve lesions. Type A and type B prostheses were implanted using a two suture row technique. In type C prostheses, only a single suture row was necessary for implantation, facilitating surgery considerably. In all patients, the fully flexible commissures of the bioprostheses were secured to the aortic wall of the recipient. There was no hospital mortality. Two patients with type A bioprostheses died due to noncardiac causes, 4 and 24 months postoperatively. One bioprosthesis in this group had to be replaced after 3 months because of insufficiency. Serial Doppler echocardiographic studies were performed up to 6 years after implantation. No significant leaflet calcification was observed. In three type A bioprostheses, a mild insufficiency without progression was recorded. The latest mean/peak transprosthetic pressure gradients were: type A: 6 +/- 4 mmHg/12 +/- 6 mmHg; type B: 6 +/- 3 mmHg/14 +/- 5 mmHg; and type C: 11 +/- 5 mmHg/18 +/- 8 mmHg. The functional results of the type A and type B bioprostheses have proven to be satisfactory. The slightly higher pressure gradients in patients with a type C bioprosthesis give rise to further refinements of its design. These results confirm the usefulness of imitating normal anatomy by using unstented or partial stented bioprostheses.

With an increasing number of elderly patients requiring cardiac valve surgery, the topic of bioprosthetic durability becomes critically important. Previous reports have shown expected survival of bioprosthetic valves to be in excess of 95% at 9 years. However, primary tissue failure appears to accelerate at the end of the first decade and there is limited data into the second decade. With this in mind, we proceeded to analyze all bioprosthetic valves implanted in patients 70 years of age and older. From September 1974 to December 1990, 781 patients underwent valve replacement using a bioprosthesis. Ages ranged from 70 to 88 years with a mean of 75.1. There were 423 males (54.2%) and 358 females (45.8%). Preoperatively, 99.0% of the patients were in either New York Heart Association functional Class III or IV. Fifty-nine patients (7.6%) were done as emergencies. Six hundred ninety-four patients left the hospital (30-day overall mortality 11.1%). In this cohort, there were 733 valves at risk. Follow-up extended from 1 to 186.0 months with a mean of 52.9, which resulted in 3,059.9 patient-years of cumulative follow-up. Bioprosthetic Survival: A total of 23 valves failed in the series; 15 primary tissue failures, seven from endocarditis, and one perivalvular leak. Actuarial survival at 7 years was 94.5% +/- 1.4% standard error of the mean (SEM; 168 valves at risk) and at 13 years, 83.7% +/- 4.8% SEM (11 valves at risk). This analysis provides further documentation of the long-term favorable durability of the bioprosthesis when utilized in patients 70 years of age and over.

Stent mounting of homograft valves was first reported by our group in 1968. Since then, there has been question as to whether or not stent mounting of bioprostheses adversely affects the incidence of structural deterioration in aortic valve replacement. Between November 1967 and July 1988, 571 consecutive patients underwent valve replacement with a stented or unstented homograft. There were 351 men (61.5%) and 220 women (38.5%). The mean age of the group was 49.2 years (range 18 to 79 years). Five hundred thirty-four patients left the hospital (30-day overall mortality 6.5%). Follow-up extends from 6 months to 22 years with a mean of 7.6 years. The cumulative follow-up for the series was 4,095.9 patient-years. Hospital mortality, early technical failure, and prosthetic valve endocarditis were considered censoring events and excluded from this study. Actuarial analysis revealed a significant difference (p less than 0.02) in the freedom from structural valve deterioration for unstented and stended isolated aortic valve replacement. Age (50 and under, and over 50) does not appear to be a factor in structural deterioration in unstented homografts but does influence the rate of failure in stented homografts (p less than 0.05). These results clearly indicate that stent mounting adversely affects tissue valve durability with aortic valve replacement. Moreover, age correlates with structural deterioration if valves are stented and does not if they are unstented. Based on these results, the use of unstented bioprostheses should be reevaluated, along with the design of porcine valve stents.

Since September, 1985, 20 patients have undergone implantation of a homograft valve in the pulmonary position (16 pulmonary, 4 aortic). There were 11 primary operations and 9 reoperations. In 7 of 11 primary operations the homograft valve was utilized as a composite conduit with a short Dacron extension. In four of five reoperations for a failed porcine valved conduit, a composite homograft conduit was used. Four patients underwent implantation of a free homograft in a previously repaired right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). Age ranged from 15 days to 22 years. There was one operative death (5%), a seven-week-old infant with truncus arteriosus. Long-term follow-up ranges from 1 to 30 months. Clinical performance has been satisfactory in 18 of 19 patients. One patient undergoing free implantation of a pulmonary valve in the RVOT required replacement at 18 months with a porcine valve. In this patient, pulmonary insufficiency was caused by distortion of the annulus secondary to dilatation and pulmonary hypertension. Nine of 18 survivors do not require medication. Eleven of 18 have trivial to mild pulmonary insufficiency murmurs without symptomatology. The homograft valve is extremely useful in reconstruction of the right heart, however, early insufficiency murmurs have been noted. Distortion of the valve annulus may contribute to the early onset of a benign insufficiency murmur. Residual distal obstruction or pulmonary hypertension may be a contraindication to the use of a free homograft in the orthotopic position.

The Hancock II bioprosthesis was developed in order to provide the advantageous low pressure fixation, improved delrin stent design, and anticalcification treatment. These changes were made 6 years ago after 10 years of experience with the high pressure fixed rigid implantation ring and polypropylene stent used in the Hancock I valve. In 1983, based on our own experience with low pressure fixed valves in 76 patients, we began early clinical trials with the Hancock II valve. All valves were studied postoperatively by intraoperative catheterization and followed up with postoperative echocardiograms for measurement of valve gradients and areas. This series of 104 patients with Hancock II valves was then compared retrospectively with 119 patients receiving Hancock I valves from 1975 to 1983. A comparison of mortality, thromboembolism, and hemorrhage rates was not significantly different between groups and the valve failure incidence of Hancock I valves was an anticipated 2.34% per patient-year. There has been one primary tissue failure in the Hancock II series. This patient had fibrinous excrescences on the outflow surface of the valve in the aortic position. These nodules were compatible with an old thrombotic process of ill-defined nature. Further investigation resulted in reports of this phenomenon, which had resulted in early valve stenosis, from other centers implanting the Hancock II valve. In conclusion, the Hancock II bioprosthesis has theoretical advantages over the Hancock I in stent design, fixation pressure, and anticalcification potential. There is an unusual thrombotic process in aortic valve replacements that we have not observed in the Hancock I group or in our experience with other porcine xenografts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Six patients with tetralogy of Fallot, pulmonary atresia, or absent pulmonary valve syndrome were operated with a RVOT patch containing a single aortic allograft cusp from an adult donor. The method was based on animal work with similar patches implanted in growing puppies and proved that the single cusp functioned as an effective RV outflow valve for several weeks after surgery. Postoperative angiograms in the animals confirmed nearly completely competent valves. Sacrifice of animals at 3 months documented that the allograft tissue was flexible without early deterioration or calcification. Clinical application of this method raised several questions regarding the procedure, its efficacy, and subsequent fate of the allograft valve in children requiring RVOT reconstruction. There were six children age 19 months to 10 years who required division of the pulmonary valve annulus to relieve pulmonary outflow obstruction or with absent pulmonary valve syndrome and compromised airways from pulmonary insufficiency. One patient had a positive culture from the valve and required immediate removal of the infected allograft. Patients had clinically competent pulmonary valves immediately after surgery with decreased right ventricular systolic and end-diastolic pressures when compared with patients in whom nonvalve patches were inserted. All patients had some degree of pulmonary insufficiency, but no symptoms. Follow-up up of five patients available 4 to 6 years after surgery revealed no patients with stenosis of the valve cusps, although two patients have severe, one moderate, and two mild pulmonary insufficiency. We conclude that a patch containing a single adult allograft valve cusp should be considered for all patients requiring reconstruction of the RVOT, particularly if RV overload is expected to compromise the immediate postoperative result.