Search

This is the first of two papers reporting community forensic mental health nurses' experiences of restriction orders and supervised discharge mechanisms. Service user/nurse relationships and risk are addressed in this initial paper. A mixed method/approach was used. A piloted 15-item questionnaire sought quantitative and qualitative data from 122 nurses throughout England and Wales; 57 questionnaires were returned. Limitations applying to gaining qualitative data via written questionnaire are overtly acknowledged. Quantitative data were analysed using the SPSS program. Content analysis and reflexive appraisal of qualitative data led to production of critically appraised conclusions. Findings are illustrative of complexity. Increased understanding of relevant issues, rather than definitive conclusions, is claimed as an outcome. Reductionist approaches are insufficient in illustrating relevant complexities; nurses offer considered, contextualized responses; diametrically opposed opinions exist about the value of interpersonal relationships and balances between care, control and risk assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is the second of two papers reporting on a descriptive mixed methods study of community forensic mental health nurses' experiences of restriction orders and supervised discharge mechanisms. Forensic community mental health nurses (FCMHNs) have a body of experience of working with mentally disordered offenders in the community. A number of these patients will be subject to conditions on discharge. This in effect acts as compulsory community treatment with the sanction of recall to hospital. This paper examines nurses' perceptions of team-working, legal powers and their effects upon compliance. Findings include that FCMHNs express general satisfaction with their input to decision-making but some concerns were raised that challenge the ethic of team-working. Respondents were broadly in favour of increased professional responsibility, although this may be related to a quest for status. A pragmatic if equivocal support for the use of compulsion in community mental healthcare was also expressed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. Supporting Offenders through Restoration Inside (SORI) is a programme that aims to: increase victim empathy in offenders; motivate offenders to change their offending behaviour; and to take personal responsibility for the harm that he has caused. A 5-day course based on the SORI principles has been piloted across seven prison sites in the UK. The aim of the study reported here was to evaluate the effectiveness of the programme across these sites. Methods. Three psychometric questionnaires [Victim Concerns, Locus of Control, and Stages of Change (SoC) scales] were administered to the participants immediately before and after the programme had taken place (data were available for 131 participants for the Victim Concern Scale, 82 participants for the Locus of Control measure, and 96 participants for the SoC questionnaire). These psychometric measures were the primary research outcome. Statistical analyses were employed to assess whether any changes had been effected by the programme. Results. The results of this study found that: participants had an enhanced victim concern for all types of victims, were more motivated to change their offending behaviours, and were more willing to take responsibility for their actions, after completion of the course. No change was found in terms of participants seeing themselves as being more in control of their actions/environment. Conclusions. The results lend support for the notion that the 5-day SORI course is effective in increasing participants' levels of victim concern and motivation to change, while not really impacting upon levels of ownership for one's ownership for one's actions. Suggestions for future research and limitations of the study are discussed in the paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]