Search

Richard Kirkendall's collection of essays, The Organization of American Historians and the Writing and Teaching of American History, examines the history of the Organization of American Historians (OAH) from its founding to the present, using that history to illuminate how the writing of American history has changed over the last hundred years. The book provides coverage of all the major dimensions of the Mississippi Valley Historical Association's (MVHA) and the OAH's activities, ranging from the work of its scholarly publications, the Mississippi Historical Valley Review and the Journal of American History, to its role in promoting the teaching of American history. Overall, the essays in the volume tell a story of the organization's progress toward greater inclusion and democracy, falling prey to a Whig interpretation of historiography. In doing so, the book is part of a larger tendency in the way that historians have approached historiography, which in turn reflects their ambivalence about their relationship to the historical process. Thus, even as the very enterprise of historiography is premised on the recognition of how historians are themselves the products of the historical process, historians have revealed the limits to that recognition in their approach to the subject. This essay shows how deeply rooted this duality has been in the study of American historiography and illuminates some of its sources by placing Kirkendall's book in the context of how the MVHA and the OAH have treated historiography over the course of the organization's history. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The review argues that, while Fish's book is undoubtedly a corrective to the most extreme examples of polemical teaching, it oversimplifies the difficulties academics face in trying to create sharp distinctions between politics and scholarship. The radical disconnection he advocates does not address the most difficult situations in which lines cannot be clearly drawn between the substance of academic research and teaching and the politics of the process of knowledge production itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reviews the book "THE ETHICS OF HISTORY," edited by David Carr, Thomas Flynn and Rudolf A. Makkreel.

Reviews the book "Sublime Historical Experience," by F. R. Ankersmit.

Reviews the book 'The Philosophy of History Teaching. History and Theory, Beiheft 22.'

The article reviews the book "Toronto Sprawls: A History," by Lawrence Solomon.

The article reviews the book "BIG HISTORY: FROM THE BIG BANG TO THE PRESENT," by Cynthia Stokes Brown.

The article reviews the book "Our History Is Still Being Written: The Story of Three Chinese-Cuban Generals in the Cuban Revolution," by Armando Choy, Gustavo Chui, Moisés Sío Wong, and Mary-Alice Waters.

The article reviews the book "Telling Children About the Past: An Interdisciplinary Perspective," by Nena Galanidou and Liv Helga Dommasnes.

The article reviews the book "Lincoln's America 1809-1865," edited by Joseph R. Forneri and Sara Vaughn Gabbard.

The article reviews the book "Meaning and Representation in History," edited by Jörn Rüsen.

Reviews the non-fiction book 'The Inventions of History. Essays on the Representation of the Past,' by Stephen Bann.

The article reviews the book "Lincoln and His Admirals," by Craig L. Symonds.

The article reviews the book "Editing Early Modern Texts: An Introduction to Principles and Practice," by Michael Hunter.

Reviews the book 'Historical Studies and Literary Criticism,' by Jerome J. McGann.