Search

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) involves a chronic immune-mediated response to dietary antigens. Recent work identifies T-cell clonality in children with EoE, however, it is unknown whether this is true in adults or whether there is a restricted food-specific T-cell repertoire. We sought to confirm T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality in EoE and assess for differences with specific food triggers., Methods: Bulk TCR sequencing was performed on mRNA isolated from esophageal biopsies obtained from adults and children with EoE (n = 15) who had food triggers confirmed by endoscopic evaluation. Non-EoE adult and pediatric controls (n = 10) were included. Differences in TCR clonality by disease and treatment status were assessed. Shared and similar V-J-CDR3s were assessed based on specific food triggers., Results: Active EoE biopsies from children but not adults displayed decreased unique TCRα/β clonotypes and increased relative abundance of TCRs comprising >1% of the total compared to non-EoE controls and paired inactive EoE samples. Among patients in which baseline, post diet elimination, and food trigger reintroduction samples (n = 6) were obtained, we observed ~1% of TCRs were shared only between pre-diet elimination and trigger reintroduction. Patients with a shared EoE trigger (milk) had a greater degree of shared and similar TCRs compared to patients with differing triggers (seafood, wheat, egg, soy)., Conclusion: We confirmed relative clonality in children but not adults with active EoE and identified potential food-specific TCRs, particularly for milk-triggered EoE. Further studies are needed to better identify the broad TCR repertoire relevant to food triggers., (© 2023 The Authors. Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

This article provides a summary of a Cochrane review on the medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). EoE is a chronic inflammatory condition of the esophagus that can affect individuals of all ages, but is more common in males and adults. The review evaluated the efficacy and safety of different medical interventions for EoE, including corticosteroids and biologics. The findings suggest that corticosteroids improve clinical and histological outcomes, while biologics may improve clinical outcomes. However, the cost and availability of biologics should be considered. Further research and cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to fully evaluate and compare these treatments. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an inflammatory disease of the esophagus, producing failure to thrive in infants and dysphagia with food impaction in older children and adults. Although most people with EoE manifest atopic/allergic disease, the specific allergens to which immunoglobulin E (IgE) is directed, if any, have not yet been characterized. Methods: Mucosal brush biopsy (MBB) and solid tissue biopsy (STB) specimens were prospectively obtained from 25 individuals with dysphagia and suspicion of EoE. Specific IgE (sIgE) against 112 epitopes from airborne and food proteins, antigens known to cause a polyclonal IgE response and IgG4 to food allergens, were measured. Results: There was no difference in total IgE harvested between the 2 biopsy methods (p > 0.05) or between the EoE‐positive (N = 12) and EoE‐negative (N = 13) groups (p > 0.05). None of the samples in either group contained measurable serum IgE to any of the airborne or food proteins tested, but low levels of IgE specific to Candida and Staphylococcus enterotoxins were detected. Low levels of IgG4 specific to wheat, soy, peanut, and egg were also detected. Conclusions: Both MBB and STB are able to harvest measureable levels of IgE and IgG4 from the esophageal mucosa. Low levels of serum‐specific IgE suggest that other inflammatory mechanisms, besides type I, IgE‐mediated, allergen‐specific hypersensitivity, may act as the primary catalyst for mucosal eosinophilia. Clarifying the role of both IgE‐mediated and non‒IgE‐mediated inflammatory mechanisms will help identify more targeted diagnostic and treatment strategies for individuals who present with dysphagia and esophageal eosinophilia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The pathogenesis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is currently unknown, but evidence suggests that allergic sensitization to food and airborne allergens may play a key role. This retrospective study examines the rate of sensitization to both food and airborne allergens in EoE patients, and compares their sensitivity patterns to control groups. Methods: We identified 103 patients with a diagnosis of EoE via esophageal eosinophilia (≥15 eosinophils/high‐power field [hpf]), who had undergone comprehensive food and/or airborne allergen testing through either skin or in vitro methods. Food and airborne allergen sensitization was defined as positive testing in at least 1 food subgroup (milk, peanut, tree nut, seafood/fish, soy, grain, egg) or airborne subgroup (tree, grass, weed, mite/cockroach, animal, mold), respectively. The same sensitization criterion was applied to allergic rhinitis (AR) patients, with and without a clinical suspicion of food allergy (FA), in order to create control groups. Results: Sensitization in the EoE group to at least 1 subgroup of food allergen and airborne allergen was seen in 77.1% (64/83) and 71.7% (38/53), respectively (p = 0.82). There were significant differences in sensitization between EoE and control groups for tree nut, soy, grain, and egg, but no differences noted in any of the other food or airborne allergen subgroups, even after accounting for age and gender. Conclusion: EoE and control groups had similar airborne allergen sensitization patterns, yet dissimilar food allergen sensitization patterns, suggesting that specific allergens may play a more prominent role in the pathogenesis of EoE. The EoE group had a more uniform distribution pattern for food allergens, compared to controls. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]