Search

This paper analyses the determinants of regional economic growth in the European Union adopting a non-parametric approach. Although the local-linear kernel estimator applied does not explicitly take into account the spatial dimension of the data, it is found to be consistent in our context. In addition, the geographically weighted regression turns out to be less efficient. We obtain evidence of a non-linear relationship between regional growth and its determinants in the form of parameter heterogeneity and threshold effects. These non-linearities mainly affect the initial productivity of labour, the human capital endowment and, as a novelty, the level of infrastructures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper seeks to make a contribution to the study of personhood in EU free movement law by linking a historical and doctrinal analysis with the internal transformation of the homo economicus in economic liberalism. It is argued that a shift can be observed in the government of mobility from 'freeing up' the ability of the worker as a relatively passive subject tied to external economic mechanisms to the targeting of the individual him/herself as a responsible, active bearer of economic capability or 'human capital', whereby past socio-economic conduct and prospective economic activity serve as the thresholds for the entitlement to rights. The essence of the 'new' homo economicus of EU free movement law is situated at the intersection of the social and economic, serving as a rational frame for the government of the European mover on the basis of a mutual responsibility between the Union citizen and his/her host Member State towards social and economic activity, self-sufficiency and integration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper explores the relationship between FDI and economic growth in eight transition countries - EU candidates - in the period 1994-2001. Surprisingly, statistically robust negative causal relationship between FDI and growth emerged implying that FDI hampered their real convergence with EU. This result can be explained by the form of FDI. In the observed period, acquisitions were the predominant form and the proceeds of the sales were spent on consumption and imports rather than enhancing productive assets. Indeed, current account and FDI were strongly linked; the bigger the inflow of FDI into a country, the higher its current account deficit and foreign debt. Small size of the host countries and concentration of FDI in trade and finance could weaken productivity spillovers while increased efficiency of the acquired firm could be more than offset by the reduction of economic links with local firms. FDI would also not automatically increase competition as it could force small emerging local competitors out of business. While foreign trade increased through FDI, multinationals contributed more to imports than to exports. Finally, while FDI might support human capital formation, this type of spillovers simply does not seem to be very relevant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]