Search

The authors study the endogenous determination of financial and trade openness. They construct a theoretical framework leading to two-way feedbacks between financial and trade openness and identify these feedbacks empirically. They find that one standard deviation increase in commercial openness is associated with a 9.5% increase in de facto financial openness (% of GDP). Similarly, an increase in de facto financial openness has powerful effects on future trade openness. De jure restrictions on capital mobility have only a weak impact on de facto financial openness, while de jure restrictions on the current account have a large adverse effect on commercial openness. The authors investigate the relative magnitudes of these directions of causality using Geweke's (1982 ) decomposition methodology. They conclude that in an era of rapidly growing trade integration, countries cannot choose financial openness independently of their degree of openness to trade. Dealing with greater exposure to turbulence by imposing restrictions on financial flows is likely to be ineffectual. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the concept of economics and economic growth. She cites the explanation of John Kenneth Galbraith, who says that economics remains an ideological defense of the capitalist system, or a resort and occupation of some of the most determined minds. She also mentions other propositions in economics, which all relates economics to the use of words, arithmetic, geometry, and algebra. In order to effectively analyze the global economic system, she further elaborates that the system of national income accounting is best to be considered. Growth, on the hand, is said to be the result of measuring the gross national product or gross domestic product of a country.