Search

Abstract: Infants with a high‐risk distribution of port‐wine stains are commonly screened for Sturge‐Weber syndrome using brain magnetic resonance imaging. There is no consensus about which port‐wine stain phenotypes to screen, optimal timing, screening sensitivity, or whether presymptomatic diagnosis improves neurodevelopmental outcomes. This state‐of‐the‐art review examines the evidence in favor of screening for Sturge‐Weber syndrome, based on its effect on neurodevelopmental outcomes, against the risks and limitations of screening magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography. A literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE was conducted between January 2005 and May 2017 using key search terms. Relevant articles published in English were reviewed; 34 articles meeting the search criteria were analyzed according to the following outcome measures: neurodevelopmental outcome benefit of screening, diagnostic yield, financial costs, procedural risks, and limitations of screening magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography. There is no evidence that a presymptomatic Sturge‐Weber syndrome diagnosis with magnetic resonance imaging results in better neurodevelopmental outcomes. The utility of electroencephalographic screening is also unestablished. In Sturge‐Weber syndrome, neurodevelopmental outcomes depend on prompt recognition of neurologic red flags and early seizure control. Small numbers and a lack of prospective randomized controlled trials limit these findings. For infants with port‐wine stain involving skin derived from the frontonasal placode (forehead and hemifacial phenotypes), we recommend early referral to a pediatric neurologist for parental education, counselling, and monitoring for neurologic red flags and seizures and consideration of electroencephalography regardless of whether magnetic resonance imaging is performed or its findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: We aimed to determine whether response to ketogenic dietary therapies (KDT) was due to undiagnosed glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome (GLUT1-DS).Method: Targeted resequencing of the SLC2A1 gene was completed in individuals without previously known GLUT1-DS who received KDT for their epilepsy. Hospital records were used to obtain demographic and clinical data. Response to KDT at various follow-up points was defined as seizure reduction of at least 50%. Seizure freedom achieved at any follow-up point was also documented. Fisher's exact and gene-burden association tests were conducted using the PLINK/SEQ open-source genetics library.Results: Of the 246 participants, one was shown to have a novel variant in SLC2A1 that was predicted to be deleterious. This individual was seizure-free on KDT. Rates of seizure freedom in cases without GLUT1-DS were below 8% at each follow-up point. Two cases without SLC2A1 mutations were seizure-free at every follow-up point recorded. No significant results were obtained from Fisher's exact or gene-burden association tests.Interpretation: A favourable response to KDT is not solely explained by mutations in SLC2A1. Other genetic factors should be sought to identify those who are most likely to benefit from dietary treatment for epilepsy, particularly those who may achieve seizure freedom. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]