Search

Background: Patient‐centered care is the best practice in the care of pregnant and postpartum patients. The COVID‐19 pandemic prompted changes in perinatal care policies, which were often reactive, resulting in unintended consequences, many of which made the delivery of patient‐centered care more difficult. This study aimed to understand the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on perinatal health care delivery from the perspective of family physicians in the United States. Methods: From October 5 to November 4, 2020, we surveyed mid‐ to late‐career family physicians who provide perinatal care. We conducted descriptive analyses to measure the impact of COVID‐19 on prenatal care, labor and delivery, postpartum care, patient experience, and patient volume. An immersion‐crystallization approach was used to analyze qualitative data provided as open‐text comments. Results: Of the 1518 survey respondents, 1062 (69.8%) stated that they currently attend births; 595 of those elaborated about the impact of COVID‐19 on perinatal care in free‐text comments. Eight themes emerged related to the impact of COVID‐19 on perinatal care: visitation, patient decisions, testing, personal protective equipment, care continuity, changes in care delivery, reassignment, and volume. The greatest perceived impact of COVID‐19 was on patient experience. Conclusions: Family physicians who provided perinatal care during the COVID‐19 pandemic noted a considerable impact on patient experience, which particularly affected the ability to deliver patient‐centered and family‐centered care. Continued research is needed to understand the long‐term impact of policies affecting the delivery of patient‐centered perinatal care and to inform more evidence‐based, proactive policies to be implemented in future pandemic or disaster situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To measure satisfaction with general practitioner obstetrician‐led maternity care in Western Australia and to explore perspectives of maternity service users Design: Women were recruited at antenatal visits with their general practitioner obstetrician. Participants completed a validated three‐part survey about their satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care. They were all offered a semi‐structured interview. Setting: Nine general practitioner obstetrician practices located in regional Western Australia. Participants: 155 women receiving general practitioner obstetrician‐led maternity care within the South West or Great Southern regions of Western Australia. 13 of these women also participated in an interview. Main Outcome Measures: We quantified satisfaction with aspects of antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care using a Likert scale. Descriptive variables included demographic information and birth outcomes. Qualitative data described valued aspects of maternity care. Results: 116 women completed all 3 surveys. General practitioner obstetrician‐led care resulted in high rates of satisfaction across all 3 stages of care, with 78%‐100% agreement with positively worded satisfaction statements. Thematic analysis identified four key aspects of care women valued when receiving maternity care: the woman‐centred care experience, the skills of the general practitioner obstetrician, support from the health care team and the health care environment. Conclusion: General practitioner obstetrician‐led maternity care is a highly regarded model of maternity care, valued by rural women with high rates of satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Informed consent in obstetrics should involve full disclosure of risks, benefits and alternative interventions. However, we have found no evidence of a formal informed consent process before an attempt at vaginal delivery in published policy or practice. The idea of informed consent in vaginal birth has attracted controversy and has been the subject of some debate. Aim: To explore the perspectives and experiences of informed consent and birth preparedness/complication readiness for birthing women in a high resource setting. Materials and methods: Qualitative study using semi‐structured interviews to examine experiences and perspectives of women following birth. Results: Forty telephone interviews were concluded. Eight statement categories were identified: (i) no issues of consent, (ii) absent/inadequate informed consent, (iii) adequate birth preparedness/complication readiness, (iv) inadequate birth preparedness/complication readiness, (v) desire to forfeit decision making to a trusted and accountable health professional, (vi) belief that informed consent is not realistic in birth under some circumstances, (vii) negative feelings related to birth and (viii) poor postnatal follow‐up. Conclusions: When complications arose during birth, 20% of participants felt that informed consent was absent/inadequate, 25% of participants suggested policy change in favour of a formal informed consent process and 55% of participants suggested policy change in favour of increased birth preparedness/complication readiness. Our study suggests that informed consent for vaginal birth and formal birth preparedness/complication readiness should form part of routine antenatal care. Women's preferences for decision‐making and informed consent should be established before birth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]