Search

Objective: This study examined how clients' selection and preference for noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy changed with genetic counseling (GC) performed by certified geneticists at a primary hospital specializing in obstetrics, where other multiple prenatal genetic tests options were available. Methods: A total of 334 couples who underwent GC between 2017 and 2019 were included in the study. The average age of the pregnant women who underwent GC was 35.1 years. Results: Among the 95 couples (28.4%) who wanted NIPT at the start of GC, 10 (10.5%) switched to other tests, and 4 (4.2%) chose not to undergo any test. Among the 106 (31.7%) couples who wanted the combination of ultrasonography and the serum marker test, 12 (11.3%) chose not to undergo the test. Among the 92 (27.5%) couples who were undecided before GC, 21 (22.8%) wanted NIPT, 31 (33.7%) selected combined tests, and 18 (19.6%) did not undergo any test. Conclusion: We have demonstrated the significance of GC before prenatal genetic testing under widespread use of NIPT. Ideally, obstetric facilities should provide GC, or at least, pre‐counseling at their own facilities, and offer multiple prenatal genetic testing options or refer to other facilities for the same. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the rates of termination of pregnancy (TOP) for fetal chromosomal abnormalities and factors related to such parental decision in Japan.Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study of chromosomal abnormalities diagnosed before 22 weeks of gestation between April 2008 and March 2015. The pregnancy outcomes and parental decisions were investigated.Results: Among 931 fetuses with chromosome abnormalities, the total TOP rate was 75.1% (699/931). TOP rates were 89.3% (585/655) in autosomal aneuploidies and 40.8% (51/125) in sex chromosome aneuploidies. Trisomy 21 showed the highest TOP rate (93.8% [390/416]) followed by trisomy 18 (84.5% [163/193]) and trisomy 13 (71.9% [23/32]). Indications for karyotyping were related to a parental decision for TOP (p < 0.01): in cases of autosomal aneuploidy, with fetal abnormal ultrasound findings as the reference value, diagnoses made following positive results at non-invasive prenatal testing (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 13.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.07-45.9) and those because of advanced maternal age (adj. OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.15-7.35) were significantly more frequent.Conclusions: In Japan, pregnancies with fetal trisomy 21 are more likely to result in TOP when diagnosed in utero than any other chromosome anomaly. The indications for prenatal karyotyping strongly affect the decision to TOP. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: To identify adequate weight gain ranges during pregnancy in Japanese women. Method: Obstetric records from 2001 to 2002 for 46,659 term, singleton, vaginally delivered live births was used to estimate IUGR and macrosomia risk. Total maternal weight gain was grouped according to gestational age-specific percentile values of weight gain as follows: “very low” (under the 25th), “low” (25th to 49th), “moderate” (50th to 74th), “high” (75th to 89th), and “very high” (90th and over). Results: About 6% of infants were identified as having IUGR and 0.9% as macrosomia. IUGR risk was elevated with low weight gains. Macrosomia risk was related to high weight gains and previous spontaneous abortions. Conclusion: Achieving weight gains between the 50th and 75th percentiles for gestational age was considered adequate for optimal fetal growth in Japanese pregnant women. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]