Search

Antarctic sea ice concentration (SIC) prediction at seasonal scale has been documented, but a gap remains at subseasonal scale (1–8 weeks) due to limited understanding of ice‐related physical mechanisms. To overcome this limitation, we developed a deep learning model named Sea Ice Prediction Network (SIPNet) that can predict SIC without the need to account for complex physical processes. Compared to mainstream dynamical models like European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, and Seamless System for Prediction and Earth System Research developed at Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, as well as a relatively advanced statistical model like the linear Markov model, SIPNet outperforms them all, effectively filling the gap in subseasonal Antarctic SIC prediction capability. SIPNet results indicate that autumn SIC variability contributes the most to sea ice predictability, whereas spring contributes the least. In addition, the Weddell Sea displays the highest sea ice predictability, while predictability is low in the West Pacific. SIPNet can also capture the signal of ENSO and SAM on sea ice. Plain Language Summary: Antarctic sea ice has changed significantly since 2016, leading to a higher demand for sea ice forecasts. However, forecasting Antarctic sea ice has not received enough attention. Limited observations and lack of understanding of ice‐related physical mechanisms result in significant errors in sea ice predictions in dynamical models, particularly at the subseasonal timescale. We utilized a deep‐learning model to predict Antarctic sea ice at this timescale to fill this gap. Results showed that the deep‐learning model performed skillfully 1–8 weeks in advance, with the Weddell Sea being the best‐predicted region and the West Pacific being the worst. Furthermore, our study found that the model significantly outperformed mainstream dynamic models and a conventional statistical model. These findings build a foundation for developing more advanced prediction models at high resolutions for operational applications. Key Points: A deep‐learning model outperforms dynamic models, filling a subseasonal Antarctic sea ice prediction gap by bypassing physical mechanismsUnlike a Markov model that predicts time series of fixed spatial patterns, our model can extract ice synchronized spatiotemporal evolutionsThe deep‐learning model captures climate signals in sea ice, delivering the best prediction in fall season and the Weddell Sea region [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unlike the rapid decline of Arctic sea ice in the warming climate, Antarctic sea‐ice extent exhibits a modest positive trend in the period of near four decades. In recent years, the fluctuation in Antarctic sea ice has been strengthened, including a decrease toward the lowest sea‐ice extent in February 2011 for the period of 1978–2016 and a strong rebound in the summer of 2012. The sea‐ice recovery mainly occurs in the Weddell Sea, Bellingshausen Sea, Amundsen Sea, southern Ross Sea, and the eastern Somov Sea. This study offers a new mechanism for this summertime sea‐ice rebound. We demonstrate that cloud‐fraction anomalies in winter 2011 contributed to the positive Antarctic sea‐ice anomaly in summer 2012. The results show that the negative cloud‐fraction anomalies in winter 2011 related to the large‐scale atmospheric circulation resulted in a substantial negative surface‐radiation budget, which cooled the surface and promoted more sea‐ice growth. The sea‐ice growth anomalies due to the negative cloud forcing propagated by sea‐ice motion vectors from September 2011 to January 2012. The distribution of the sea‐ice anomalies corresponded well with the sea‐ice concentration anomalies in February 2012 in the Weddell Sea and eastern Somov Sea. Thus, negative cloud‐fraction anomalies in winter can play a vital role in the following summer sea‐ice distribution. Key Points: Wintertime cloud fraction anomalies in 2011 contributed significantly to the summertime sea‐ice rebound in 2012 in the AntarcticLess cloud fraction in winter 2011 related to large‐scale atmospheric circulation resulted in a strong negative surface‐radiation budgetCloud forcing in winter 2011 cooled the surface, promoted more sea‐ice growth, and resulted in more sea‐ice survival in summer 2012 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]