Search

The article determines whether patients with cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors undergoing surgical repair of hip fracture benefit from a higher or lower transfusion trigger. Laboratory and clinical data suggest that patients with cardiovascular disease are vulnerable to anemia. Moreover, observational studies suggest that cardiovascular disease patients benefit from higher transfusion.

The morbidity, mortality and economic burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and associated anaemia are substantial. With the increasing numbers of patients who are likely to be affected in the future, approaches are required to improve anaemia management without increasing the burden on health-care professionals. A multidisciplinary approach to treatment, where early initiation of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) is encouraged, may improve patient outcomes. Recent studies also suggest that the early use of iron therapy in patients with CKD not on dialysis may be associated with beneficial effects on haemoglobin levels. Another strategy to reduce the burden on health-care providers is to simplify anaemia management by extending the administration interval of ESA. Indeed, recent studies have explored the efficacy of extending the administration interval of ESA in clinical practice in CKD patients on dialysis and not on dialysis. The ability to maintain haemoglobin levels within guideline ranges at extended administration intervals may improve patient care and reduce the workload of health-care providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Exogenous recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is a beneficial therapeutic agent for correction of anemia in both chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Transfusion requirements in ESRD patients are reduced significantly and anemia management is much improved. Despite widespread use and near-universal exposure of ESRD patients to the drug, rHuEPO remains an effective and safe product. However, a number of nonhematologic complications are described with rHuEPO therapy. Most notable is hypertension, whereas the connection between seizure and enhanced thrombosis is less clear. A possible complication recently described is exacerbation of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Finally, other less common adverse effects, although rare in most patients, should be recognized as such by physicians who prescribe rHuEPO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anaemia is a common condition among pre-end-stage renal disease (pre-ESRD) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Indeed, data from clinical studies indicate that anaemia may be present in as many as two-thirds of such patients. Use of recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) provides an effective means of correcting anaemia in CKD patients and helps to reduce the risk of renal disease progression and related problems. Unfortunately, EPO therapy is underutilized in these persons. Consequently, anaemia remains a major problem in the pre-ESRD CKD population. Evidence suggests that anaemia in the presence of CKD can lead to an increased risk of a number of adverse outcomes, including mortality, progression of kidney disease, coronary heart disease, stroke, hospitalization, and decreases in quality of life. Anaemia's association with these adverse outcomes suggests that effective treatment of anaemia in pre-ESRD CKD patients is of great importance and that substantial efforts should be made to ensure that these patients receive appropriate therapy to correct anaemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO, epoetin) revolutionized the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) when it was approved for use in the United States in 1989. Among dialysis patients, the mean hemoglobin (Hb) in patients undergoing dialysis rose from 7–8 g/dl prior to 1989 to 11–12 g/dl today. Among patients with CKD not on dialysis, epoetin use has not been as broadly applied as among dialysis patients, and although the mean Hb level in this patient population has increased, the impact has been less than in patients on dialysis. The optimal treatment target for epoetin remains controversial. Consistent with clinical practice guidelines, current practice in dialysis patients in the United States aims to maintain a target Hb of 11–12 g/dl, a level that is still well below the normal range. Debate centers on whether the current Hb target is too low and whether the target range is too narrow. Quality of life clearly improves in many individuals as Hb rises into the normal range from lower levels. In retrospective studies, higher Hb levels have been associated with lower risks of hospitalization and mortality. However, one large, prospective clinical trial has raised concern about normalizing Hb in hemodialysis patients with cardiac disease, and other prospective studies have not yet provided convincing evidence of significant benefits from normalizing Hb in dialysis-dependent and non-dialysis-dependent patients with CKD. A relative lack of information on non-dialysis-dependent patients with CKD and changes in fiscal policies regulating reimbursement for epoetin have contributed to uncertainty as to the best practices for anemia management in patients with CKD. There is increasing interest in the potential benefits of broadening the current target Hb range or eliminating an upper limit altogether and instead establishing a minimum Hb goal. While some extension of the upper limit of the currently recommended target Hb range might appear to be reasonable, the extent to which this should be extended, the benefits, risks, and costs of maintaining higher Hb levels in patients with CKD, and whether target Hb levels should be different in different CKD patient groups remains to be determined. Future efforts are likely to focus on selecting patient populations most likely to benefit from normalizing Hb, while adjusting the range of a subnormal Hb target for others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Numerous prior studies have reported that a substantially higher dose of epoetin is required to maintain haemoglobin (Hb) concentration when patients are switched from a subcutaneous (SC) to intravenous (IV) route of administration. Many of the reported trials, however, involved patients who did not have adequate serum iron levels. It was hypothesized that patients with adequate iron stores who are switched from one route of administration to the other without a change in dose will experience substantially less change in their Hb concentration. Haemodialysis patients who were iron replete (ferritin 300–800 µg/L, transferrin saturation (TSAT) 25–50%) participated in a prospective, randomized cross-over trial receiving epoetin for 3 months either by SC or IV injection followed by a further 3 months of epoetin via the other route. The principal aim was to determine changes in Hb concentration without altering the weekly epoetin dose. The secondary aim was to assess whether the frequency of dosing (once, twice or thrice weekly) influenced the Hb concentration response. Eighty-one patients (mean age 62 years, 60% male) entered the study and 15 withdrew prior to study completion. Forty-three patients began SC epoetin alfa administration (group A) and 38 on IV (group B). Median ferritin and TSAT at entry for groups A and B were 409 and 394 µg/L (NS) and 31 and 32% (NS), respectively, which remained within the target range during the study. Median epoetin doses for groups A and B were similar (90 vs 93 IU/kg per week, NS). After 3 months, the mean Hb concentration rose for group A (SC; 118.7–121.9 g/L ( P = 0.03)) but it fell for group B (IV; 119.1–116.0 g/L ( P = 0.019)). Following the change in route of administration, the Hb concentration for group A (IV) fell by 5.1% over 3 months (121.9–115.4, P < 0.001) and rose by 2.8% for group B (SC) over 3 months (116.0–119.7, P = 0.001). Similar significant changes in the Hb concentration were seen at different dosing frequencies. Subcutaneuos administration of epoetin produces a significant, although slight clinical change in Hb concentration compared with IV administration in stable, iron replete, haemodialysis patients. A similar effect appears to prevail regardless of the frequency of injections given. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the last decade the nephrology community has learned much about the impact of anemia on patients with kidney disease. Therapy of anemia can correct many of the symptoms which seriously compromise patient function. Despite the obvious benefits, controversy continues regarding the optimal target hemoglobin concentration both in patients prior to dialysis and in dialysis populations. In this editorial we review the clinical data that contribute to this controversy and the physiologic concepts underlying the treatment of anemia. Furthermore, we discuss the need to individualize hemoglobin targets for specific patient populations and the importance of early identification and treatment of anemia in patients with kidney disease. The economic impact of normalizing hemoglobin with the use of erythropoietin and intravenous or oral iron has affected clinical practice over the last decade. Current guidelines published by Kidney Disease Outcomes and Quality Initiative (KDOQI), the European Working Group on Anemia Management, and the Canadian Society of Nephrology all recommend target hemoglobin concentrations and thresholds for initiation of therapy and also suggest the need for reevaluation of current targets in light of new evidence. This editorial supports those guidelines and challenges the reader to critically evaluate current practice in the context of the accumulating data and the physiologic principles discussed herein. The therapy of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is becoming increasingly sophisticated and is an essential component of care in patients with CKD. However, the effects of therapy will be most impressive when accompanied by the optimal care of all hemodynamic and metabolic abnormalities that are associated with CKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]