Search

Objective: Serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and placental growth factor (PlGF) at 11-13 weeks' gestation are reduced in pregnancies with fetal trisomy and in those that subsequently develop pre-eclampsia (PE). In screening for trisomy, the established biochemical marker is PAPP-A, whereas in screening for PE, the preferred marker is PlGF. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of replacing PAPP-A by PlGF in first-trimester screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness (NT) and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG).Methods: This was a prospective screening study in singleton pregnancies for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by a combination of maternal age, fetal NT and serum PAPP-A and free β-hCG at 11-13 weeks' gestation in which we also measured PlGF. Multiples of the median (MoM) values were calculated for PAPP-A, free β-hCG and PlGF. The dataset was split randomly into training and test datasets of roughly equal size, and the parameters for PlGF obtained from the training dataset were used in risk calculation for the test dataset. Standardized detection rates were computed by obtaining the likelihood ratios for biochemistry and fetal NT for trisomy-21, -18 and -13 pregnancies in the sample and then applying these to each year of maternal age from 12 to 50 to estimate the age-specific detection rates. These were then weighted according to the maternal age distributions of trisomy-21, -18 and -13 pregnancies in England and Wales in 2018. Similarly, standardized false-positive rates (FPR) were computed by obtaining the likelihood ratios for biochemistry and NT, as appropriate, in normal pregnancies in the sample and then applying these to each year of maternal age from 12 to 50 to estimate the age-specific FPRs. A modeling approach was used to assess the performance of screening according to gestational age at biochemical testing.Results: The study population of 71 266 pregnancies included 70 858 (99.4%) with normal fetal karyotype or birth of a phenotypically normal neonate and 263 with trisomy 21, 109 with trisomy 18 and 36 with trisomy 13. There are five main findings of this study. First, the performance of screening for trisomy by the first-trimester combined test or the combined test in which PAPP-A is replaced by PlGF is substantially better at 11 than at 13 weeks' gestation; for example, the detection rates of trisomy 21 by the combined test were 94%, 90% and 84%, at 5% FPR, when testing was carried out at 11, 12 and 13 weeks, respectively, and the corresponding values in screening by a test in which PAPP-A is replaced by PlGF were 90%, 87% and 86%, respectively. Second, in trisomy-21 pregnancies, the deviation of median PAPP-A MoM from normal decreases with increasing gestational age, whereas the deviation in PlGF does not change with gestational age. Third, the performance of screening for trisomy 21 during the 11th and 12th gestational weeks is superior if screening includes PAPP-A rather than PlGF, whereas during the 13th week the performance is slightly higher with the use of PlGF rather than PAPP-A. Fourth, in our population with mean gestational age at testing of 12.7 weeks, screening by maternal age, fetal NT, serum free β-hCG and serum PAPP-A predicted 88%, 96% and 97% of cases of fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13, respectively, at a FPR of 5%; the respective values in screening by a test in which PAPP-A is replaced by PlGF were 85%, 96% and 96%. Fifth, addition of serum PlGF does not improve the prediction of trisomy provided by maternal age, fetal NT and serum free β-hCG and PAPP-A.Conclusion: In first-trimester screening for trisomy, the preferred biochemical marker is PAPP-A rather than PlGF, especially when biochemical testing is carried out during the 11th week of gestation or earlier. However, if PlGF was to be used rather than PAPP-A, the same detection rate can be achieved but at a higher FPR. This may be an acceptable compromise to minimize cost and achieve effective screening for both trisomy and PE. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine the effect of chronic hypertension (CH), with and without superimposed pre-eclampsia (PE), on the incidence of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate and to explore the possible mechanism for such association.Methods: Data for this study were derived from prospective screening for adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with singleton pregnancy attending their first routine hospital visit at 11-13 weeks' gestation, which included recording of maternal characteristics and medical history and measurement of mean arterial pressure (MAP). Birth-weight Z-score, adjusted for gestational age and maternal and pregnancy characteristics, and incidence of SGA were compared between those with and those without CH in the total population and in the subgroups of pregnancies with and without PE. Regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between MAP and birth-weight Z-score and incidence of SGA and PE in those with and those without CH.Results: The study population constituted 74 226 pregnancies, including 1052 (1.4%) with CH and 73 174 without CH. PE developed in 233 (22.1%) cases of the group with CH and in 1662 (2.3%) of those without CH. In the group that developed PE, there was no significant difference for either median birth-weight Z-score or incidence of SGA between those with CH and those without CH. In the group without PE, the incidence of SGA was twice as high in those with CH than in those without. There was a significant association between log10 MAP multiples of the median and incidence of SGA and PE, which was more marked in those with CH than in those without.Conclusion: CH is associated with an increased risk of SGA and PE and this is related to MAP at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To identify whether preterm surveillance clinics (PSCs) risk-stratify high-risk women accurately by comparing outcomes of those admitted to hospital on the basis of asymptomatic testing with those not admitted.Methods: We performed a subanalysis from a larger prospective cohort study on sonographic cervical length, quantitative fetal fibronectin (qfFN) and risk of spontaneous preterm birth. We identified 1130 asymptomatic singleton pregnancies at high risk of preterm birth, screened between 23 and 28 weeks of gestation at a PSC in a tertiary hospital in London, UK. Gestational age at delivery, the proportion of preterm births that delivered < 30 weeks and neonatal outcomes were compared between women admitted electively when asymptomatic as a consequence of screening-test results and those who were not routinely admitted.Results: In total, 66 (6%) women attending the PSC were admitted to hospital following asymptomatic screening (inpatient group). The mean gestational age at delivery for those not admitted electively (outpatient group) was at term and was significantly higher than that of those admitted from PSC (38.4 vs 31.2 weeks; P < 0.0001). Preterm birth < 30 weeks' gestation was rare in the outpatient group relative to those admitted (1.32% vs 36.4%; P < 0.0001). Neonatal mortality was 0.188% in the outpatient group compared with 4.55% in those admitted electively (P < 0.0001). The incidence of other complications such as neonatal death, 5-min Apgar score < 7, special care baby unit/neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage and low birth weight were significantly lower in those managed as outpatients than in those admitted electively.Conclusion: PSCs measuring cervical length and qfFN accurately triage asymptomatic high-risk pregnant women, enabling those at highest risk of adverse outcome to be identified for elective admission to hospital and appropriate management. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]