1. Hierarchical management of chronic heart failure: a perspective based on the latent structure of comorbidities
- Author
-
Chu Zheng, Linai Han, Qinghua Han, Ke Wang, Hong Yang, Jing Li, Jingjing Yan, Hangzhi He, Yanbo Zhang, Jing Tian, Bingxia Meng, and Gangfei Han
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Comorbidity ,Ventricular Function, Left ,Internal medicine ,Atrial Fibrillation ,medicine ,Humans ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,Mortality ,Aged ,Heart Failure ,Fibrillation ,Ejection fraction ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,LCA ,Hazard ratio ,Stroke Volume ,Original Articles ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Latent class model ,Chronic heart failure ,Heart failure ,RC666-701 ,Original Article ,medicine.symptom ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Readmission - Abstract
Aims Chronic heart failure (CHF) has an increasing burden of comorbidities, which affect clinical outcomes. Few studies have focused on the clustering and hierarchical management of patients with CHF based on comorbidity. This study aimed to explore the cluster model of CHF patients based on comorbidities and to verify their relationship with clinical outcomes. Methods and results Electronic health records of patients hospitalized with CHF from January 2014 to April 2019 were collected, and 12 common comorbidities were included in the latent class analysis. The Fruchterman–Reingold layout was used to draw the comorbidity network, and analysis of variance was used to compare the weighted degrees among them. The incidence of clinical outcomes among different clusters was presented on Kaplan–Meier curves and compared using the log‐rank test, and the hazard ratio was calculated using the Cox proportional risk model. Sensitivity analysis was performed according to the left ventricular ejection fraction. Four different clinical clusters from 4063 total patients were identified: metabolic, ischaemic, high comorbidity burden, and elderly‐atrial fibrillation. Compared with the metabolic cluster, patients in the high comorbidity burden cluster had the highest adjusted risk of combined outcome and all‐cause mortality {1.67 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.40–1.99] and 2.87 [95% CI, 2.17–3.81], respectively}, followed by the elderly‐atrial fibrillation and ischaemic clusters. The adjusted readmission risk of patients with ischaemic, high comorbidity burden, and elderly‐atrial fibrillation clusters were 1.35 (95% CI, 1.08–1.68), 1.39 (95% CI, 1.13–1.72), and 1.42 (95% CI, 1.14–1.77), respectively. The comorbidity network analysis found that patients in the high comorbidity burden cluster had more and higher comorbidity correlations than those in other clusters. Sensitivity analysis revealed that patients in the high comorbidity burden cluster had the highest risk of combined outcome and all‐cause mortality (P
- Published
- 2022