Search

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The spinal cord central echo complex (SCCEC) is a special ultrasonography-based intramedullary structure, but its clinical significance in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is undefined. This study aimed to explore the potential of the SCCEC in predicting postoperative neurological recovery in DCM. METHODS Thirty-two DCM patients who underwent intraoperative ultrasonography-guided French-door laminoplasty were prospectively enrolled. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score was evaluated preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. SCCEC width (SCCEC-W), and anteroposterior diameter (APD) and transverse diameter (TD) of the spinal cord were measured on transverse ultrasonographic images, while the tissue widths from anterior and posterior borders of the spinal cord to the SCCEC were measured on sagittal ultrasonographic images. The APD of the spinal cord and occupying rate of the spinal canal were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS All patients achieved improvements in mJOA scores, with an average recovery rate (RR) of 68.69 ± 20.22%. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that SCCEC-W, and ratios between the SCCEC-W and APD/TD based on ultrasonography, correlated moderately with mJOA score RR, with coefficients of -0.527, -0.605 and -0.514, respectively. The ratio between SCCEC-W and ultrasonographic TD correlated moderately with preoperative APD of the spinal cord. The MRI measurements and ultrasonography-based tissue widths showed no significant correlation with mJOA score RR. CONCLUSIONS The SCCEC may have predictive potential as an intraoperative indicator of neurological recovery in treating DCM. SCCEC-W may be related to spinal cord compression in DCM.

Background To evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and utility of sonography (US) and CT fusion imaging guidance for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of malignant liver tumors not visualized on conventional US. Methods Seventy-seven patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and 15 patients with metastatic liver cancer with a total of 136 lesions underwent RFA with US and CT fusion imaging guidance. The mean number of punctures, success rate of a single ablation session, local tumor progression rates, and long-term outcome were evaluated. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by dynamic CT and contrast-enhanced US 1 month after RFA. Results RFA was technically feasible in all patients, and no major complications occurred. The mean ± SD time needed to synchronize US and CT images was 13.9 ± 11.9 minutes (range, 5–55 minutes). The success rate of a single ablation session was 83.8% (114/136), and tumor residue was present in 7.4% of lesions (10/136). The mean number of treatment sessions was 1.2 ± 0.5 sessions. During follow-up, local tumor progression was observed for 15 (11.9%) lesions. Distant tumor recurrence was found in 51 (55.4%) patients. Conclusions US and CT fusion-assisted RFA is a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic liver cancer. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 42:321–330, 2014

Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) measuring ≤2 cm in diameter. Methods We identified 104 focal liver lesions measuring ≤2 cm in 104 consecutive patients who were enrolled for baseline sonography (BUS) and CEUS examination (49 HCCs, 55 non-HCCs). A real-time, contrast-specific mode of contrast pulse sequencing and a sulphur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent were used for CEUS. The diagnostic performances of BUS and CEUS in differentiating focal liver lesions (HCC or non-HCC) were analyzed and compared. Results On CEUS, 43 (87.8%) of the 49 HCC lesions were hyperenhanced, 5 (10.2%) were isoenhanced, and 1 (2%) was hypoenhanced during the arterial phase when compared with adjacent liver tissue. Thirty-nine (79.6%) HCCs exhibited washout from the portal phase to the late phase. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy before and after contrast agent administration were 28.6% (14/49) versus 79.6% (39/49) (p 0.05), 82.4% (14/17) versus 90.7% (39/43) (p > 0.05), 59.8% (52/87) versus 90.7% (39/43) (p < 0.01), and 63.5% (66/104) versus 86.5% (90/104) (p < 0.001), respectively. No significant difference in diagnostic performance of CEUS was found between lesions measuring ≤1.5 cm and those 1.6–2 cm and between lesions located at a depth of ≤6 cm from the skin and those located deeper. Conclusions CEUS significantly improved the diagnostic performance in characterization of small HCCs ≤2 cm compared with BUS. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound, 2008

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of real-time contrast-enhanced sonography in characterization of small focal liver lesions (FLLs; < or = 3.0 cm in diameter). METHODS Two hundred small FLLs in 200 patients were examined by contrast-enhanced sonography using a contrast-specific mode of contrast pulse sequencing and a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent. The sonographic images were reviewed by 2 independent readers. A 5-point confidence level was used to discriminate malignant from benign FLLs, and specific diagnoses were recorded. The diagnostic performances were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the interobserver agreement was analyzed by weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS After review of contrast-enhanced sonography, ROC analysis revealed significant improvement in differentiating between malignant and benign small FLLs that the areas under the ROC curve were 0.856 at baseline sonography versus 0.954 at contrast-enhanced sonography for reader 1 (P < .001) and 0.857 versus 0.954 for reader 2 (P = .003). The sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for both readers also improved significantly after contrast agent administration (all P < .001). A better result of specific diagnosis was obtained (38.5% [77/200] at baseline sonography versus 80.5% [161/200] at contrast-enhanced sonography for reader 1 and 34.5% [69/200] versus 80.5% [161/200] for reader 2; both P < .001) after contrast agent administration, and a better interobserver agreement was achieved (kappa = 0.425 at baseline sonography versus 0.716 at contrast-enhanced sonography). CONCLUSIONS Real-time contrast-enhanced sonography improves the diagnostic performance in small FLLs compared with baseline sonography.