Search

Abstract Background Usage of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has prolonged the overall survival (OS) of patients with extensive‐stage small‐cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC). In clinical trials, males accounted for a large proportion, leading to the uncertainty of its efficacy in female patients. We therefore conducted this study to explore the efficacy and safety of using ICIs in female patients with ES‐SCLC. Methods We retrospectively enrolled female SCLC patients and subdivided them into two groups. Group A (n = 40) was defined as ES‐SCLC patients who received first‐line standard chemotherapy with or without ICIs. Group B (n = 47) included relapsed SCLC patients who were administered with second‐line therapies. Kaplan–Meier methodology was used to calculate survival analysis. Chi‐squared tests were used to analyze the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results Median progression‐free survival (PFS) and median OS favored the ICI‐contained cohorts (Group A PFS: 8.3 vs. 6.1 months; OS: not reached vs. 11.3 months; Group B PFS: 15.1 vs. 3.3 months; OS: 35.3 vs. 8.3 months), especially in those patients who received second‐line immunotherapies. Patients who received immunotherapy had a slightly higher incidence rate of grade ≥3 AEs (Group A: 71.4% vs. 46.2%; Group B: 44.5% vs. 13.2%). Those who developed grade ≥3 AEs in first‐line ICIs cohort had a more favorable survival (PFS: 8.3 vs. 3.2 months; OS: not reached vs. 5.1 months). Conclusions Our study suggested that female ES‐SCLC patients treated with immunotherapy tended to achieve a relatively longer survival. The incidence of AEs (grade ≥3) was higher in women patients receiving ICIs, which requires monitoring more closely.

Abstract Objective Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is an important driver gene of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite a rapid progress achieved in the targeted therapy, chemotherapy remains the standard treatment option for patients with KRAS‐mutant NSCLC. This study aimed to assess real‐world data of Chinese patients with KRAS‐mutant NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Methods KRAS mutational status was analyzed using next‐generation sequencing of 150,327 NSCLC patients from the Lung Cancer Big Data Precise Treatment Collaboration Group (LANDSCAPE) project (Cohort I). Treatment data were collected and analyzed retrospectively from 4348 NSCLC patients who were admitted to the Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute between January 2009 and October 2020 (Cohort II). Results In Cohort I, 18,224 patients were detected with KRAS mutations (12.1%) of whom G12C (29.6%) was the most frequent subtype, followed by G12D (18.1%) and G12V (17.5%). In case of concomitant mutations, TP53 had the highest incidence of 33.6%, followed by EGFR (11.6%), STK11 (10.4%), KEAP1(6.2%), and CDKN2A (6.0%). Cohort II included 497 patients (11.4%) with KRAS mutations. In the first‐line chemotherapeutic analysis of Cohort II, patients benefited more from the pemetrexed/platinum (PP) regimen than the gemcitabine/platinum (GP) or taxanes/platinum (TP) regimen (median progression‐free survival [PFS], 6.4 vs. 4.9 vs. 5.6 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48–0.88, p = 0.033 and HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.47–1.00, p = 0.05, respectively), with no significant difference when combined with bevacizumab. Regarding patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the objective response rate was 26% for a median PFS of 9.6 months (95% CI 6.16–13.03). Patients who received ICIs combined with chemotherapy had a significantly longer survival than monotherapy (median PFS, 13.9 vs. 5.2 months, HR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.35–0.99, p = 0.049). Conclusion KRAS is an important driver gene in NSCLC, compromising 12.1% in this study, and G12C was noted as the most common subtype. Patients with KRAS‐mutant NSCLC could benefit from pemetrexed‐based chemotherapy and ICIs.

Abstract Background For advanced nonsquamous non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the mechanisms of resistance to first‐line immunotherapy are not clear. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with agents targeting other pathways may serve as second‐line therapy options. Apatinib (a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor) could increase the efficacy of camrelizumab (an ICI agent). The efficacy and safety of this combination regimen as a second‐line therapy for NSCLC patients after failure on first‐line immunotherapy has not previously been evaluated. Methods In this single‐arm, multicenter, phase II trial, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC patients previously treated with single‐agent ICI or ICI plus chemotherapy will be enrolled. Participants will receive intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg D1 and oral apatinib 250 mg D1‐21 for a 21‐day cycle. The study treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint is progression‐free survival by investigator. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response by investigator, quality of life, safety, and toxicity. Conclusions This trial will provide evidence of the benefit of treatment with camrelizumab combined with apatinib in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC patients who were previously treated with first‐line immunotherapy.

Abstract Background Previous trials have suggested that elderly patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could benefit from nanoparticle albumin‐bound paclitaxel (nab‐paclitaxel). Real‐world data on the elderly Chinese population are lacking. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and tolerability of nab‐paclitaxel in Chinese elderly patients (≥65 years) with advanced NSCLC. Methods This study included 76 patients with a primary diagnosis of IIIB‐IV NSCLC from January 2010 to December 2017 at Peking University Cancer Hospital, who received nab‐paclitaxel (125 or 130 mg/m2 i.v.) every three weeks. The overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Results There were 12 patients who received nab‐paclitaxel as the first‐line treatment (seven also received carboplatin), and 64 received nab‐paclitaxel as the latter‐line treatment. The overall ORR, DCR, median PFS, and median OS were 14.5%, 69.7%, 5.2 months, and 12.2 months, respectively. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of one and the age of 70–74 years were independently associated with longer OS, while early treatment line of nab‐paclitaxel and age of 70–74 years were independently associated with longer PFS. The most common AEs were anemia, leukopenia, gastrointestinal reaction, fatigue, and peripheral neuropathy, which were all manageable. Dose adjustment or treatment discontinuation was encountered in 10 patients because of AEs. The incidence of AEs was not different among age subgroups. Conclusions Nab‐paclitaxel has a good clinical response profile in Chinese elderly patients with stage IIIB–IV NSCLC. Prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm these results. Key points Significant findings of the study Nanoparticle albumin‐bound paclitaxel (nab‐paclitaxel) has a good clinical response profile in Chinese elderly (≥65 years) patients with stage IIIB‐IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with acceptable and manageable adverse events. What this study adds Preliminary evidence shows a good clinical response from treatment with nab‐paclitaxel in Chinese elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Background Small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most aggressive types of lung cancer. The prognosis for SCLC patients depends on many factors. The intent of this study was to construct a nomogram model to predict mortality for extensive‐stage SCLC. Methods Original data was collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of the National Cancer Institute in the United States. A nomogram prognostic model was constructed to predict death probability for extensive‐stage SCLC. Results A total of 16 554 extensive‐stage SCLC patients from 2004 to 2014 in the SEER database were included in this study. Gender, race, age, TNM staging (including tumor extent, nodal status, and metastasis), and treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) were identified as independent predictors for lung cancer‐specific death for extensive‐stage SCLC patients. A nomogram model was constructed based on multivariate models for lung cancer related death and other cause related death. Performance of the two models was validated by calibration and discrimination, with C‐index values of 0.714 and 0.638, respectively. Conclusion A prognostic nomogram model was established to predict death probability for extensive‐stage SCLC. This validated prognostic model may be beneficial for treatment strategy choice and survival prediction.

Background Primary tumors located in the right and left side have distinctive prognoses, but the details have not been fully identified in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated the impact of primary tumor side on long‐term survival in NSCLC patients. Methods Data of 90 407 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program were analyzed. To avoid bias between groups, we used innovative propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Results There was no significant distinction in overall survival (OS) between right (n = 53 496) and left (n = 36 911) side tumors (hazard ratio [HR] 0.993, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9756–1.011; P = 0.432). Left side was associated with superior five‐year cancer‐specific survival (CSS) compared to right side NSCLC (HR 0.977, 95% CI 0.9574–0.9969; P = 0.024). No significant difference was observed in OS (P = 0.689) or CSS (P = 0.288) after PSM analysis. In the 51 319 patients who underwent surgery, left side (n = 21 245) was associated with poor OS compared to right side (n = 30 074) NSCLC (HR 1.039, 95% CI 1.011–1.067; P = 0.006), while CSS was similar (HR 1.031, 95% CI 0.997–1.065; P = 0.069). In patients who underwent surgery, there was also no significant difference in OS (P = 0.986) or CSS (P = 0.979) after PSM analysis. Conclusion The prognosis between right and left side NSCLC in stage I–IIIA was similar regardless of whether patients underwent surgery. Primary tumor side cannot be considered a prognostic factor when choosing appropriate treatment.