1. Peri-implant bone formations around (Ti,Zr)O2 -coated zirconia implants with different surface roughness
- Author
-
Young-Seok Park, Shin Hye Chung, Hong-Kyun Kim, and Won-Jun Shon
- Subjects
Male ,Materials science ,Surface Properties ,Histological response ,chemistry.chemical_element ,Peri implant bone ,Osseointegration ,Coated Materials, Biocompatible ,Implants, Experimental ,hemic and lymphatic diseases ,Surface roughness ,Animals ,Cubic zirconia ,Composite material ,Dental Implants ,Titanium ,Zirconium ,Tibia ,Dental Implantation, Endosseous ,Dental Prosthesis Design ,Torque ,chemistry ,Implant types ,Periodontics ,Rabbits - Abstract
Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the osseointegration in rabbit tibiae of smooth and roughened powder injection moulded (PIM) zirconia implants with or without (Ti,Zr)O2 surface coatings. Material and Methods Twenty-five rabbits received four types of external hex implants with identical geometry on the tibiae: PIM zirconia implants, roughened PIM zirconia implants, (Ti,Zr)O2-coated PIM zirconia implants and (Ti,Zr)O2-coated roughened PIM zirconia implants. The surface characteristics of the four types of implants were evaluated. Removal torque tests and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Results The (Ti,Zr)O2 coatings substantially changed the surface topography and chemical composition of the both type of PIM zirconia implants. There were statistically significant differences in the bone to implant contact ratios and removal torque values (RT) among the tested implant types (p
- Published
- 2013