Search

Background: Older patients with advanced cancer who are 100% certain they will be cured pose unique challenges for clinical decision making, but to the authors' knowledge, the prevalence and correlates of absolute certainty about curability (ACC) are unknown., Methods: Cross-sectional data were collected in a geriatric assessment trial. ACC was assessed by asking patients, "What do you believe are the chances that your cancer will go away and never come back with treatment?" Response options were 100% (coded as ACC), >50%, 50/50, <50%, 0%, and uncertain. The willingness to bear adversity in exchange for longevity was assessed by asking patients to consider trade-offs between survival and 2 clinical outcomes that varied in abstractness: 1) maintaining quality of life (QOL; an abstract outcome); and 2) specific treatment-related toxicities (eg, nausea/vomiting, worsening memory). Logistic regression was used to assess the independent associations between willingness to bear adversity and ACC., Results: Of the 524 patients aged 70 to 96 years, approximately 5.3% reported that there was a 100% chance that their cancer would be cured (ACC). ACC was not found to be significantly associated with willingness to bear treatment-related toxicities, but was more common among patients who were willing to trade QOL for survival (adjusted odds ratio, 4.08; 95% CI, 1.17-14.26)., Conclusions: Patients who were more willing to bear adversity in the form of an abstract state, namely decreased QOL, were more likely to demonstrate ACC. Although conversations regarding prognosis should be conducted with all patients, those who are willing to trade QOL for survival may especially benefit from conversations that focus on values and emotions., (© 2019 American Cancer Society.)

Progesterone was assayed in samples of saliva collected daily throughout the menstrual cycle and correlated with corresponding daily concentrations of pregnanediol-3 alpha-glucuronide in early morning urine. Ovarian follicular growth was monitored on a daily basis with a real-time sector scanner. The concentrations of salivary progesterone shows a specific pattern with a mid-cycle rise and a peak in the luteal phase. The mean concentration in the follicular phase, as determined, was 40.4 pmol/l (range 15.3-110.7 pmol/l). It increased in the peri-ovulatory period to a peak of 201.1 pmol/l (range 46.4-289.8 pmol/l) 6 days following follicular rupture.

A major function of calcitonin in humans appears to be maintenance of the skeleton. There is a marked sex difference in circulating calcitonin levels: women have much lower levels. This has led to speculation that calcitonin lack may be one factor involved in the pathogenesis of postmenopausal bone loss. We have measured levels of calcitonin and the other major calcium-regulating hormones in healthy women during the early menopause, and studied the effects of reversing their oestrogen deficiency with natural and synthetic oestrogen. The major findings were that calcitonin levels were increased by oestrogen administration (P less than 0.02-less than 0.001) and that the levels of the bone-resorbing hormones, parathyroid hormone and 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D, were not higher in postmenopausal than in premenopausal women. We suggest that loss of oestrogen at the menopause accelerates the natural age-related decline of calcitonin secretion, thus further decreasing the calcitonin levels. This leads to increased sensitivity of the skeleton to the actions of the bone-resorbing hormones. It seems likely that the well-known effect of oestrogen in preventing postmenopausal bone loss is achieved, at least in part, by enhancement of calcitonin secretion.