Search

Objective Aspects of ileal pouch surgery remain controversial. The authors' single practice experience of 107 operations illustrates many of them. It was hoped that its study would contribute usefully to the debate. Patients and methods Details of all 107 restorative proctocolectomies carried out since the operation was started in Gloucester in 1984 until the study period ended have been kept prospectively. All patients had proctectomy by mesorectal dissection, and 106 had W pouch restoration. Four suffered functional failure requiring reversion to ileostomy and three patients have died. The remaining 99 were sent a questionnaire concerning pelvic visceral function and evidence of pouchitis. Records of all but one of the patients have been reviewed. Results Surgical morbidity was low with neither chronic pelvic sepsis, pouch related fistula, pouch haemorrhage nor pouch ischaemia. Mucosectomised patients had similar bowel control to the stapled group. The policy change from routine to selective protective ileostomy proved satisfactory. W pouch function was found to be comparable to that reported from major J pouch series, although anti-diarrhoeal usage was reduced, and was not influenced by either gender, age or time since surgery. Conclusion None of the following reasonably intuitive assumptions seem supported by our findings: that mesorectal excision necessarily poses a greater danger to pelvic visceral function than close rectal dissection, that the greater capacity of W pouches will be reflected in markedly less frequency, that mucosectomy would impair anal control, or that a defunctioning ileostomy is a mandatory precaution. Pouch frequency is less if wind can be passed separately; otherwise functional outcome seems determined by other, non-technical, factors.

Introduction Parastomal herniation is not uncommon and numerous surgical approaches to the problem have been employed including mesh reinforcement. Bowel wall erosion is a worrying potential complication of placing an edge of mesh around bowel. To reduce this possibility a simple modification is suggested. Method The polyproylene mesh repair is fashioned on the posterior rectus sheath. The required aperture for the bowel is marked appropriately on the mesh. Instead of simple removal of the marked circle, the aperture is fashioned by folding back and stitching in place the triangular flaps from the middle to form a rolled rather than sharp edge. Non-absorbable monofilament stitches reconstitute the mesh encirclement, and attach it laterally and medially to the aponeurotic tissue. A review of the case notes was conducted and each patient was contacted by a postal questionnaire. Results This technique has been used in 10 patients (7 end colostomies, 2 end ileostomies and 1 loop ileostomy) since 2000. Over a median follow-up period of 30 months (range 2 to 40 months) there have been no hernia recurrences, no infected meshes, no bowel damage attributable to the mesh and no troubles with stoma. The only complication encountered has been a segment of superficial wound breakdown in one patient. Conclusions This technique appears to offer a safe and reliable modification for mesh repair of parastomal herniation, in being designed to obviate the possibility of erosion of the stomal bowel wall by a sharp mesh edge but at the same time providing a sound herniorrhaphy by complete encirclement.