Search

Background: Smoking cessation is the most important treatment for smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but little is known about the effectiveness of different smoking cessation interventions for this particular group of patients., Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in people with COPD., Search Strategy: Electronic searches were undertaken on MEDLINE (from 1966 to March 2002), EMBASE (from 1989 to March 2002) and Psyclit (from 1971 to March 2002), and CENTRAL (Issue 1, 2002)., Selection Criteria: Randomised controlled trials in which smoking cessation was assessed in participants with confirmed COPD., Data Collection and Analysis: Two authors extracted the data and performed the methodological quality assessment independently for each study, with disagreements resolved by consensus. High-quality was defined, based on pre-set criteria according to the DelphiList., Main Results: Five studies were included in this systematic review, two of which were of high-quality. The high-quality studies show the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions combined with pharmacological intervention compared to no treatment: psychosocial interventions combined with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and a bronchodilator versus no treatment at a 5 year follow-up (RD = 0.16, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.18), (RR = 4.0, 95% CI 3.25 to 4.93), psychosocial interventions combined with NRT and placebo versus no treatment at a 5 year follow-up (RD = 0.17, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.19), (RR = 4.19, 95% CI 3.41 to 5.15). Furthermore the results show the effectiveness of various combinations of psychosocial and pharmacological interventions at a 6 months follow-up (RD = 0.07, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.13), (RR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.0). Unfortunately, none of the included studies compared psychosocial interventions with no treatment. Therefore we found no evidence with regard to the effectiveness of these interventions., Reviewer's Conclusions: Based on this systematic review, the authors found evidence that a combination of psychosocial interventions and pharmacological interventions is superior to no treatment or to psychosocial interventions alone. Furthermore we conclude that there is no clear or convincing evidence for the effectiveness of any psychosocial intervention for patients with COPD due to lack of a sufficient number of high-quality studies.

Calcium has been proposed to prevent colon cancer in subjects at risk for this tumour. This effect is supposed to be due at least in part to binding the bile acids to calcium, making them insoluble and harmless. To evaluate the effects of oral calcium supplementation on intestinal bile acids, 19 patients with adenomatous colonic polyps were supplemented with 35.5 mmol Ca2+ daily for 12 weeks. Duodenal bile, 24-h feces and 24-h urine were collected before and at the end of the 12-week period. In duodenal bile proportional concentration of cholic acid increased (38 +/- 4 vs. 51 +/- 3%, P < 0.001), whereas that of chenodeoxycholic acid decreased (35 +/- 3 vs. 25 +/- 2%, P < 0.01). Total fecal bile acid excretion increased (950 +/- 126 vs. 1218 +/- 137 mumol 24 h-1, P < 0.01), with proportional concentrations of the main primary and secondary bile acids remaining the same. Cytolytic activity of fecal water, measured by the degree of lysis of erythrocytes by the water, decreased (45 +/- 8 vs. 30 +/- 7%, P < 0.05). Total excretion of calcium increased as expected from the supplementary dose. It is concluded that calcium supplementation markedly affects intestinal bile acids and lytic activity of fecal water and that, in view of similar results during 1-week calcium supplementation in young healthy subjects, these effects remain constant over at least 3 months and occur both in healthy persons and in patients at increased risk for colon cancer.