Search

BACKGROUND Exome and targeted sequencing studies have identified potential driver mutations for a variety of tumor types. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is one of the most highly mutated cancers but typically is associated with low rates of metastasis and high survival rates. Nevertheless, metastatic cSCC is a significant health threat; up to 8800 individuals die each year of this disease. METHODS Because it is difficult to predict which cSCCs are more likely to metastasize, and because to the best of the authors' knowledge there are no targeted therapies specifically designated for patients with metastatic cSCC, exome and/or targeted sequencing of 18 metastatic and 10 primary cSCCs was performed to identify mutations that were more frequent in metastatic tumors and might be targeted for therapeutic benefit. The authors compared their results with published sequencing results of an additional 223 primary tumors and 68 metastatic cSCCs. RESULTS The authors identified genes demonstrating higher mutation frequencies in metastatic cSCC compared with primary tumors, including the chromatin remodeling gene lysine methyltransferase 2D (KMT2D) and the classic skin tumor suppressor tumor protein p53 (TP53), which was found to be mutated in 54% of primary tumors compared with 85% of metastatic tumors (P

BACKGROUND A Phase I study using weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine was conducted to investigate toxicity; to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of each agent; and, in a preliminary fashion, to determine the antitumor activity of the combination. METHODS Docetaxel and gemcitabine were administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The dose levels of docetaxel and gemcitabine were as follows: Level I, docetaxel 20 mg/m2and gemcitabine 400 mg/m2; Level II, docetaxel 30 mg/m2and gemcitabine 400 mg/m2; Level III, docetaxel 30 mg/m2and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2; Level IV, docetaxel 36 mg/m2and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2; and Level V, docetaxel 36 mg/m2and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2. RESULTS Thirty-three eligible patients were entered. The diagnoses were as follows: Eleven patients had nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, 3 patients had carcinoma of the bladder, 3 patients had renal carcinoma, 2 patients had adrenal carcinoma, 5 patients had unknown primary tumors, and 9 patients had miscellaneous malignancies. Fifty-nine percent of patients had received prior chemotherapy. The median age was 62 years (range, 27–77 years), and the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 (range, 0–1). Five patients were treated at Dose Levels I and II, 6 patients were treated at Dose Levels III and V, and 11 patients were treated at Dose Level IV. Grade 3–4 toxicities during Cycle I included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, and diarrhea. Dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, occurred in three of six patients at Dose Level V. The combination of docetaxel 36 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 (Dose Level IV) was determined as the MTD and was the recommended Phase II dose. Two patients had a partial response: one patient with bladder carcinoma (Dose Level II) and one patient with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (Dose Level III). CONCLUSIONS Overall, weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine were well tolerated. Further studies using this combination are planned, including a Phase II trial in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 2003;97:170–8. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10991

BACKGROUND To test the hypothesis that the cytoprotectant amifostine attenuates the thrombocytopenia produced by carboplatin, the authors performed a randomized trial comparing treatment with carboplatin alone versus the combination of amifostine and carboplatin. METHODS Patients with refractory or carboplatin-sensitive malignancies were randomized to receive either carboplatin, 500 mg/m2 alone or carboplatin, 500 mg/m2 in conjunction with 2 doses of amifostine of 910 mg/m2 each. RESULTS Fifty-five patients with a variety of malignancies were entered on this study. One patient withdrew from each arm prior to the administration of any therapy, leaving 30 evaluable patients treated with carboplatin alone and 23 treated with the combination of amifostine and carboplatin. For 82 cycles of therapy with amifostine plus carboplatin, the median platelet nadir was 127 × 109/L while the median platelet nadir was 88 × 109/L over the 80 courses of therapy with carboplatin alone (P = 0.023). The median platelet nadir after the first cycle of therapy was 144 × 109/L for patients treated with amifostine plus carboplatin and 85 × 109/L for patients treated with carboplatin alone (P = 0.24). The median survival for 9 patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma treated with carboplatin alone was 39 weeks whereas the median survival for 12 such patients treated with amifostine plus carboplatin was 52 weeks (P = 0.116). CONCLUSIONS These data support the hypothesis that amifostine attenuates the myelosuppression of carboplatin. Additional studies of amifostine in combination with carboplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens are warranted. Cancer 1997; 80:1134-40. © 1997 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUND Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a cytokine that is involved in the differentiation and proliferation of various hematopoietic precursors. It also has been reported to enhance the antitumor activity of various mature effector cells. Previous reports have noted preclinical antitumor activity in a murine model utilizing genetically engineered tumor cells and instances of tumor regression in patients with solid tumors receiving GM-CSF. In the present study, a Phase II trial of human recombinant GM-CSF (GM-CSFrh) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was conducted to investigate further the potential antitumor activity of this cytokine. METHODS Twenty-six eligible patients with metastatic RCC received 3 μg/kg of GM-CSFrh subcutaneously for 14 days, with cycles repeated every 28 days. RESULTS Two of 26 patients (8%; 95% confidence interval 1–25%) demonstrated partial tumor responses during GM-CSFrh therapy. Both individuals who responded had received prior therapy. A median of three cycles per patient were administered, and toxicity was mild. CONCLUSIONS GM-CSFrh may mediate tumor regression in patients with metastatic RCC; however, the level of activity in previously treated patients is low. Cancer 1996;77:1149-53.