Search

Objectives To evaluate whether low testosterone levels or obesity, or both, are directly associated with tumor stage/grade in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Methods Preoperative androgen serum levels (total and free testosterone), sex hormone-binding globulin, body mass index and waist circumference were assessed in 510 consecutive European Caucasian men treated with radical prostatectomy. Hormone levels and body mass index/waist circumference were correlated with patient- and tumor-specific characteristics using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results Even though we confirmed an inverse correlation between bodyweight and testosterone levels, only overweight – but not low testosterone – was associated with advanced disease and poor differentiation of prostate cancer. Using multivariate analyses, both body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 and waist circumference >110 cm were associated with high-grade disease (Gleason score ≥8). A waist circumference >110 cm also correlated significantly with lymph node metastasis. Conclusions This is the first study showing that obesity, but not low serum testosterone levels, is significantly associated with high grade and metastatic disease in men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer. The present findings suggest that low androgen levels at diagnosis, which used to be held responsible for the development of aggressive prostate cancer, is only an epiphenomenon of obesity rather than the cause of prostate cancer development and/or progression.

The study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness, toxicity and optimal duration of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with organ-confined or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted agents. A literature review was carried out using Medline/Pubmed articles, as well as congress reports from the last five American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Urological Association and European Association of Urology Annual Meetings. Neoadjuvant targeted therapy is feasible and shows toxicity similar to that seen in a palliative setting. Most studies recommend an application for 2-4 months. The current data situation is best for sunitinib. Surgery can apparently be carried out the day right after discontinuing the drug. However, even sunitinib leads to only a mean 10% decrease in primary tumor size, and one-quarter to one-fifth of all patients show local tumor progression during treatment. Few patients (approximately 12%) with a vena cava tumor thrombus achieve a significant decrease in its level under neoadjuvant therapy; here too, progression is observed in a significant number of cases. Even the new targeted agents show limited effectiveness in achieving relevant remissions of the primary tumor. Furthermore, tumor progression is seen in a significant percentage of patients during neoadjuvant therapy. Thus, even today in the era of targeted agents, a neoadjuvant approach should only be made in patients with localized or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma, which primarily seem to be absolutely inaccessible by (partial) nephrectomy.