Search

The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of a stable concentration of propofol on interictal high-frequency oscillations (HFOs), which may contribute to identifying the epileptogenic zone intraoperatively for resection surgery. Nine patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent invasive pre-surgical evaluation with chronic subdural electrodes were recruited. Five-minute electrocorticograms during wakefulness, slow-wave sleep, and under a stable brain concentration of propofol were recorded with the same electrodes. In each patient, 1-10 pairs of electrodes were selected for both electrodes with EEG changes within 5 seconds from the ictal onset (ictal pattern for 5 seconds [IP5]) and those outside the area of IP5 with no interictal epileptiform discharges (non-epileptiform [nEPI]). The numbers of ripples (80-250 Hz) and fast ripples (>250 Hz) were measured semi-automatically using an established algorithm. Statistical testing was performed with a mixed effect model. Thirty-seven pairs of electrodes from nine patients were analysed for IP5 and 29 pairs from seven patients were analysed for nEPI. The numbers of HFOs differed between the areas (IP5 and nEPI) and among the conditions (wakefulness, slow-wave sleep, propofol anaesthesia) (all p

In order to preserve postoperative language function, we recently proposed a new intraoperative method to monitor the integrity of the dorsal language pathway (arcuate fasciculus; AF) using cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs). Based on further investigations (20 patients, 21 CCEP investigations), including patients who were not suitable for awake surgery (five CCEP investigations) or those without preoperative neuroimaging data (eight CCEP investigations including four with untraceable tractography due to brain edema), we attempted to clarify the clinical impact of this new intraoperative method. We monitored the integrity of AF by stimulating the anterior perisylvian language area (AL) by recording CCEPs from the posterior perisylvian language area (PL) consecutively during both general anesthesia and awake condition. After tumor resection, single-pulse electrical stimuli were also applied to the floor of the removal cavity to record subcortico-cortical evoked potentials (SCEPs) at AL and PL in 12 patients (12 SCEP investigations). We demonstrated that (1) intraoperative dorsal language network monitoring was feasible even when patients were not suitable for awake surgery or without preoperative neuroimaging studies, (2) CCEP is a dynamic marker of functional connectivity or integrity of AF, and CCEP N1 amplitude could even become larger after reduction of brain edema, (3) a 50% CCEP N1 amplitude decline might be a cut-off value to prevent permanent language dysfunction due to impairment of AF, (4) a correspondence (

Objective We aimed at clarifying the clinical significance of the responses evoked by human entorhinal cortex (EC) electrical stimulation by means of cortico‐cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs). Methods We enrolled nine patients with medically intractable medial temporal lobe epilepsy who underwent invasive presurgical evaluations with subdural or depth electrodes. Single‐pulse electrical stimulation was delivered to the EC and fusiform gyrus (FG), and their evoked potentials were compared. The correlation between the evoked potentials and Wechsler Memory Scale‐Revised (WMS‐R) score was analyzed to investigate whether memory circuit was involved in the generation of the evoked potentials. Results In most electrodes placed on the neocortex, EC stimulation induced unique evoked potentials with positive polarity, termed as “widespread P1” (P1w). Compared with FG stimulation, P1w induced by EC stimulation were distinguished by their high occurrence rate, short peak latency (mean: 20.1 ms), small peak amplitude, and waveform uniformity among different recording sites. A stimulation of more posterior parts of the EC induced P1w with shorter latency and larger amplitude. P1w peak amplitude had a positive correlation (r = .69) with the visual memory score of the WMS‐R. In one patient, with depth electrode implanted into the hippocampus, the giant evoked potentials were recorded in the electrodes of the anterior hippocampus and EC near the stimulus site. Conclusions The human EC electrical stimulation evoked the short‐latency potentials in the broad neocortical regions. The origin of P1w remains unclear, although the limited evidence suggests that P1w is the far‐field potential by the volume conduction of giant evoked potential from the EC itself and hippocampus. The significance of the present study is that those evoked potentials may be a potential biomarker of memory impairment in various neurological diseases, and we provided direct evidence for the functional subdivisions along the anterior–posterior axis in the human EC.