Search

Recent advances in high-intensity focused ultrasound, which was developed in the 1940s as a viable thermal tissue ablation approach, have increased its popularity. High-intensity focused ultrasound is currently utilized the most in Europe and Japan, but has not yet been approved by the Food and Drug Administration, USA, for this indication. The purpose of the present report is to review the scientific foundation of high-intensity focused ultrasound technology and the clinical outcomes achieved with commercially available devices. Recently published articles were reviewed to evaluate the current status of high-intensity focused ultrasound as a primary or salvage treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Improvements in the clinical outcome as a result of technical, imaging and technological advancements are described herein. A wide range of treatment options for organ-confined prostate cancer is available. However, high-intensity focused ultrasound is an attractive choice for men willing to choose less invasive options, although establishing the efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound requires longer follow-up periods. Technological advances, together with cultural and economic factors, have caused a dramatic shift from traditional open, radical prostatectomy to minimally invasive techniques. High-intensity focused ultrasound is likely to play a significant role in the future of oncology practice.

OBJECTIVE To examine the incidence, timing, and magnitude of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ‘bounce’ after permanent prostate brachytherapy (BT) and correlate the PSA bounce with clinical and dosimetric factors in Japanese patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multi-institutional pooled analysis was carried out in 388 consecutive patients with T1–T2N0M0 prostate cancer treated with 125I-seed implant BT with no hormonal therapy or external beam radiotherapy. All patients had ≥1 year of follow-up and at least three follow-up PSA level measurements. Three definitions of PSA bounce were used: definition A, a PSA level rise of 0.1 ng/mL; definition B, a PSA level rise of 0.4 ng/mL; and definition C, a PSA level rise of 35% over the previous value, followed by a subsequent fall. RESULTS The actuarial likelihood of having PSA bounce at 24 months was 50.8% for definition A, 23.5% for definition B, and 19.4% for definition C. The median time to develop PSA bounce was 12 months for definition A, 18 months for definition B, and 18 months for definition C. There was a PSA bounce magnitude of 2 ng/mL in 5.3% of patients, and 95.3% of PSA bounce occurred within 24 months after 125I-BT. Among the before and after 125I-BT factors, clinical stage, initial PSA level, and Gleason score did not predict for PSA bounce using any definition; only being younger predicted for PSA bounce on multivariate analysis (P

Objectives: We report that a combination of gemcitabine and paclitaxel will effectively treat patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) who have been previously treated with methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin (MVAC). The objective of this study was to assess the tumor responses, toxicity, and overall survival of these patients as second-line treatment. Methods: Ten eligible patients were enrolled in this study. All patients had been previously treated with MVAC. Patients received paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15. The treatment was repeated every 21 days. Tumors were assessed every two cycles by imaging study. Results: The median number of treatment courses was 4 (range 2–7). Two patients had complete response and five patients had partial response after two courses of treatment. Median overall survival was 10.3 months. Median overall survival from the first MVAC was 19.1 months. Median progression-free survival was 4.1 months. Of the seven responders, median progression-free survival was 7.4 months. Myelosuppresion was the most common toxicity. Nonhematologic toxicity consisted of hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel. There were no therapy-related deaths. Conclusions: Gemcitabine and paclitaxel chemotherapy is a favorable therapeutic alternative for patients with advanced or metastatic UC who have previously been treated with MVAC chemotherapy. Given the safety and benefit profile seen in this study, a large prospective research study is warranted to consider the potential role of gemcitabine and paclitaxel chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for urothelial cancer.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to use computer simulation to investigate the optimal biopsy scheme for enhancing the detection of cancer in palpably benign prostate glands. Methods: The predominant distribution of palpably benign prostate cancer is anterior apex to mid-prostate. We used computer simulation to optimize apical samplings and to simulate the biopsy procedure, including angle and length. A total of 254 consecutive patients with palpably benign prostate glands underwent sextant biopsy plus two additional deep apical biopsies. Results: Based on the computer simulation, lateral sextant and two additional medially located deep apical cores with a sagittal penetration angle of 80° had the maximum cancer detection. Of the 254 patients, 58 (22.8%) had prostate cancer: 28 (48.3%) were positive only at the standard sextant sites, 12 (20.7%) were positive exclusively at the deep apical sites, and the remaining 18 (31.0%) were positive at both sites. Patients with gray-zone prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ranges of 4.1–10.0 ng/mL had increased cancer detection rates of 24% compared to sextant biopsy. Enhanced cancer detection by the deep apical biopsy was also evident in patients with a prostatic volume >40 cm3 (by 36.4%) and PSA 2.1–4.0 ng/mL (by 13.3%). Conclusions: Using a computer simulation-based biopsy scheme with deep apical sampling cores enhanced the detection of prostate cancer in palpably benign glands, especially in men with PSA ranges of 4.1–10.0 ng/mL or a gland volume of >40 cm3. Our approach with fewer sampling cores may have been more cost-effective than other extensive biopsy schemes, but further studies with larger samples are warranted.

Background: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a minimally invasive technique used in achieve coagulation necrosis. We evaluated biochemical disease-free survival rates, predictors of clinical outcome and morbidity in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with HIFU. Methods: A total of 181 consecutive patients underwent HIFU with the use of Sonablate (Focus Surgery, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the criteria recommended by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. The median age and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level were 70 years (range 44–88) and 9.76 ng/mL (range 3.39–89.60). A total of 95 patients (52%) were treated with neoadjuvant hormones. The median follow-up period for all patients was 18.0 months (range 4–68). Results: The biochemical disease-free survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years in all patients were 84%, 80% and 78%, respectively. The biochemical disease-free survival rates at 3 years for patients with pretreatment PSA less than 10 ng/mL, 10.01–20.0 ng/mL and more than 20.0 ng/mL were 94%, 75% and 35%, respectively (P

To evaluate the biochemical disease-free survival (DFS), predictors of clinical outcome and morbidity of patients with localized prostate cancer treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), a noninvasive treatment that induces complete coagulative necrosis of a tumour at depth through the intact skin.In all, 63 patients with stage T1c-2bN0M0 localized prostate cancer underwent HIFU using the Sonablate system (Focus Surgery, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA). None of the patients received neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy. Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the criteria recommended by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition, i.e. three consecutive increases in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after the nadir. The median (range) age, PSA level and follow-up were 71 (45-87) years, 8.5 (3.39-57.0) ng/mL and 22.0 (3-63) months, respectively.The overall biochemical disease-free rate was 75% (47 patients). The 3-year biochemical DFS rates for patients with a PSA level before HIFU of10, 10.01-20 and20 ng/mL were 82%, 62% and 20% (P0.001), respectively. The 3-year biochemical DFS rates for patients with a PSA nadir of0.2, 0.21-1 and1 ng/mL were 100%, 74% and 21% (P0.001), respectively. Final follow-up sextant biopsies showed that 55 (87%) of the patients were cancer-free. Multivariate analysis showed that the PSA nadir (P0.001) was a significant independent predictor of relapse.HIFU therapy appears to be a safe, effective and minimally invasive therapy for patients with localized prostate cancer, and the PSA nadir is a useful predictor of clinical outcome.

We report a case of dissemination of prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in an 80-year-old patient. The patient presented at hospital because of nocturia. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy was carried out because of high serum prostate-specific antigen (3.55 ng/mL), but it showed no malignancies. Benign prostate hyperplasia was diagnosed, and he was started on an α1-blocker. Although the urinary symptom improved with silodosin, acute urinary retention occurred 3 years after therapy began. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for relief of bladder outlet obstruction enabled discharge of urine. Pathological examination of the resected tissue found adenocarcinoma with a high Gleason score, 4 + 5. Serum alkaline phosphatase increased rapidly after holmium laser enucleation, and bone scintigraphy confirmed multiple bone metastases. Prostate cancer, T1bN0M1b, was diagnosed.

A 58-year-old man who had undergone left adrenalectomy 2 years previously for adrenocortical carcinoma was diagnosed to have a left suprarenal solid mass. Thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic excision of the tumor was conducted under the diagnosis of isolated local recurrence of adrenal carcinoma. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The patient subsequently received three courses of adjuvant chemotherapy. There have been no signs of tumor recurrence during 3 years follow up after surgery. This approach provides a minimally invasive alternative to an open thoracoabdominal procedure after prior open surgery.

Objective • To investigate the safety and immune responses of 12 consecutive weeks of once-weekly personalized peptide vaccine (PPV) administration in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) for whom therapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin (MVAC) has failed. Patients and methods • A phase I trial was designed. Ten patients with MVAC-refractory advanced or metastatic UC were treated with weekly personalized peptide vaccine 12 times using positive peptides chosen from 14 and 16 peptides in patients with human leucocyte antigens A24 and A2, respectively. • Peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor analysis by interferon-γ production and peptide-reactive immunoglobulin G (IgG) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was monitored during the treatment. Results • The peptide vaccination was safe and well tolerated with no major adverse effects. Increased cytotoxic T lymphocyte response and the anti-peptide IgG titre were revealed by the post-vaccination sera in eight patients. • Clinical responses were as follows: one complete response, one partial response, two stable disease and six progressive disease. • Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.0 and 8.9 months, respectively. In the four responders, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 21 and 24 months, respectively. Conclusions • This phase I study showed the safety of and boosted immune responses in response to PPV for advanced UC. • The potential efficacy of 12 consecutive weekly vaccinations with PPV in patients with advanced UC merits further investigation based on these findings.