Search

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of smoking cessation interventions on tobacco smoking in adults receiving inpatient psychiatry treatment. To assess whether the effects of smoking cessation interventions differ according to psychiatric diagnosis or type of intervention or comparator condition., (Copyright © 2024 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

This methodological discussion invites critical reflection about the procedures used to analyze the contribution of qualitative and mixed methods research to nursing trials by mounting an argument that these should rest on multiple publications produced about a project, rather than a single article. We illustrate the value-added of this approach with findings from a qualitative, cross-case analysis of three critical case exemplars from nursing researchers that each used a qualitative approach with a mixed method phase. The holistic lens afforded by a case-based approach informs nursing inquiry by documenting that the critical case exemplars presented evidence of (a) a sustained commitment of resources and expertise for the qualitative methods that extended across more than one phase of the trial, (b) the impact of the qualitative methods on the trial or its aftermath, (c) deploying a theoretical or conceptual framework for a variety of purposes, and (d) integrating qualitative and quantitative data for purposes of extending explanatory power. Findings challenge the practice of linking purposes served by qualitative and mixed methods to a single trial phase., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To assess the methodological quality of intervention-focused systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) published in high-impact otolaryngology journals., Data Sources: Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library., Review Methods: A comprehensive search was performed for SR and MA citations from 2012 to 2017 in the 10 highest impact factor otolaryngology journals. Abstracts were screened to identify published manuscripts in which the authors indicated clearly that they were performing an SR or MA. Applying a modified typology of reviews, 4 reviewers characterized the review type as SR, MA, or another review type. A simplified version of the AMSTAR 2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2) tool was used to assess the reporting and methodological quality of the SRs and MAs that were focused on interventions., Results: Search and abstract screening generated 499 manuscripts that identified themselves as performing an SR or MA. A substantial number (85/499, 17%) were review types other than SRs or MAs, including 34 (7%) that were literature reviews. In total, 236 SRs and MAs focused on interventions. Over 50% of these SRs and MAs had weaknesses in at least 3 of the 16 items in the AMSTAR 2, and over 40% had weaknesses in at least 2 of the 7 critical domains. Ninety-nine percent of SRs and MAs provided critically low confidence in the results of the reviews., Conclusion: Intervention-focused SRs and MAs published in high-impact otolaryngology journals have important methodological limitations that diminish confidence in the results of these reviews.

Objectives: The primary objective of the proposed systematic review is to determine if there is an association between internalizing disorders and symptoms (ie, subclinical symptoms) and migraine in children and adolescents., Methods: We will perform a peer-reviewed Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from inception to December 2019. The authors will also review all reference lists of included studies for relevant citations. Observational studies on the association of pediatric migraine with internalizing disorders and symptoms will be included in this review. Case-control, cohort, and cross-sectional studies that include participants aged 18 years and under will be eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome for this systematic review will be migraine and the exposures of interest will include internalizing disorders (eg, major depressive disorder, dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder) and internalizing symptoms (depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, obsessive compulsive symptoms, and post-traumatic stress symptoms). Two investigators will independently carry out an initial screen of abstracts, followed by a second screen of full-text manuscripts. Data extraction will be completed by 2 independent investigators. Study quality will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa criteria for case-control and cohort studies and using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa criteria for cross-sectional studies. A narrative synthesis of the data will be provided and, if possible, data will be quantitatively summarized using appropriate meta-analytic methods. Throughout the manuscript, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis reporting standards will be followed., Results: The goal of this systematic review will be to provide a narrative, and if possible, quantitative summary on the association between pediatric migraine and internalizing disorders and symptoms., Conclusions: The methods applied in this systematic review protocol can be used to inform the design of future systematic reviews of observational studies in headache medicine. The results of this systematic review will be used to inform the clinical community on the association between pediatric migraine and internalizing disorders and symptoms and may also be used to inform the design of future research studies in this area., (© 2020 American Headache Society.)