Search

Large analyses of T4 larynx cancer (LC) have raised concerns that larynx preservation (LP) contributes to reduced survival compared with laryngectomy (LGX). The role of operability has not been previously considered as a confounder.We queried the National Cancer Database for T4M0 LC diagnosed 2004-2015. Patients were categorized as undergoing LGX, chemoradiotherapy but operable (LP-operable), and chemoradiotherapy inoperable (LP-inoperable). Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier. Cox multivariate analysis (MVA) identified variables associated with OS.We identified 1405 LGX, 164 LP-operable and 1969 LP-inoperable patients. Compared with LGX, MVA demonstrated worse OS among LP-inoperable (HR 1.28 95%CI 1.17-1.40, p 0.01) but not LP-operable patients (HR 1.12 95%CI 0.91-1.39, p = 0.28).LP-operable patients did not have significantly worse OS than those undergoing LGX.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH) is a rare vascular tumor of unknown etiology and unpredictable natural history. To date, no large-scale studies have been published evaluating this disease due to its rare occurrence. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was reviewed between 2004 and 2016 to identify patients with HEH. Univariate analysis with overall survival (OS) was performed by Cox proportional hazards model. Kaplan–Meier method was used to create OS curves and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: We identified 229 patients with HEH. The majority of patients were female (61.1%), white (84.3%), and had a Charlson–Deyo score of 0 (75%). Chemotherapeutic intervention was seen in 26% of the patients while 33% received surgical intervention in the form of wedge/segmental liver resection (n = 27), hepatectomy lobectomy/extended lobectomy (n = 18), and liver transplant (n = 22). Five-year survival in surgical patients was 90.5%, 66.5% and 81%, respectively (p = 0.485). Age greater than 55 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.78; p < 0.001), Asian ethnicity compared to white (HR, 2.84; p = 0.012), and a higher Charlson–Deyo score (score 1: HR, 2.28; p < 0.001 and score ≥2: HR, 2.76; p = 0.011) were associated with worse OS. CONCLUSION: Treatment for HEH remains variable with only a third of the patients undergoing surgery. International collaboration is necessary to determine the optimal treatment for this rare disease.

Melphalan is an alkylating agent used in both autologous (ASCT) and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. It is a substrate of L-type amino acid transporter-1 (LAT-1) and LAT-2, which are involved in its tissue penetration and elimination. Gabapentin and pregabalin, common concomitant medications in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing ASCT, are also substrates of LAT transporters, raising concern for potential competitive inhibition of melphalan transport. We evaluated whether concurrent use of gabapentin or pregabalin in patients receiving high-dose melphalan (≥140 mg/mWe aimed to determine if concurrent administration of gabapentin or pregabalin and melphalan increased melphalan toxicity.This was a single-center, retrospective evaluation including patients ≥18 years of age who received high-dose melphalan as part of a conditioning regimen at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University between August 1, 2010 and April 1, 2020 and were followed through their transplant admission. After identification and inclusion of patients who received melphalan in combination with gabapentin or pregabalin, patient matching based on age (±5 years), sex, and melphalan dose (140 mg/mAmong 176 patients evaluated in each group, median hospital LOS was 16 days, median time to neutrophil engraftment was 14 days, and median time to platelet-20 engraftment was 16 days in both groups. In addition, there were no significant differences in supportive care requirements between groups.In this study, use of gabapentin or pregabalin in combination with melphalan did not impact safety of the conditioning regimen in patients undergoing ASCT.

INTRODUCTION: Following resection of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) distant recurrence remains high. We utilized the national cancer database (NCDB) to evaluate the role of systemic therapy in early-stage resected PACC. METHODS: We queried the NCDB registry from 2004 to 2015 for patients with pathologic stage I-IIB PACC. For each stage, patients who underwent surgery alone (SA) were compared to patients who received systemic and/or radiation therapy in addition to surgery (surgery + therapy [S + T]). RESULTS: A total of 271 patients (101 pI, 81 pIIA, and 89 pIIB) were analyzed. Of all clinically node positive patients (n = 41), the majority (n = 32, 78%) had node-positive disease at resection (pIIB). SA was performed in 112 patients (41.3%), whereas 159 (58.7%) patients received S + T. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between S + T and SA with respect to pI or pIIA disease. In pIIB disease, S + T was associated with improved OS compared to SA (34.9 vs. 16.9 months, p = 0.031). Single-agent chemotherapy was associated with improved OS for pIIB disease when compared to SA (hazard ratio: 0.38, 95% confidence interval: 0.16, 0.83). CONCLUSION: In resectable PACC, the survival benefit of adjuvant therapy is limited to pathologic stage IIB disease. This benefit is evident even in patients treated with single-agent chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: While most patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) receive therapy shortly after diagnosis, a subset of patients with indolent-behaving disease can safely defer treatment. In this subgroup, we evaluated the importance of treatment intensity in patients with MCL who defer initial therapy. METHODS: Out of 1134 patients with MCL from 12 academic centers, we analyzed 219 patients who initiated therapy at least 90 days after diagnosis. Patients who received induction with high-dose cytarabine and/or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first remission were considered to have received intensive therapy (n = 88) while all other approaches were non-intensive (n = 131). RESULTS: There was no difference in progression-free (PFS; P = .224) or overall survival (OS; P = .167) in deferred patients who received non-intensive vs. intensive therapy. Additionally, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were performed for PFS and OS. Treatment at an academic center (HR 0.43, P = .015) was associated with improved OS in both univariate and multivariate models, while intensity of treatment was not associated with improved OS in either model. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that intensified initial treatment is not associated with improved survival after deferring initial therapy, although prospective studies are needed to determine which of these patients with MCL may benefit from intensive therapy.

Background To the authors' knowledge, race-based differences in efficacy for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not been studied to date due to the underrepresentation of patients of minority backgrounds in pivotal trials. In the current study, the authors examined real-world differences in outcome in a diverse patient population. Methods The authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with single-agent immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) between 2013 and July 2018 at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia. Primary efficacy comparison between Black patients and White patients was performed using bivariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Data from 257 patients were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 69 years; 50.6% of the patients were female, 63.4% were White, 29.5% were Black, and 7.1% of the patients were of "other" race. ICB was the first-line treatment in 51 patients (19.9%), the second-line treatment in 161 patients (62.6%), and the third-line treatment in 33 patients (12.9%). The most commonly used agents were nivolumab (49.0%), pembrolizumab (25.2%), and atezolizumab (21.3%). No differences with regard to OS (P = .839) and PFS (P = .235) were noted between Black and White patients. The sample overall response rate was 20.6% (15.2% in Black patients and 23.1% in White patients). No differences with regard to OS (P = .081) and PFS (P = .176) were observed between female and male patients. The rate of immune-related adverse events was found to be similar in Black and White patients (20.0% vs 29.9%; P = .148). On multivariate analysis, race was not found to be significantly associated with OS or PFS. Conclusions Real-world analysis of the authors' institutional experience demonstrated similar efficacy and tolerability of ICB in Black versus White patients with advanced NSCLC. Larger multi-institutional studies including other US minority populations would make the findings of the current study more generalizable.