1. Kinematic assessment of an elastic-core cervical disc prosthesis in one and two-level constructs
- Author
-
Gerard Carandang, Richard D. Guyer, Saeed Khayatzadeh, Kenneth R. Blank, Robert M. Havey, Avinash G. Patwardhan, Nick Padovani, Josh Rubin, Leonard I. Voronov, and Stephanie Werner
- Subjects
medicine.medical_treatment ,degeneration ,Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ,motion preservation ,Kinematics ,Prosthesis ,biomechanics ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cadaver ,Medicine ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Research Articles ,030222 orthopedics ,Core (anatomy) ,business.industry ,Biomechanics ,Arthroplasty ,Preload ,kinematics ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Research Article ,biomaterials ,disc arthroplasty - Abstract
Introduction Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has been associated with the development of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), with clinical incidence of approximately 3% per year. Cervical total disc arthroplasty (TDA) has been proposed as an alternative to prevent ASD. Hypotheses TDA in optimal placement using an elastic‐core cervical disc (RHINE, K2M Inc., Leesburg, Virginia) will replicate natural kinematics and will improve with optimal vs anterior placement. Methods Seven C3‐T1 cervical cadaver spines were tested intact first, then after one‐level TDA at C5‐C6 anterior placement, after TDA at C5‐C6 optimal placement, after two‐level TDA at C5‐C6 and C6‐C7 optimal placement, and finally after two‐level TDA at C5‐C6 lateral placement and C6‐C7 optimal placement. The specimens were subjected to: Flexion‐Extension moments (+1.5 Nm) with compressive preloads of 0 N and 150 N, lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR) (+1.5 Nm) without preload. Results C5‐C6 TDA in optimal placement resulted in a non‐significant increase in flexion‐extension ROM compared to intact under 0 N and 150 N preload (P > 0.05). Both LB and AR ROM decreased with arthroplasty (P
- Published
- 2018