Search

The ability to inhibit incorrect behaviors is crucial for survival. In real contexts, cues that require stopping usually appear intermixed with indications to continue the ongoing action. However, in the classical Stop-signal task (SST), the unpredictable stimuli are always signals that require inhibition. To understand the neural mechanisms activated by low-probability nonstop cues, we recorded the electroencephalography from 23 young volunteers while they performed a modified SST where the unpredictable stimuli could be either Stop or confirmatory Go signals (CGo). To isolate the influence of motor output, the SST was performed during overt and covert execution. We found that, paradoxically, CGo stimuli activated motor inhibition processes, and evoked patterns of brain activity similar to those obtained after Stop signals (N2/P3 event-related potentials and midfrontal theta power increase), though in lesser magnitude. These patterns were also observed during the imagined performance. Finally, applying machine learning procedures, we found that the brain activity evoked after CGo versus Stop signals can be classified above chance during both, overt and imagined execution. Our results provide evidence that unpredictable signals cause motor inhibition even when they require to continue an ongoing action This work was supported by funding from the Galician Government (Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria; Axudas para a consolidación e Estruturación de unidades de investigación competitivas do Sistema universitario de Galicia; grant number Ref:: ED431C 2021/04.); and from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia––Scientific Employment Stimulus (CEECIND/02639/2017 to A.G.V.) SI

A famous-face naming task was used to establish the electrophysiological characterization of the tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) state, successful naming (K), and nonrecognition (DK). The differences in the direct event-related potentials (ERPs) and in the lateralized readiness potential between those categories were studied. The ERP correlates of recognition and access to semantic and lexical information were similar between K and TOT, but showed amplitude differences with respect to DK. A delayed onset of the response selection was obtained in TOT in comparison with K, suggesting an insufficient activation of phonological information from 360ms onwards. The continuous search for the name and the conflict monitoring in TOT led to differences in ERP amplitudes between TOT and the other categories from 750ms onwards as well as to a delayed onset of response preparation, indicating a continuous engagement of processing resources. © 2012 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Although there is substantial evidence that motor execution (M-Ex) and motor imagery (M-Im) share a common neural substrate, the role of the primary motor cortex (M1) during imagery is still a matter of debate. The present ERP study tries to clarify the functional similarity between the two processes in respect of (i) the engagement of the corresponding somatotopic M1 areas during execution and imagery of hand vs. foot movements; and (ii) the effect of conflicting information on response preparation. To this end, we recorded ERPs from 28 electrode sites in 19 participants while they performed a conflict task with congruent (target and flanker arrowheads pointing in the same direction) and incongruent (target pointing in the opposite direction to the flanker arrowheads) trials. We obtained the lateralized readiness potential (LRP), a component generated in M1, while subjects physically executed or mentally simulated the task. As expected by the somatotopic organization of M1, the LRP was of opposite polarity when foot, rather than hand, movements were prepared. The inversion of polarity also occurred during M-Im, a result that strongly argues in favour of the participation of M1 in motor imagery. In incongruent trials, longer LRP latencies, a premature preparation of the incorrect response (positive deflection in LRP waveform) and a fronto-central N2 component associated with response conflict appeared during both M-Ex and M-Im. Altogether, the results support the functional equivalence of the two processes and give support to the clinical use of M-Im for the improvement and recovery of motor functions.