Search

The all-electron full configuration interaction (FCI) vertical excitation energies for some low lying valence and Rydberg excited states of BeH are presented in this article. A basis set of valence atomic natural orbitals has been augmented with a series of Rydberg orbitals that have been generated as centered onto the Be atom. The resulting basis set can be described as 4s2p1d/2s1p (Be/H) + 4s4p3d. It allows to calculate Rydberg states up to n= {3,4,5} of the s, p, and d series of Rydberg states. The FCI vertical ionization potential for the same basis set and geometry amounts to 8.298 eV. Other properties such as FCI electric dipole and quadrupole moments and FCI transition dipole and quadrupole moments have also been calculated. The results provide a set of benchmark values for energies, wave functions, properties, and transition properties for the five electron BeH molecule. Most of the states have large multiconfigurational character in spite of their essentially single excited nature and a number of them present an important Rydberg-valence mixing that is achieved through the mixed nature of the particle MO of the single excitations.

The open shell (SC)(2)-CAS-SDCI method along with a basis set of atomic natural orbitals (ANO) has been applied for calculating the main ionization potentials of acetylene, as well as the manifold of excited states of the different symmetries up to 32 eV. In this method, the single and double excitations of a CAS space are generated and the corresponding CI matrix is corrected by means of the (SC)(2) procedure that cancels the size-extensivity error and adds some high order contributions. The mean absolute error for the outer-valence X (2)Pi(u)(1pi(u) (-1)), A (2)Sigma(g) (+)(3sigma(g) (-1)), and B (2)Sigma(u) (+)(2sigma(u) (-1)) states, and the inner-valence C (2)Sigma(g) (+)(2sigma(g) (-1)) state is 0.1 eV. The excited states of C(2)H(2) (+) corresponding to the Sigma(g) (+), Sigma(u) (+), Pi(g), Pi(u), Delta(g), and Delta(u) symmetries are reported and their composition is discussed. The results are thoroughly compared to the best available multireference CI calculations. Recent multichannel CI results by Wells and Lucchese [J Chem Phys 1999, 110, 6365] have been used also as a guide for the discussion of the results. Discrepancies in the description of many multiconfigurational states by means of the (SC)(2)-CAS-SDCI wave function as compared to previous large MR-CI calculations are significant and are, consequently, remarked on. A large mixing of the 3sigma(g) (-1) and 2sigma(g) (-1) processes is found in the A (2)Sigma(g) (+) and C (2)Sigma(g) (+) states, provided that the basis set is augmented with Rydberg functions., (Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 24: 609-617, 2003)

A new method is presented, which allows an important reduction of the size of some Configuration Interaction (CI) matrices. Starting from a Complete Active Space (CAS), the numerous configurations that have a small weight in the CAS wave function are eliminated. When excited configurations (e.g., singly and doubly excited) are added to the reference space, the resulting MR-SDCI space is reduced in the same proportion as compared with the full CAS-SDCI. A set of active orbitals is chosen, but some selection of the most relevant excitations is performed because not all the possible excitations act as SDCI generators. Thanks to a new addressing technique, the computational time is drastically reduced, because the new addressing of the selected active space is as efficient as the addressing of the CAS. The presentation of the method is followed by two test calculations on the N(2) and HCCH molecules. For the N(2) the FCI results are taken as a benchmark reference. The outer valence ionization potentials of HCCH are compared to the experimental values. Both examples allow to test the accuracy of the MR-SDCI compared to that of the corresponding CAS-SDCI, despite the noticeable reduction of the CI space. The algorithm is suitable for the dressing techniques that allow for the correction of the size-extensivity error. The corrected results are also shown and discussed., (Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 23: 1157-1165, 2002)