1. J-difference-edited MRS measures of γ-aminobutyric acid before and after acute caffeine administration
- Author
-
Hans Jörg Wittsack, Alfons Schnitzler, Marc Jonuscheit, Rotem S. Lanzman, Georg Oeltzschner, and Helge J. Zöllner
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Tissue water ,Chemistry ,Glutamate receptor ,Caffeine Dose ,Creatine ,Aminobutyric acid ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Glutamine ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Endocrinology ,nervous system ,Oral administration ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Caffeine ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate potential effects of acute caffeine intake on J-difference-edited MRS measures of the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). METHODS J-difference-edited Mescher-Garwood PRESS (MEGA-PRESS) and conventional PRESS data were acquired at 3T from voxels in the anterior cingulate and occipital area of the brain in 15 healthy subjects, before and after oral intake of a 200-mg caffeine dose. MEGA-PRESS data were analyzed with the MATLAB-based Gannet tool to estimate GABA+ macromolecule (GABA+) levels, while PRESS data were analyzed with LCModel to estimate levels of glutamate, glutamate+glutamine, N-acetylaspartate, and myo-inositol. All metabolites were quantified with respect to the internal reference compounds creatine and tissue water, and compared between the pre- and post-caffeine intake condition. RESULTS For both MRS voxels, mean GABA+ estimates did not differ before and after caffeine intake. Slightly lower estimates of myo-inositol were observed after caffeine intake in both voxels. N-acetylaspartate, glutamate, and glutamate+glutamine did not show significant differences between conditions. CONCLUSION Mean GABA+ estimates from J-difference-edited MRS in two different brain regions are not altered by acute oral administration of caffeine. These findings may increase subject recruitment efficiency for MRS studies.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF