Search

This study assessed the effect of the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole on the bioavailability of the extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine. Forty-four healthy volunteers received each of 4 treatments in a 4-period crossover design. The treatments consisted of osmotically controlled extended-release oxybutynin chloride tablets at 10 mg/d or extended-release tolterodine tartrate capsules at 4 mg/d, with and without preceding treatment with 20 mg omeprazole daily for 4 days. Blood samples collected predose and at scheduled time points for 36 hours postdose were analyzed for oxybutynin and its active metabolite, N-desethyloxybutynin, or tolterodine and its active 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite, as appropriate. The AUCinfinity ratios for oxybutynin and its metabolite with and without prior omeprazole fell within the 80% to 125% range (accepted as the criterion for bioequivalence), as did those for tolterodine and its active moiety. The peak concentration ratios for oxybutynin and metabolite also conformed to this range; those for tolterodine did not. Increasing gastric pH with omeprazole does not substantially alter the pharmacokinetic properties of extended-release oxybutynin but may alter those of extended-release tolterodine.

Between 1995 and 1999, urethral sphincter mechanism incompetence was diagnosed in 11 bitches. They had been treated with phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride at the recommended dose rate, but had shown no response or had become refractory to treatment. They were treated with phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride in a sustained-release formulation combined with diphenylpyraline hydrochloride. The urinary incontinence resolved fully in six of the bitches, two of which remained continent after the treatment was withdrawn; two showed a marked improvement on daily treatment, but the other three bitches failed to respond and underwent colposuspension.

Objective: Serious cardiovascular toxicity has been reported in people taking dietary supplements that contain ma huang (Ephedra) and guarana (caffeine). We assessed the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a dietary supplement that contains these herbal stimulants., Methods: Eight healthy adults received a single oral dose of a thermogenic dietary supplement labeled to contain 20 mg ephedrine alkaloids and 200 mg caffeine after an overnight fast. Serial plasma and urine samples were analyzed by use of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for ephedrine alkaloid and caffeine concentrations, and heart rate and blood pressure were monitored for 14 hours., Results: Plasma clearance and elimination half-lives for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and caffeine were comparable to published values reported for drug formulations. A prolonged half-life of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine was observed in 1 subject with the highest urine pH. Mean systolic blood pressure increased significantly to a maximum of 14 mm Hg above baseline at 90 minutes after ingestion (P <.001). There was a lag in the mean heart rate response that reached a maximum change of 15 beats/min above baseline at 6 hours after ingestion (P <.001). Diastolic blood pressure changes were insignificant. Two subjects who were taking oral contraceptives had longer caffeine half-lives (15.5 +/- 0.3 hours versus 5.6 +/- 1.7 hours) and lower values for oral clearance (0.34 +/- 0.01 mL/min. kg versus 0.99 +/- 0.41 mL/min. kg) than subjects who were not taking oral contraceptives., Conclusions: Botanical stimulants have disposition characteristics similar to their pharmaceutical counterparts, and they can produce significant cardiovascular responses after a single dose.

A high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the simultaneous determination of (+/-) fenfluramine (Fen) and phentermine (Phen) in addition to three other sympathomimetic amines-ephedrine (E), norephedrine (NE) and 2-phenylethylamine (2-PEA), using cyclohexylamine (CX) as an internal standard in plasma. The compounds were derivatized with 4-(4,5-diphenyl-1H-imidazole-2-yl)benzoyl chloride (DIB-Cl) to give the DIB-derivatives. The derivatives were then separated using an isocratic HPLC system with UV detection. The limits of detection for Fen, Phen, E, NE and 2-PEA in plasma ranged from 0.32 to 22.9 pmol on column at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3. The recoveries following alkaline extraction from plasma samples of known concentrations were found to be more than 94% for the studied compounds. This method might be useful for the screening of the studied sympathomimetic amines in human plasma samples in forensic as well as toxicological studies. Furthermore, the developed method was modified for the simultaneous determination of Fen and Phen in human and rat plasma using fluoxetine as an internal standard. The methods are reproducible and precise. Finally, the two drugs were administered intraperitoneally to rats in combination, and their plasma levels over the investigated time course were successfully determined., (Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Linezolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibiotic with mild reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) activity. The potential for interaction with over-the-counter (OTC) medications requires quantification. The authors present data evaluating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to coadministration of oral linezolid with sympathomimetics (pseudoephedrine and phenylpropanolamine) and a serotonin reuptake inhibitor (dextromethorphan). Following coadministration with linezolid, minimal but statistically significant increases were observed in pseudoephedrine and phenylpropanolamine plasma concentrations; a minimal but statistically significant decrease was observed in dextrorphan (the primary metabolite of dextromethorphan) plasma concentrations. Increased blood pressure (BP) was observed following the coadministration of linezolid with either pseudoephedrine or phenylpropanolamine; no significant effects were observed with dextromethorphan. None of these coadministered drugs had a significant effect on linezolid pharmacokinetics. Minimal numbers of adverse events were reported. Potentiation of sympathomimetic activity by linezolid was judged not to be clinically significant, but patients sensitive to the effects of increased BP due to predisposing factors should be treated cautiously. No restrictions are indicated for the coadministration of dextromethorphan and linezolid.

Studies were conducted in healthy male volunteers (n = 171; age range, 19-49 years; 22-27 subjects per study) to examine the following: pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of the antihistamine clemastine; the effect of coadministration of phenylpropanolamine and clemastine on the pharmacokinetics of the two drugs; and the bioavailability of clemastine tablets and combination tablets of clemastine and sustained-release phenyl-propanolamine under fasted and fed conditions after single-dose administration and at steady state. All studies used crossover designs, with randomized drug treatments separated by a 7-day washout period for the single-dose studies, and with administration every 6 or 12 hours for 7 days per treatment for the steady-state studies. After single oral doses of clemastine solution (1,2, and 4 mg), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were dose proportional. Clemastine showed a first-pass reduction in the extent of absorption, with oral bioavailability calculated as 39.2 +/- 12.4%. Extravascular distribution of drug was suggested by the high volume of distribution (799 +/- 315 L) and low Cmax (0.577 +/- 0.252 ng/mL/mg) observed at 4.77 +/- 2.26 hours after administration, and by the biphasic decline in plasma concentration. The terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of clemastine was 21.3 +/- 11.6 hours. Steady-state concentrations of clemastine were consistent with linear pharmacokinetic processes, and clearance was unaffected by age in the range studied, or by race. Clemastine solution and tablets were bioequivalent, and food had no significant effect on rate and extent of absorption of clemastine. The 1- and 2-mg clemastine tablets showed proportional bioavailability. Coadministration of clemastine with phenylpropanolamine did not significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of clemastine or the AUC and elimination t1/2 of phenylpropanolamine, but reduced the rate of absorption of phenylpropanolamine. Combination tablets containing 1 mg or 2 mg of immediate-release clemastine plus 75 mg of sustained-release phenylpropanolamine for twice daily administration were bioequivalent to the separate components and showed no significant interaction with food.

Phenylpropanolamine, a widely consumed over-the-counter drug, is known to elevate blood pressure, but the mechanism is unknown; it may be both a direct and indirect sympathomimetic. This study investigated the effects of 75-mg sustained-release phenylpropanolamine, 75-mg phenylpropanolamine plus 400-mg caffeine, and 150-mg phenylpropanolamine on blood pressure, plasma norepinephrine, and epinephrine levels in 16 normotensive subjects in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design. Mean peak phenylpropanolamine levels of 317 +/- 26, 152 +/- 17, and 157 +/- 17 ng/mL for 150-mg phenylpropanolamine, 75-mg phenylpropanolamine, and 75-mg phenylpropanolamine plus 400-mg caffeine, respectively, were reached at about 3.6 hours after dosing. The maximal increases in supine diastolic blood pressures after all three phenylpropanolamine-containing drugs were almost three times that after placebo (P less than .05), but peak blood pressures occurred at about 2.3 hours earlier than peak phenylpropanolamine levels. Blood pressure increases correlated with phenylpropanolamine plasma levels (r = .49 for systolic blood pressure and r = .34 for diastolic blood pressure; P less than .0001 for both). Norepinephrine levels increased after the administration of 150-mg phenylpropanolamine and 75-mg phenylpropanolamine plus 400-mg caffeine; norepinephrine increases correlated with phenylpropanolamine levels (r = .34, P less than .0001). The expected increment in norepinephrine induced by standing was significantly decreased by phenylpropanolamine in a dose-dependent mode. The study supports the idea that phenylpropanolamine as both a direct (at alpha -1 and alpha-2 receptors) and an indirect sympathomimetic agent.

Racemic phenylpropanolamine was resolved on a high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) chiral stationary phase (CSP) as the 3,5-dinitrophenyl ureide derivative. The CSP was prepared by a simple in situ procedure in which (R)-(1-naphthyl)ethyl isocyanate was bound to aminopropyl silanized silica through a urea linkage. The enantiomeric ureides were prepared by a room-temperature, 60-second procedure, accomplishing simultaneous extraction and derivatization and utilizing achiral 3,5-dinitrophenyl isocyanate as reagent. Baseline resolution was readily achieved under normal phase conditions, with a separation factor (alpha) of 1.16 and a resolution factor (RS) of 2.2. Elution was complete within 10 min. A limit of detection, by UV at 235 nm, of 250 pg per isomer was established. Feasibility of the procedure for plasma determinations was demonstrated by assay of samples from a canine subject.

The bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride (PPA HCl) from a Dexatrim controlled-release (CR) caplet and solution was studied. Each subject (n = 12) received either a 75 mg PPA HCl CR caplet once daily or a 25 mg PPA HCl solution given three times a day. All subjects received the medication for 4 consecutive days. On Day 1, the mean +/- SEM, AUC, tmax, and Cmax values were 1651 +/- 127 ng x h ml-1, 4.5 +/- 0.26 h and 143 +/- 13.5 ng ml-1, respectively, for the CR caplet and 1716 +/- 90.3 ng x h ml-1, 1.25 +/- 0.08 h and 126 +/- 5.8 ng ml-1 for the solution, respectively. At steady state (Day 4), the mean +/- SEM, AUC, tmax, and Cmax values were 1832 +/- 101 ng x h ml-1, 4.17 +/- 0.17 h and 151 +/- 6.5 ng ml-1, respectively, for the CR caplet and 2014 +/- 116 ng x h ml-1, 1.33 +/- 0.09 h and 143 +/- 8.7 ng ml-1, respectively, for the solution. The data from Day 1 were fitted to an oral one compartment model with a first order absorption rate constant, kA, first order elimination rate constant, k and lag time. The mean +/- SEM, kA, elimination half-life and lag time for PPA HCl from the CR caplet were 0.488 +/- 0.182 ng h ml-1, 5.84 +/- 1.66 h and 0.394 +/- 0.224 h, respectively. The mean +/- SEM, kA, elimination half-life and lag time for PPA HCl from the solution were 2.87 +/- 1.51 ng x h ml-1, 3.73 +/- 1.21 h, and 0.325 +/- 0.101 h, respectively. The smaller apparent kA and longer elimination half-life for PPA HCl from the CR caplet is due to the slow release of PPA HCl, thereby slowing its absorption producing sustained plasma drug concentrations. Blood pressures (supine and sitting) and heart rates measured at the time of blood sampling after the administration of the PPA HCl dosage forms demonstrated no clinically significant relationship between cardiovascular response and PPA HCl plasma concentration. These data demonstrate the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of PPA HCl from a CR caplet and an immediate release solution.

The pharmacokinetics of phenylpropanolamine (PPA) were studied in five healthy male volunteers after single oral doses of 25, 50 and 100 mg of the drug as well as at steady state after seven, 4-hourly doses of PPA. The peak serum concentrations and AUC infinity values increased linearly with an increase in dose, whereas the time to reach peak serum concentrations did not vary significantly between doses. The half-life remained relatively constant with an increase in dose (t1/2 = 3.8 to 4.3 hours), as did renal clearance (ClR = 0.41 to 0.44 l/kg/h). The percentage of unchanged PPA excreted in the urine over a 14 hour period was 64%, 63% and 73% for the 25, 50 and 100 mg doses, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of PPA were found to be linear in the dosage range 25 to 100 mg. Steady state serum concentrations were significantly higher than single dose concentrations, with the mean peak serum concentration increasing from 113 ng/ml after a single dose to 183 ng/ml at steady state. The time at which these were attained decreased from 1.47 hours after a single dose to 0.73 hours at steady state. Both clearance and volume of distribution were significantly different after a single dose compared to steady state (P less than 0.05), whereas no significant differences were found between the other parameters.

An adaption of a published high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay for phenylpropanolamine (PPA) in plasma was used to examine PPA pharmacokinetics in dogs. Plasma was extracted into ethyl acetate after the addition of 3.5 per cent sodium carbonate, and was then back-extracted into aqueous acetic acid. The acetic acid was injected onto a cyano column using a mobile phase of acetonitrile, dilute hydrochloric acid, and sodium heptane sulfonate. Detection was by UV absorbance at 210 nm. The relative standard deviation of replicate assays averaged 5.2 per cent over a concentration range of 50-1750 ng ml-1 plasma. PPA extraction recovery exceeded 90 per cent. The limit of detection was 30 ng ml-1 using 0.5 ml plasma and injecting 10 microliter. PPA disposition was characterized in three dogs administered PPA i.v. and orally in immediate-release and controlled-release formulations. The terminal elimination half-life averaged 3.5 +/- 0.5 h after the i.v. dose. Oral absorption from the immediate-release capsule was rapid and bioavailability was 98.2 +/- 6.9 per initial rapid cent. PPA absorption from the controlled-release dosage form was biphasic; an rapid phase was followed by a second, slower absorption phase which continued over 16 h. Plasma PPA concentrations then declined with a half-life roughly parallel to the i.v. and oral immediate-release half-lives. Oral bioavailability from the controlled release tablet was 93.7 +/- 5.9 per cent.