Search

Background Angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibody (AT1RAb) has been reported to cause antibody mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant recipients possibly by contraction of renal arteries. We here report 2 kidney transplant recipients with elevated AT1RAbs and negative HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) and anti-major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related gene A (MICA) Abs who received therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) treatment followed by IVIG. CASE 1: Thirty-eight-year-old patient received second kidney transplant for end stage renal disease (ESRD) with chronic rejection. Three years post-transplant, she developed AMR with AT1RAb level >40 U/mL. She received 5 TPE and AT1RAb decreased by 20%, and biopsy showed improvement of AMR. She received another 3 TPE and AT1RAb decreased by 60%. Her creatinine (Cr) was stabilized at around 1.4 mg/dL. CASE 2: Twenty-four-year-old patient received kidney transplant for ESRD with unclear etiology. Two weeks post-transplant, her Cr rose with AT1RAb level at 18 U/mL and biopsy showed possible AMR. She received 6 TPE treatments and AT1RAb decreased by 55% and biopsy showed improvement of AMR. She received weekly TPE for subsequently rising AT1RAb but TPE was discontinued because of unsuccessful decrease of AT1RAb. Her Cr was stabilized at around 1.7 mL/dL. Conclusion We reported 2 patients who received TPE treatments to decrease AT1RAbs. A course of TPE treatment successfully decreased AT1RAb. Histological improvement was observed quickly and Cr was also stabilized following the TPE treatment. Further study is necessary to determine the optimal use of TPE in renal transplant recipients with AT1RAbs.

BACKGROUND Ets is a large family of transcriptional regulators with functions in most biological processes. While the Ets family gene, prostate-derived epithelial factor (PDEF), is expressed in epithelial tissues, PDEF protein expression has been found to be reduced or lost during cancer progression. The goal of this study was to examine the mechanism for and biologic impact of altered PDEF expression in prostate cancer. METHODS PDEF protein expression of prostate specimens was examined by immunohistochemistry. RNA and protein expression in cell lines were measured by q-PCR and Western blot, respectively. Cellular growth was determined by quantifying viable and apoptotic cells over time. Cell cycle was measured by flow cytometry. Migration and invasion were determined by transwell assays. PDEF promoter occupancy was determined by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). RESULTS While normal prostate epithelium expresses PDEF mRNA and protein, tumors show no or decreased PDEF protein expression. Re-expression of PDEF in prostate cancer cells inhibits cell growth. PDEF expression is inversely correlated with survivin, urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and slug expression and ChIP studies identify survivin and uPA as direct transcriptional targets of PDEF. This study also shows that PDEF expression is regulated via a functional microRNA-204 (miR-204) binding site within the 3′UTR. Furthermore, we demonstrate the biologic significance of miR-204 expression and that miR-204 is over-expressed in human prostate cancer specimens. CONCLUSIONS Collectively, the reported studies demonstrate that PDEF is a negative regulator of tumor progression and that the miR-204-PDEF regulatory axis contributes to PDEF protein loss and resultant cancer progression. Prostate 71:1723–1735, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

ETS is a family of transcriptional regulators with functions in most biological processes. Dysregulated ETS factor function leads to altered expression of multiple genes that play critical roles in many of the processes required for cancer progression. While the Ets family gene, prostate-derived ETS factor (PDEF), is expressed in epithelial tissues including prostate, breast, and colon, PDEF protein expression has been found to be reduced or lost during prostate and breast cancer progression. The goal of this study was to examine the expression and biologic impact of altered PDEF expression in colon cancer. PDEF mRNA and protein are not detectable in several colon-cancer-derived cell lines. Re-expression of PDEF in colon cancer cells inhibits growth and migration. Growth affects are due to altered cellular proliferation, indicated by increased altered cell population in G(1) and S phases of the cell cycle, as well as increased apoptosis. Relevant to its modulation of growth and migration phenotypes, PDEF expression resulted in altered expression of genes with established roles in cell cycle, motility, and invasion. Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation studies show that p21 and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) are direct PDEF transcriptional targets. While non-tumor colon epithelium expresses PDEF mRNA and protein, the majority of tumors showed decreased mRNA and/or protein expression. In human tumor tissue samples, PDEF expression was inversely correlated with the expression levels of uPA. Collectively, the data support the model that PDEF is a negative regulator of tumor progression by modulating the expression of growth and migration promoting genes.