Search

BACKGROUND AND AIM Several experts of direct peroral videocholangioscopy (D-PVCS) using a conventional ultraslim endoscope have reported its usefulness for the diagnosis and therapy of biliary tract diseases. We have additionally developed a dedicated double-bending D-PVCS technique for freehand scope insertion. In this study, we developed an ex vivo training model for the freehand double-bending D-PVCS technique and compared it with the technique using a conventional ultraslim endoscope. METHODS The ex vivo model was made for training using a U-shape insertion pattern. A third prototype endoscope and an ultraslim upper gastrointestinal endoscope were used. Two experts and nine non-experts performed D-PVCS using the freehand technique. RESULTS The two experts could not advance the tip of the endoscope to the hilar portion using the freehand technique, but they could achieve technical successful insertion to the hilar portion with the third prototype cholangioscope using the freehand technique alone. The non-experts could not advance the tip of the endoscope to the bile duct using the freehand technique. On the other hand, two (22.2%) non-experts could advance the tip of the third prototype cholangioscope using the freehand technique before the training conducted by the experts. After the training, all the non-experts could advance the tip of the third prototype cholangioscope to the hilar portion. CONCLUSIONS The novel ex vivo model using a third prototype cholangioscope was useful for training in the use of the freehand D-PVCS technique.

Background and Aim Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) combined with large balloon dilation (ESLBD) can be useful for extracting large and multiple bile duct stones. Although there are many studies on the feasibility and short-term outcome, there are few reports about mid- to long-term outcome after ESLBD. The aim of our study is to prospectively evaluate the mid-term outcome of ESLBD. Methods One hundred eighty-three patients who underwent ESLBD between November 2006 and May 2012 were included. The patients were followed up periodically after the procedure until April 2013. Papillary dilation was performed at the time of initial ES or prior ES. Early and late adverse events and stone recurrence were evaluated in this study. Results The patients' mean age was 76.6 ± 10.7 years. Surgically altered anatomy was present: Billroth I gastrectomy (2), Billroth II gastrectomy (13), and gastrectomy with Roux-en Y reconstruction (18). Seventy-eight (42.6%) patients had periampullary diverticulum. Prior ES had been performed in 40 (21.9%) patients. The mean follow-up period was 43.5 ± 19.7 months (range 11–78). Eight (4.4%) patients had stone recurrence. There was rare stone recurrence after initial ESLBD treatment and native gastrointestinal anatomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that prior ES and previous history of stone recurrence were predictive of stone recurrence (P

Background and Aims Pancreatic duct guidewire placement (P-GW) techniques include both the injection cannulation technique with a contrast medium and wire-guided cannulation without contrast injection for selective biliary cannulation; the latter is the so-called “double-guidewire technique” (D-GW). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between P-GW and D-GW for biliary cannulation. Methods The procedures for biliary cannulation with a naive papilla were performed in a total of 363 cases. We divided the patients chronologically, according to the time period during which the procedures were performed, into two groups: group A, P-GW performed from March 2008 to June 2009; and group B, D-GW performed from July 2009 to December 2010. The success rates and complication rates were evaluated in each group. Results Biliary cannulation was successful in 31 (81.6%) patients in the P-GW group and 34 patients (82.9%) in the D-GW group. The onsets of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) occurred in the P-GW and D-GW groups were four (10.5%) and three (7.3%) patients, respectively, and all were mild cases (P = 0.616). The frequency of hyperamylasemia and the serum amylase level tended to be lower in the D-GW group than in the P-GW group (P = 0.213). There was a statistically significant difference on the onsets of PEP in the GW and non-GW groups (P = 0.04, 8.9% and 1.1%, respectively). Conclusions Both the D-GW and P-GW techniques were equally effective for difficult biliary cannulation. Furthermore, the complication rates, including PEP, were similar in both techniques. A prospective randomized trial is warranted.

Biliary self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) is the preferred and first-line therapy for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction. To date, several reports have revealed the relatively high incidence of acute complications such as pancreatitis and cholecystitis due to mechanical stent compression. In the present case, we encountered fatal pancreatitis following fully covered metal stent placement. An 85-year-old man had middle bile duct strictures due to cholangiocarcinoma. A 10-mm diameter fully covered SEMS was placed across the papilla for biliary decompression. Laboratory data and physical evidence the following day revealed acute pancreatitis. Therefore, antibiotics and protein degeneration enzyme inhibitors were given. However, his condition did not improve. Two days after the procedure, we removed the stent and returned him to his original hospital. Serum amylase level decreased below 400 mg/dL 6 h after the procedure. However, the acute pancreatitis worsened. Although we treated the patient in the intensive care unit, he died 32 days after the second admission.

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been carried out as an alternative to the percutaneous or surgical approach when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography fails. However, there is no standard technique or device for EUS-BD. In this review, we focus on how we choose the stents and described our tips on this EUS-BD technique. The plastic stent (PS) and the self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) are used for EUS-BD. The latter is further divided into the fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS), partially covered SEMS (PCSEMS), and uncovered SEMS (UCSEMS) types. Although PS is not expensive, the duration of stent patency is short. SEMS is expensive but the duration of stent patency is long. With UCSEMS, basically there is no stent malpositioning; however, if the gap between the bile duct and the GI tract becomes displaced, bile leakage from the mesh of the stent is likely to occur. Though there is no bile leakage with FCSEMS, the side branch of the bile duct may become occluded, and migration and dislocation sometimes occur. PCSEMS is basically similar to FCSEMS. When EUS-BD was first developed, drainage by PS was common, although reports on drainage by SEMS have increased recently.

There are few reports on the histological diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in a large-series of pancreatic masses. In the present study therefore we retrospectively evaluated the histological diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA in pancreatic masses without on-site cytopathologist. In 355 patients with pancreatic solid masses, EUS-FNA was carried out. EUS-FNA histology showed accuracy, 90.7%; sensitivity, 89.5%; specificity, 95.6%; positive predict value, 98.8%; negative predict value, 68.8% by intention-to-treat analysis. Except for 10 with inadequate materials, EUS-FNA histology showed accuracy, 93.3%; sensitivity, 91.8%; specificity, 100%; positive predict value, 100%; negative predict value, 77.6%. The mean number of puncture was 2.88 (range 1 to 8). There was two (0.6%) procedure-related bleeding. In conclusion, diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA by histological materials was similar to previous literature on the EUS-FNA without on-site cytopathologist.

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been developed as an alternative drainage method in patients with obstructive jaundice. EUS-BD is divided into EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS), EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) and EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD). The aim of this review is to focus on the current status and limitations of EUS-BD. A systematic review was performed to evaluate EUS-BD. MEDLINE, EMBASE and manual searches were performed to identify the pertinent English language full articles. The high success rate without fatal adverse events for EUS-CDS (93%; 28/30) and EUS-HGS (97%; 28/29) suggest the feasibility and safety of the procedures in high-volume endoscopic centers adopting various procedural techniques. Although the number of reported cases was very small, the success rate of EUS-GBD was high (100%; 14/14), without serious adverse events. Although all procedures require further assessment in a larger cohort of patients, including comparative studies between EUS-CDS or EUS-HGS versus PTBD, and EUS-GBD versus PTGBD, EUS-BD may be a promising procedure for the treatment of obstructive jaundice. However, dedicated devices for EUS-guided drainage are needed for reliable procedures.

A 51-year-old man was hospitalized because of close examination for liver dysfunction. drip infusion cholangiography-computed tomography (DIC-CT) revealed a stricture located at the middle bile duct but normal biliary scintigraphy. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) showed obstruction of bile duct. Although we tried to pass the stricture using several kinds of guidewire under direct vision of peroral cholangioscopy, recanalization could not be achieved. Then percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) was conducted. Cholangioscopy using narrow band imaging showed no tumor vessel or irregular mucosa. The biopsy specimens obtained from both distal and proximal sides of stricture showed no malignancy. Eventually, a rendezvous technique was tried using guidewire under percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTCS) direct vision. Fortunately, since a guidewire could advance into a tiny hole at the center of a scar and an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tube could be placed across the biliary stricture. One week after placement of ENBD tube, a 10 Fr plastic stent was inserted and the PTBD tube was removed without procedure-related complication. Eight months later, the stent was removed and the chief complaint disappeared without liver dysfunction.

We describe a case of successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using an ultrathin endoscope for inaccessible peridiverticular papilla by a single balloon enteroscopy (SBE) in a patient with Roux-en Y (R-Y). A 73-year-old man who had total gastrectomy with R-Y for gastric cancer was admitted for acute cholangitis. Although the SBE could be advanced to the end of the afferent loop, we could not identify a major papilla, although a duodenal diverticula could be observed. The enteroscope was replaced with an ultrathin endoscope. The ultrathin endoscope allowed the papilla to be detected distal to the side of the diverticula. After pre-cutting, the ultraslim endoscope was replaced with a conventional forward-viewing endoscope. Eventually, the stones were completely removed using a balloon catheter and basket without procedure-related complication.

Pancreatic duct stones are a common complication of chronic pancreatitis. We describe successful endoscopic removal of a large pancreatic duct stone using large-balloon dilation in combination with pancreatic sphincterotomy. A 63-year-old woman was admitted for endoscopic treatment of acute on chronic pancreatitis with diabetes and epigastric pain with liver dysfunction due to a large impacted stone within the distal main pancreatic duct. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy was carried out using a wire-guided pull-type sphincterotome. Although we could carry out a relatively large incision, the stone could not be extracted. We therefore carried out papillary dilation using a large balloon (diameter 12 to 15 mm) to make room alongside the stone. A 10 × 20-mm white pancreatic duct stone was extracted during the process of pulling a dilating balloon into the working channel of the endoscope. Eventually, the second stone was removed without any procedure-related complication.