Search

The Anopheles gambiae complex of mosquitoes includes malaria vectors at different stages of speciation, whose study enables a better understanding of how adaptation to divergent environmental conditions leads to evolution of reproductive isolation. We investigated the population genetic structure of closely related sympatric taxa that have recently been proposed as separate species (An. coluzzii and An. gambiae), sampled from diverse habitats along the Gambia river in West Africa. We characterized putatively neutral microsatellite loci as well as chromosomal inversion polymorphisms known to be associated with ecological adaptation. The results revealed strong ecologically associated population subdivisions within both species. Microsatellite loci on chromosome-3L revealed clear differentiation between coastal and inland populations, which in An. coluzzii is reinforced by a unusual inversion polymorphism pattern, supporting the hypothesis of genetic divergence driven by adaptation to the coastal habitat. A strong reduction of gene flow was observed between An. gambiae populations west and east of an extensively rice-cultivated region apparently colonized exclusively by An. coluzzii. Notably, this 'intraspecific' differentiation is higher than that observed between the two species and involves also the centromeric region of chromosome-X which has previously been considered a marker of speciation within this complex, possibly suggesting that the two populations may be at an advanced stage of differentiation triggered by human-made habitat fragmentation. These results confirm ongoing ecological speciation within these most important Afro-tropical malaria vectors and raise new questions on the possible effect of this process in malaria transmission.

Objective To explore ways of controlling Chrysomya putoria, the African latrine fly, in pit latrines. As pit latrines are a major source of these flies, eliminating these important breeding sites is likely to reduce village fly populations, and may reduce the spread of diarrhoeal pathogens. Methods We treated 24 latrines in a Gambian village: six each with (i) pyriproxyfen, an insect juvenile hormone mimic formulated as Sumilarv® 0.5G, a 0.5% pyriproxyfen granule, (ii) expanded polystyrene beads (EPB), (iii) local soap or (iv) no treatment as controls. Flies were collected using exit traps placed over the drop holes, weekly for five weeks. In a separate study, we tested whether latrines also function as efficient flytraps using the faecal odours as attractants. We constructed six pit latrines each with a built-in flytrap and tested their catching efficiency compared to six fish-baited box traps positioned 10 m from the latrine. Focus group discussions conducted afterwards assessed the acceptability of the flytrap latrines. Results Numbers of emerging C. putoria were reduced by 96.0% (95% CIs: 94.5–97.2%) 4–5 weeks after treatment with pyriproxyfen; by 64.2% (95% CIs: 51.8–73.5%) after treatment with local soap; by 41.3% (95% CIs = 24.0–54.7%) after treatment with EPB 3–5 weeks after treatment. Flytraps placed on latrines collected C. putoria and were deemed acceptable to local communities. Conclusions Sumilarv 0.5G shows promise as a chemical control agent, whilst odour-baited latrine traps may prove a useful method of non-chemical fly control. Both methods warrant further development to reduce fly production from pit latrines. A combination of interventions may prove effective for the control of latrine flies and the diseases they transmit. Objectif Explorer les moyens de lutter contre Chrysomya putoria, la mouche africaine des latrines, dans les latrines a fosse. Comme les latrines sont une source importante de production pour ces mouches, l’elimination de ces sites de reproduction importants est susceptible de reduire les populations de mouches du village et peut reduire la propagation des agents pathogenes diarrheiques. Methodes Nous avons traite 24 latrines dans un village gambien: six avec soit (1) du pyriproxyfene, une formulation imitant une hormone juvenile des insectes appelee Sumilarv® 0.5G, a granules de 0,5% de pyriproxyfene, (2) des billes de polystyrene gonflees (EPB), (3) du savon local ou (4) aucun traitement i.e. temoins. Les mouches ont ete recueillies a l'aide de pieges de sortie places au dessus des orifices des fosses, chaque semaine pendant cinq semaines. Dans une autre etude, nous avons teste si les latrines pouvaient servir egalement comme pieges a mouches efficaces en utilisant les odeurs fecales comme attractifs. Nous avons construit six latrines a fosse chacune avec un piege a mouche integre et avons teste leur efficacite de capture par rapport a six pieges appâtes sous forme de boites de poisson placees a 10 m de la latrine. Des discussions de groupe focalisees ont ete menees par la suite pour evaluer l'acceptabilite des latrines attrape-mouche. Resultats Le nombre de C. putoria emergents a ete reduit de 96,0% (IC95%: 94,5 a 97,2%) 4 a 5 semaines apres le traitement avec le pyriproxyfene, de 64,2% (IC95%: 51,8 a 73,5%) apres traitement avec du savon local, de 41,3% (IC95%: 24,0 a 54,7%) 3 a 5 semaines apres traitement avec des EPB. Les pieges a mouches places sur latrines ont collecte C. putoria et etaient juges acceptables par les collectivites locales. Conclusions Sumilarv 0,5 G est prometteur comme agent de lutte chimique, tandis que les pieges appâtes aux odeurs de latrines peuvent s'averer une methode utile non chimique pour lutter contre les mouches. Les deux methodes justifient un developpement supplementaire afin de pouvoir reduire la production de mouches a partir des latrines a fosse. Une combinaison des interventions peut s'averer efficace pour le controle des mouches des latrines et des maladies qu'elles transmettent. Objetivo Explorar las formas de controlar Chrysomya putoria, la mosca Africana de letrinas, en letrinas de hoyo seco. Puesto que las letrinas de hoyo seco son una fuente importante de estas moscas, eliminar estos lugares de reproduccion puede reducir las poblaciones de la mosca y por lo tanto reducir la diseminacion de patogenos diarreicos. Metodos Hemos tratado 24 letrinas en un poblado de Gambia: cada grupo de seis se trato con una de las siguientes (1) piriproxifen, que mimetiza una hormona juvenil del insecto formulada como Sumilarv® 0.5G, y piriproxifen granulado al 0.5%, (2) pastillas de poliestireno expandido (PPE), (3) jabon local (4) sin tratamiento como controles. Las moscas se recolectaron utilizando trampas de salida localizadas sobre los orificios de entrada, semanalmente, durante cinco semanas. En un estudio separado evaluamos si las letrinas tambien funcionaban como trampas eficientes utilizando los olores fecales como atrayentes. Construimos seis letrinas de fosa, cada una con una trampa para moscas incluida, y evaluamos su eficiencia para atrapar las moscas en comparacion con seis cajas-trampa con pescado como cebo, localizadas a 10 m de la letrina. Se llevaron a cabo grupos de discusion focalizada despues para evaluar la aceptacion de las letrinas con trampas para moscas. Resultados El numero de C. putoria emergentes se redujo en un 96.0% (IC95%: 94.5–97.2%) 4–5 semanas despues del tratamiento con piriproxifen; en un 64.2% (IC 95%: 51.8–73.5%) despues del tratamiento con jabon local; en un 41.3% (IC 95% = 24.0–54.7%) tras el tratamiento con PPE, 3–5 semanas despues del tratamiento. Las trampas de moscas localizadas en las letrinas recolectaron C. putoria y fueron consideradas como aceptables por las comunidades locales. Conclusiones El Sumilarv 0.5G parece ser prometedor como agente de control quimico, mientras que las letrinas con trampas de olor podrian ser utiles como metodo no quimico para el control de las moscas. Ambos metodos garantizan un mayor desarrollo para reducir la produccion de moscas de las letrinas de fosas. Una combinacion de intervenciones podria ser efectiva para el control de las moscas de letrinas y la enfermedad que transmiten.

ovement of mosquitoes belonging to the Anopheles gambiae complex (mixed wild populations of An.arabiensis, An.gambiae and An.melas) between three neighbouring rural villages in The Gambia was investigated by mark-release-recapture. A total of 12,872 mosquitoes were collected in bednets, marked with a magenta fluorescent powder and released over a 15-day period in one of the villages. A further 15,507 mosquitoes were collected in exit traps, marked with a yellow powder and released over the same period. Mosquitoes were captured daily in all three villages using pyrethrum spray catches, as well as bednet and exit trap catches. The catching period extended for 6 days after the last day of release. Of the mosquitoes released, 372 (1.3%) were recaptured 2–21 days later. Of these recaptures, 272 were caught in the release village, and 98 were caught in other villages situated 1–1.4 km away. The ‘movement index’ between villages was calculated as 17.2% (12.2–22.4% confidence limits) for mosquitoes released after feeding and 20.1% (14.7–25.3%) for those released unfed. These results suggest that movement of mosquitoes between neighbouring villages in The Gambia seriously affects the entomological evaluation of pyrethroid-impregnated bednet programmes in areas where treated and untreated villages are interspersed.