Search

Peri-implantitis is characterized by nonreversible and progressive loss of supporting bone and is associated with bleeding and/or suppuration on probing. Peri-implant disease is considered as the main etiologic factor related to implant failure. Peri-implant disease has a pathogenesis similar to that of periodontal disease, both being triggered by an inflammatory response to the biofilm accumulation. Although the prevalence of peri-implantitis has been evaluated by several clinical studies with different follow-ups, there are currently little data on the impact of implant location and the prevalence of peri-implantitis. The aim of this review, therefore, was to summarize the evidence concerning the prevalence of peri-implantitis in relation to implant location and associated risk predictors. Even though most studies evaluating the prevalence of peri-implantitis in relation to implant location are cross-sectional or retrospective, they suggest that the occurrence of peri-implantitis is most prevalent in the anterior regions of the maxilla and mandible. Moreover, it seems that there is a higher prevalence of peri-implantitis in the maxilla than in the mandible.

H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions; DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Mathematical and Statistical Sciences (CoE-MaSS), South Africa and National Research Foundation of South Africa.

Background Although widely used, the potential for immunological sensitization of allogeneic bone grafts is still controversial in the literature. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the immune response of allogeneic bone graft procedures in humans. Methods An electronic search without language or date restrictions occurred in four databases for articles published until July 2019. Eligibility criteria included prospective cohort studies, controlled clinical trials, and randomized clinical trials that evaluated the potential of allogeneic bone grafts in sensitized immune system in humans through immunological or biological analysis. The protocol number of this SR registered in PROSPERO is CDR42019135491. Results The search and selection process yielded eight prospective cohort studies published between 1984 and 2019. The percentage of patients' sensitization analyzed by human leukocyte antigens ranged from 21% to 67%, with a cumulative mean of 48 ± 17.3%. Bone soluble protein analysis demonstrates the sensitization of 55% of patients after allograft bone grafts. Also, a high level of circulating cell-free DNA took place in the immediate postoperative period. Conclusion Although studies report a low incidence of local complications, an average of 48% of the patients remain with the immune system sensitized after receiving allogeneic bone grafts. Future studies should better address the local and systemic consequences of such sensitization.

Peri-implantitis is characterized by nonreversible and progressive loss of supporting bone and is associated with bleeding and/or suppuration on probing. Peri-implant disease is considered as the main etiologic factor related to implant failure. Peri-implant disease has a pathogenesis similar to that of periodontal disease, both being triggered by an inflammatory response to the biofilm accumulation. Although the prevalence of peri-implantitis has been evaluated by several clinical studies with different follow-ups, there are currently little data on the impact of implant location and the prevalence of peri-implantitis. The aim of this review, therefore, was to summarize the evidence concerning the prevalence of peri-implantitis in relation to implant location and associated risk predictors. Even though most studies evaluating the prevalence of peri-implantitis in relation to implant location are cross-sectional or retrospective, they suggest that the occurrence of peri-implantitis is most prevalent in the anterior regions of the maxilla and mandible. Moreover, it seems that there is a higher prevalence of peri-implantitis in the maxilla than in the mandible.

Invasive multiple cervical root resorptions after vital tooth bleaching is a rare condition. The aim of this article is to present a case of multiple external cervical root resorptions (ECRR) after a misguided home whitening treatment. A 34 year old male patient presented with slight sensitivity and mobility in several teeth. Despite the manufacturer's recommendations, the patient used a 22% carbamide peroxide-based tooth bleaching gel at home for 4 days consecutively, at night, on the upper and lower arches. Clinical examination revealed gingival swelling, probing depths ranging 5-7 mm on the buccal and proximal surfaces, and grade 2 mobility of the teeth affected by ECRR. Radiographs revealed presence of ECRR in several teeth during initial examination, and development of multiple new lesions 6 months later. The teeth were subsequently extracted. Histological analysis showed multiple dentine lacunae and areas of dentine reparation. The careful use of these products can prevent sequelae such as those reported in this clinical case. As the vital bleaching has a variable success rate, patients should be informed through a consent form of the benefits and risks of tooth bleaching treatment.

Opsonophagocytic killing assays (OPKA) are routinely used for the quantification of bactericidal antibodies in blood serum samples. Quantification of the OPKA readout, the titer, provides the basis for the statistical analysis of vaccine clinical trials having functional immune response endpoints. Traditional OPKA titers are defined as the maximum serum dilution yielding a predefined bacterial killing threshold value, and they are estimated by fitting a dose-response model to the dilution-killing curve. This paper illustrates a novel definition of titer, the threshold-free titer, which preserves biological interpretability while not depending on any killing threshold or on a postulated shape of the dose-response curve. These titers are shown to be more precise than the traditional threshold-based titers when using simulated and experimental group B streptococcus OPKA experimental data. Also, titer linearity is shown to be not measurable when using threshold-based titers, whereas it becomes measurable using threshold-free titers. The biological interpretability and operational characteristics demonstrated here indicate that threshold-free titers are an appropriate tool for the routine analysis of OPKA data.