Search

Background Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been identified to be involved in onset and progression of multiple malignant tumors. The present study aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic values of circRNAs in breast cancer. Methods The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang online databases were searched for the relevant studies before December 31, 2020. Statistical analysis of the diagnostic tests was performed based on STATA 16.0, Meta‐DiSc 1.4, and RevMan 5.3 software. The threshold effect and publication bias were measured by the Spearman correlation and Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test, respectively. Results Twenty‐one studies from 13 articles were included in this meta‐analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 and 0.71, respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and overall diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 2.6, 0.33, and 8, respectively. Furthermore, the area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.80. In addition, down‐regulated circRNAs achieved a diagnostic performance higher than up‐regulated circRNAs, with area under curve (AUC) values of 0.81 and 0.74, respectively. Studies based on tissue samples presented better diagnostic accuracy than those based on plasma samples, with AUC values of 0.80 and 0.67. In addition, two circRNAs, including circ_0001073 and circTADA2A‐E5/E6, showed higher diagnostic values, with AUC value of 0.990 and 0.937, respectively. According to the results of meta‐regression, the case size (p, Thirteen studies comprised of 21 circRNAs were included in this meta‐analysis. Down‐regulated circRNAs achieved a diagnostic performance higher than up‐regulated circRNAs. Tissue‐based circRNA analysis presented better diagnostic accuracy than plasma‐based analysis.