Search

Objectives/hypothesis Describe augmentative communication tools and strategies used by pediatric patients referred to inpatient speech-language pathologists prior to tracheostomy placement. Study design Retrospective review. Methods A review of patients who underwent initial tracheostomy placement from 2013-2016 was conducted at a tertiary pediatric center. Eligible patients were those who were referred to a specialized speech-language pathologist prior to the date of the tracheostomy placement to support communication abilities. Patients were identified by surgical procedural and billing codes. Data collected included patient demographics, speech and language disorders, and interventions performed. Chart review and cross analysis of billing data for types of assessment and intervention procedures were conducted by two speech-language pathologists for consensus agreement. Results Forty-six patients (aged 1 month-27 years, mean = 12.9 years) were included in the study. Average time between the bedside communication assessment and tracheostomy procedure date was 17 days. Baseline speech-language disorders were identified in 11 patients (24%). Thirty-eight (83%) patients were nonspeaking at the time of consultation. Thirty-two (70%) patients utilized an electronic communication tool, and 36 (78%) utilized low-technology communication strategies during the preoperative period. A total of 32 (70%) patients were documented as using no-technology or speech-enhancement strategies during the acute hospitalization. Conclusions Multidisciplinary tracheostomy teams should consider consultation to speech-language pathologists for patients prior to tracheostomy placement to assess for utility of high-technology, low-technology, and no-technology augmentative and alternative communication strategies. Level of evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1817-1822, 2020.

Purpose This study aims to (1) describe the Predoctoral Implant Club at UIC (PIC-UIC) mentoring model while providing a rationale for the program and (2) investigate PIC members’ perception about the club and prosthodontics in general via a questionnaire and focus group discussion. Materials and Methods A survey to investigate PIC members’ perception regarding the club was distributed at a meeting. The survey consisted of questions about the members’ prior exposure to prosthodontics, faculty, and residents; current exposure to and perceptions of prosthodontics; future outcomes from membership; and possible improvements to PIC-UIC. Four student members of PIC-UIC participated in a focus group discussion about their exposure to prosthodontics during each year of their training, their exposure to prosthodontics following PIC-UIC membership, including rotations in the advanced prosthodontic clinic, mentorships by prosthodontic faculty and residents, and attendance at the American College of Prosthodontists Annual Session. Results Following PIC-UIC membership, students indicated an increased exposure to prosthodontics and prosthodontic faculty. More than a third of the respondents indicated that they are “likely” to consider a prosthodontic residency after having joined PIC-UIC. Almost two-thirds of the respondents indicated that they would recommend PIC to students at other universities and believed their understanding of the prosthodontic specialty has increased. Students who participated in the focus group agreed they had little exposure to prosthodontics, prosthodontic faculty, and advanced restorative procedures in the beginning of their dental education. They felt that involvement in PIC-UIC was a valuable experience that helped them consider or reinforced their decision to pursue prosthodontics as a career. Conclusions PIC-UIC increased predoctoral students’ interest in prosthodontics. Involving prosthodontic faculty and residents in mentoring and educational activities was evaluated positively by students. PIC-UIC may serve as a pipeline program for predoctoral students at other dental schools.

Overt dental disease is a distinguishing comorbidity associated with methamphetamine abuse, necessitating the need for special management to maximize treatment benefits. As this highly addictive stimulant increases in popularity, it has become imperative that clinicians are equipped to thoughtfully provide comprehensive care for these patients. This article reviews the impact of methamphetamine to systemic and oral health and proposes a comprehensive treatment plan and sequence for the methamphetamine-dependent patient. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended. Destructive oral and psychological changes must be identified and controlled. A thorough risk assessment, caries control, and preventative plan should be established before initiating prosthodontic treatment. Patient motivation, support, and a timely recall schedule are integral for dental longevity.