Search

Background The prognostic impact of improvement in health-related quality of life (QoL) and its relation to response in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients remains unknown. Aim To assess the correspondence between response to CRT and improvements in QoL and to verify if a change in QoL after pacing influences outcome in CRT patients. Methods Ninety-seven participants of the Triple-Site Versus Standard Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trial (TRUST CRT) randomized trial, in New York Heart Association class III-IV, QRS width ≥ 120 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and significant mechanical dyssynchrony were included. Subjects filled out the Minnesota-QoL questionnaire prior to and 6 months after CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation. Data on major adverse cardiac events (MACEs: death, heart failure hospitalization, heart transplant) collected within the next 2.5 years and adjudicated blindly constituted the censoring variables. Results Within the first 6 months of resynchronization QoL improved in 81%, while worsening in 19% of patients. Clinical response, but not the echocardiographic one, was associated with improved QoL. During subsequent 2.5 years MACEs occurred in 37% of patients (23% died). Subjects without QoL improvement were significantly (both P < 0.05) more prone to experience MACE (61% vs 32%) and die (44% vs 18%) within the follow-up. Unimproved QoL increased the probability of future MACE by 2.7 times (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.26–5.83; P = 0.01) and death by 3.2 times (95% CI: 1.23–8.32; P = 0.02) independently from clinical and echocardiographic response. Conclusions Clinical response, but not the echocardiographic one, was associated with improved QoL in CRT recipients. These preliminary data suggest that lack of improvement in QoL after CRT was associated with a strongly unfavorable prognosis, regardless of functional or echocardiographic response. Our results merit further studies with a larger number of patients.

BACKGROUND Metastases to the meninges from prostatic cancer are rare, accounting for less than 0.5% of all solid tumor cases. Management for patients with leptomeningeal metastases of various histologic types includes intrathecal chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but the prognosis is poor. Therefore, the identification of selected patients for whom effective therapy exists is of paramount importance. METHODS A patient with adenocarcinoma of the prostate presented with leptomeningeal metastases as his first manifestation of metastatic disease. RESULTS Androgen blockade was initiated with flutamide and ketoconazole. After 5 days of therapy, leuprolide acetate depot was substituted for ketoconazole. The patient responded to therapy and remained asymptomatic with a normal serum prostate-specific antigen levels at 16-plus months with no further evidence of malignant cells in spinal fluid from repeated lumbar punctures. CONCLUSION Patients with hormone-naive metastatic prostatic carcinoma manifested as carcinomatous meningitis should be considered for hormonal ablative therapy. This is preferred to the use of intrathecal chemotherapy, which has limited efficacy.