Search

Sleep apnea (SA) is potentially a modifiable risk factor for dementia. However, its associations to specific aetiologies of dementia remain uncertain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies investigating the association between sleep apnea and specific aetiologies of dementia, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Lewy body dementia (LBD), vascular dementia (VaD), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) was performed. The use of biomarkers to support clinical diagnoses in eligible studies was collected. Eleven studies were included, comprising 1,333,424 patients. Patients with sleep apnea had an increased risk of developing any type of neurocognitive disorder (HR: 1.43 [95% CI 1.26-1.62]), Alzheimer's disease (HR: 1.28 [95% CI 1.16-1.41]), and Parkinson's disease (HR: 1.54 [95% CI 1.30-1.84]). No statistically significant association was found for vascular dementia. One study reported a two-fold increased risk for Lewy body dementia (HR: 2.06 [95% CI 1.45-2.91]). No studies investigated the risk for frontotemporal dementia and none of the studies reported results pertaining to biomarkers. Sleep apnea is associated with a significantly increased risk of dementia, particularly for Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease, but not for vascular dementia. Future studies should look at the impact of sleep apnea on specific dementia biomarkers.

AIMS Bromocriptine is thought to facilitate left ventricular (LV) recovery in peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) through inhibition of prolactin secretion. However, this potential therapeutic effect remains controversial and was incompletely studied in diverse populations. METHODS AND RESULTS Consecutive women with new-onset PPCM (n = 76) between 1994 and 2015 in Quebec, Canada, were classified according to treatment (n = 8, 11%) vs. no treatment (n = 68, 89%) with bromocriptine. We assessed LV functional recovery at mid-term (6 months) and long-term (last follow-up) and compared outcomes among groups. Women treated with bromocriptine experienced better mid-term left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery from 23 ± 10% at baseline to 55 ± 12% at 6 months, compared with a change from 30 ± 12% at baseline to 45 ± 13% at 6 months in women treated with standard medical therapy (P interaction

Background Despite significant advances in durable mechanical support survival, infectious complications remain the most common adverse event after ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation and the leading cause of early death after transplantation. In this study, we aim to describe our local infectious epidemiology and review short-term survival and infectious incidence rates in the post-transplantation period and assess risk factors for infectious episodes after transplantation. Methods Retrospective single-center study of all consecutive adult heart transplant patients from 2008 to 2017. Survival data were estimated and summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method. We quantified and evaluated the difference in the incidence rate between patients with and without infection using a Fine-Gray model. The outcome of interest is the time to first infection diagnosis with post-transplant death as the competing event. Results Among 278 heart transplant patients, 74 (26.5%) underwent LVAD implantation. Twenty-one patients (28.3%) developed an infection while supported by an LVAD. When compared to patients supported by an LVAD without a preceding infection, BMI was significantly greater (31.2 vs 27.8 kg/m2 , P = .03). Median follow-up post-transplantation was 3.01 years. Significant risk factors for the competing risk regression for infection after heart transplantation include LVAD infection (HR 1.94, [95% CI] 1.11-3.39, P = .020) and recipient COPD (HR 2.14, [95% CI] 1.39-3.32, P = .001) when adjusted for recipient age, gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and body mass index. Conclusions Patients with LVAD-related infection had a significantly increased risk of infectious complications after heart transplantation. Further research on the avoidance of induction agents and reduced maintenance immunosuppression in this patient population is warranted.

Blood Pressure and Atrial Fibrillation Background Hypertension is an established risk factor for new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the relationship between blood pressure and recurrent AF is less well understood. Methods and Results A pooled analysis of patient-level data from AFFIRM and AF-CHF trials was conducted on all 2,715 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF, 68 ± 8 years, 66% male, randomized to rhythm control and followed for 40.6 ± 16.5 months. We assessed the impact of a baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP; 140 mmHg [N = 777]) on recurrent AF and proportion of time spent in AF. In patients with LVEF >40% (N = 1,719), SBP was not associated with recurrent AF in multivariate regression analyses (P = 0.752). In contrast, in patients with LVEF ≤40% (N = 996), the AF recurrence rate was higher in those with an SBP >140 mmHg compared to 120–140 mmHg (hazard ratio 1.47; 95% CI [1.12–1.93], P = 0.005). The rate of recurrent AF was similar in patients with SBP 40% (P = 0.645). However, in patients with LVEF ≤40%, the adjusted mean proportion of time spent in AF was 17.2% if SBP was 140 mmHg (P = 0.025). Conclusion Systolic blood pressure is an important determinant of recurrent AF and overall AF burden in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF≤40%) but not in those with preserved ventricular function.

Aims To investigate the association between baseline systolic blood pressure levels and mortality in patients with AF with or without LV dysfunction. Hypertension leads to cardiovascular disease but, in specific groups, low blood pressure has been associated with a paradoxical increase in mortality. In patients with AF and heart failure, the relationship between blood pressure and death remains largely unknown. Methods and results We conducted a post-hoc combined analysis on pooled data from AFFIRM and AF-CHF trials and assessed the relationship between baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mortality and hospitalizations. Patients were classified according to LVEF (>40%, ≤40%) and baseline SBP ( 140 mmHg). A total of 5436 patients with non-permanent AF were followed for 41 ± 16 months. In patients with LVEF >40%, baseline SBP was not related to mortality using multivariate Cox regression analyses to adjust for baseline differences (P = 0.563). In contrast, in patients with LVEF ≤40% (n = 1980), SBP 140 mmHg were both associated with a significant increase in total mortality compared with SBP 120–140 mmHg [hazard ratio (HR) 1.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41–2.17; and HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.04–1.90, respectively]. Hospitalizations were unrelated to SBP regardless of LVEF. Conclusions Mortality is modulated by baseline SBP levels in patients with AF and depressed EF but not in patients with normal EF. Targeted therapy of AF patients based on SBP merits further prospective investigation.