Search

Twenty percent of patients with high-tumor-burden (HTB) follicular lymphoma (FL) develop progression/relapse of disease (POD) within 24 months of frontline immunochemotherapy. Unfortunately, about 50% of these patients die within 5 years since POD event. Rituximab maintenance was proven to reduce relapse rate in responding FL, but its role on preventing POD was not defined. We analyzed 1360 HTB-FL patients from the Czech Lymphoma Study Group registry treated with frontline rituximab-containing regimen. Of those, 950 cases received rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and achieved complete or partial remission: 712 patients received rituximab maintenance (MAINT) and 238 were a historical observational cohort (OBS). We have proposed a modified POD24 (mPOD24) endpoint for the chemosensitive patients calculated from the end-of-induction (EOI). Survival rates since EOI were as follows: 5-year overall survival (OS) 86.2% versus 94.5% in the OBS and MAINT groups, respectively (

We evaluated responses to the treatment and long-term outcomes of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib as first-line treatment in routine clinical setting from two countries with centralized tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment. We assessed prognostic significance of European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2006- and 2009-defined responses and the prognostic value of molecular responses at defined time points on 5-year survivals. Among the cumulative rates of incidence of hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular responses and all important survival parameters, we evaluated the prognostic significance of different BCR-ABL transcript-level ratios (≤1%; >1%-≤10%; >10%) at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months (n = 199). The ELN optimal response criteria and their predictive role were significantly beneficial for event-free survival at all given time points. We found significant improvement in survivals of patients with BCR-ABL lower than 10% in the 6th and 12th months. Significantly better outcome was found in patients who achieved major molecular response (MMR) in the 12th month. The cumulative incidences of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and MMR were significantly associated with the molecular response in the 3rd month. The ELN response criteria and their predictive role were helpful at given time points; however, the 2009 definition did not significantly alter the prognostic accuracy compared with that of the 2006 definition. The significant value was observed for cytogenetic responses at the 6th and 12th month. Moreover, progression-free and event-free survivals were improved with MMR at the 12th month.

Overall 42 patients (pts) transplanted in hematological CR1 were retrospectively analyzed. Median follow-up was 15 months (range 2-77). The expression of WT1 gene was measured according to the European Leukaemia Net recommendations. At the time of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) 29 pts were WT1-negative and 13 pts were WT1-positive. In the univariate analysis, significantly better results were observed in the group of WT1 neg in terms of progression-free survival (in three yr 77% vs. 27%, p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the only significant feature in terms of better OS was WT1 negativity (p = 0.029). Our results show that minimal residual disease status measured by quantitative assessment of WT1 gene in acute myeloid leukemia pts in CR1 significantly affects their future prognosis after allo-SCT.

Objectives: The impact of modern prognostic markers on clinical course of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in everyday practice has been not yet well-defined, especially in large series of patients. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to assess the influence of conventional as well as modern prognostic factors on overall survival (OS) and time to therapy (TTT) of CLL patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of all patients consecutively entered into the databases of five large academic centers in the Czech Republic. The total of 1300 patients was included in the analysis. Results and conclusion: Through the use of uniparametric analysis, it was determined that gender, clinical stage Rai II-IV, unmutated IgVH status, 17p deletion (for both 5% and 20% cut-off), 11q deletion, ZAP-70 positivity and high expression of CD38 had significant negative influence on OS. TTT was significantly influenced by gender, Rai stage, IgVH status, 11q deletion, 17p deletion, 13q deletion and by CD38 expression. Multiparametric analysis revealed that OS was significantly influenced by gender, age, IgVH status, and 17p deletion. If only patients who died of CLL were included, gender, age, Rai stage, IgVH status, and deletion 17p had significant influence on OS. Based on our results, the examination of biological prognostic markers can give an insight into the possible disease evolution in daily clinical practice. Biological prognostic markers are however not ready (maybe except deletion 17p in younger patients) to be used for guidance of therapy at least outside of clinical trials.

Our objective was to study the kinetics of circulating endothelial cells (EC) and endothelial precursor cells (EPC) in hematological patients during chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantion (ASCT). Eighteen newly diagnosed patients and 17 patients undergoing ASCT were studied and compared to healthy controls. ECs were evaluated as CD146+CD31+Lin- cells, while EPCs were evaluated as CD34+CD133+Lin-, or CD34+VEGFR2+Lin- cells, or CFU-En colony forming units. Numbers of these cells were evaluated before and after treatment, and, in patients treated with ASCT, during mobilization of hematopoietic progenitors. Both newly diagnosed patients and patients before ASCT had significantly higher number of CD146+CD31+Lin- cells and significantly lower number of CFU-En colonies than healthy controls. These parameters did not return to normal for at least 3 months after chemotherapy or ASCT. Numbers of CFU-En did not correlate either with numbers of CD34+CD133+Lin- cells or with numbers of CD34+VEGFR2+Lin- cells but they did correlate with numbers of CD4+ lymphocytes and NK cells. In conclusion, we have found that hematological patients have higher number of EC and lower numbers of CFU-En than healthy controls and that these parameters do not return to normal after short-term follow-up. Furthermore, our observations support emerging data that CFU-En represent cell population different from flowcytometrically defined EC and endothelial precursors and that their development requires cooperation of monocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes. However, cells forming CFU-En express endothelial surface markers and can contribute to proper endothelial function by NO production.

To explore the safety and effectiveness of the individually determined application granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT).The administration of G-CSF from day +5 (arm A) was compared in a randomised, controlled trial with delayed, individually determined administration (G-CSF started when WBCor= 0.5 x 10(9)/L and ANCor= 0.1 x 10(9)/L or at day +10; arm B), and with placebo (arm C).One hundred and six patients, median age 45 (range 21-64), all with malignant lymphoma treated with BEAM chemotherapy were analysed. A significant difference in the time to neutrophil engraftment and in the duration of neutropenia0.5 x 10(9)/L and1.0 x 10(9)/L was observed between the arms (P = 0.04-0.0001) with a 1-d prolongation of the median durations in arm B in comparison with arm A but a 2-4-d prolongation in the placebo arm C in comparison with arm B. The median number and range of days to neutrophil engraftment0.5 x 10(9)/L after graft re-infusion was 10 (9-14) in arm A; 11 (9-19) in arm B; and 14 (10-30) in arm C (P0.0001). Engraftment of platelets to20 x 10(9)/L and50 x 10(9)/L was significantly delayed in the arms using G-CSF in comparison with placebo (P = 0.04-0.002) without any increase in bleeding or in transfusion requirement. There was no difference in the incidence and duration of transplant-related complications and their treatment between the arms.Our study has confirmed the safety of individually determined administration of G-CSF. The optimal timing of G-CSF application after ASCT in patients with good-quality grafts is shortly before expected spontaneous engraftment.