Search

Abstract According to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, EFSA has reviewed the maximum residue levels (MRLs) currently established at European level for the pesticide active substance metamitron. To assess the occurrence of metamitron residues in plants, processed commodities, rotational crops and livestock, EFSA considered the conclusions derived in the framework of Directive 91/414/EEC as well as the import tolerances and European authorisations reported by Member States (including the supporting residues data). Based on the assessment of the available data, MRL proposals were derived and a consumer risk assessment was carried out. Although no apparent risk to consumers was identified, some information required by the regulatory framework was missing. Hence, the consumer risk assessment is considered indicative only and some MRL proposals derived by EFSA still require further consideration by risk managers.

Metamitron (Meta), an herbicide, and fenhexamid (Fen), a fungicide, are authorized by the European Union to be used in agriculture. This article reports theoretical calculations about Meta and Fen in interaction with a clay surface: a Ca-montmorillonite (Mont). Conformational searches have been performed thanks to Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics simulations from which geometries have been extracted. Interaction and adsorption energies have been calculated for isomers of Meta or Fen in interaction with Mont to understand the relative stability of various kinds of complexation. Substantial adsorption energies are comparable for Meta and Fen: around -40 kcal/mol. For Fen-Mont, the CO monodentate family is surprisingly the lowest in energy. Moreover, the 10 lowest-energy isomers involve complexation on Fen carbonyl oxygens. The Meta-Mont lowest-energy family, N-N, does not involve π delocalization breaking within Meta. At the same time, the stronger the interaction energy is, the larger the structural modifications within Mont are, particularly concerning the interacting cation distance to the surface. The non-negligible charge transfer and the magnitude of the adsorption energy speak in favor of the chemisorption of the pesticide on the surface. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)