Search

Many photo immunological studies have used UV radiation sources that emit nonsolar UV spectral energy and UV doses based on nonimmunological endpoints, e.g. erythema and skin edema. Interpretation of these data has led to misunderstanding when extrapolated to hypothetical effects in humans exposed to solar UV. The purpose of this study was to: (1) establish UV dose response relationships for murine skin edema and immunosuppression, and (2) determine how different UV spectra affect these relationships. Back skin and ear minimum edema doses (MEdD) for Kodacel-filtered FS20 sunlamp UV (290-400 nm) were greater than two-fold higher than those for unfiltered FS20 sunlamp UV (250-400 nm). Xenon are solar simulator UV (295-400 nm) MEdD were > 10-fold higher than those for unfiltered sunlamp UV. Back skin and ear MEdD differed two- to five-fold between C3H/HeN, SWR/J and HRA/Skh-1 mice. The minimum immunosuppression doses (MISD) in C3H mice showed similar UV source spectrum dependence. The solar simulator UV MISD was 5.4- and 1.5-fold higher than for unfiltered and Kodacel-filtered sunlamp UV MISD, respectively. Furthermore, MISD were from 3- to 50-fold higher than the MEdD for the three UV sources. The UV bioeffectiveness spectra indicated that UVC energy (250-290 nm) contributed 12% and 18%, respectively, of the total skin edema and immunosuppression UV energy. These data demonstrate the variability in UV sensitivity among mouse strains, the significant differences between murine MEdD and MISD and how these differences are influenced by nonsolar regions (below 295 nm) of the UV spectrum.

Exposure to subcarcinogenic doses of ultraviolet (UV) radiation suppresses tumor immunity, thus permitting the emergence and growth of highly immunogenic skin cancers in mice. Sunscreens prevent UV carcinogenesis; however, there are conflicting reports regarding their ability to block UV-induced tumor immune suppression. In this study we critically evaluated the effects of UV spectrum and dose on the tumor immune protective capacity of 4 marketed sunscreen lotions with labeled sun protection factors (SPF) 8–45. Effective tumor immune suppression doses (TISD), i.e., the lowest dose tested to induce outgrowth of transplanted nonmelanoma skin tumors in 100% of UV-exposed C3H mice, were established for 3 different UV sources. TISD were significantly lower for unfiltered (FS) and Kodacel-filtered (KFS) UVB-type FS20 sunlamps compared with a filtered xenon arc lamp solar simulator. Sunscreen tumor immune protection levels matched those predicted by their labeled SPF when sunscreen-protected mice were exposed to a fixed TISD of solar simulator UV radiation. SPF 30 and 45 sunscreens also blocked activation of tumor antigen-specific suppressor T-lymphocytes in mice exposed to solar simulator UV radiation. In comparison, sunscreens with SPF ≥ 15 provided partial to complete protection, as measured by tumor incidence, for mice exposed to UV radiation from KFS. All sunscreens tested reduced tumor growth rates in KFS UV-exposed mice. None of the sunscreens tested provided measurable tumor immune protection for mice exposed to FS UV radiation. Thus, sunscreen lotions provide an extent of tumor immune protection consistent with their labeled SPF when appropriate testing conditions are employed. Int. J. Cancer, 71:94–102, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.