Search

Background: Oxycodone is increasingly being used in combination with pregabalin. Pregabalin use is prevalent in opioid-dependent individuals. A high number of deaths caused by the co-use of gabapentinoids and opioids occur. It is not known whether pregabalin affects concentrations of oxycodone or morphine in the central nervous system., Methods: Effects of pregabalin on acute oxycodone or morphine-induced antinociception, tolerance and sedation were studied using tail-flick, hot plate and rotarod tests in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Concentrations of pregabalin, opioids and their major metabolites in the brain were quantified by mass spectrometry., Results: In the hot plate test, morphine (2.5 mg/kg, s.c.) caused antinociception of 28% maximum possible effect (MPE), whereas pregabalin (50 mg/kg, i.p.) produced 8-10% MPE. Co-administration of pregabalin and morphine resulted in antinociception of 63% MPE. Oxycodone (0.6 mg/kg s.c.) produced antinociception of 18% MPE, which increased to 39% MPE after co-administration with pregabalin. When pregabalin 10 mg/kg was administered before oxycodone (0.6 mg/kg, s.c.) or morphine (2.5 mg/kg), only the effect of oxycodone was potentiated in the tail-flick and the hot plate tests. Brain concentrations of the opioids, their major metabolites and pregabalin were unchanged. Pregabalin co-administration (50 mg/kg, i.p., once daily) did not prevent the development of morphine tolerance., Conclusions: Pregabalin potentiated antinociceptive and sedative effects of oxycodone and morphine in acute nociception. Co-administration of pregabalin with the opioids did not affect the brain concentrations of oxycodone or morphine. Pregabalin did not prevent morphine tolerance., (© 2015 European Pain Federation - EFIC®)

Repaglinide is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 and 3A4. Gemfibrozil has the effect of increasing the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of repaglinide eightfold. We studied the effect of dosing interval on the extent of the gemfibrozil-repaglinide interaction. In a randomized five-phase crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers ingested 0.25 mg repaglinide, with or without gemfibrozil pretreatment. Plasma repaglinide, gemfibrozil, their metabolites, and blood glucose were measured. When the last dose of 600 mg gemfibrozil was ingested simultaneously with repaglinide, or 3, 6, or 12 h before, it increased the AUC(0-infinity) of repaglinide 7.0-, 6.5-, 6.2- and 5.0-fold, respectively (P < 0.001). The peak repaglinide concentration increased approximately twofold (P < 0.001), and the half-life was prolonged from 1.2 h to 2-3 h (P < 0.001) during all the gemfibrozil phases. The drug interaction effects persisted at least 12 h after gemfibrozil was administered, although plasma gemfibrozil and gemfibrozil 1-O-beta-glucuronide concentrations were only 5 and 10% of their peak values, respectively. The long-lasting interaction is likely caused by mechanism-based inhibition of CYP2C8 by gemfibrozil glucuronide.

Background and Objective: Repaglinide is an antidiabetic drug metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2 C 8 and 3A4, and it appears to be a substrate of the hepatic uptake transporter organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1). We studied the effects of cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin), an inhibitor of CYP3A4 and OATP1B1, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of repaglinide., Methods: In a randomized crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers took 100 mg cyclosporine or placebo orally at 8 pm on day 1 and at 8 am on day 2. At 9 am on day 2, they ingested a single 0.25-mg dose of repaglinide. Concentrations of plasma and urine repaglinide and its metabolites (M), blood cyclosporine, and blood glucose were measured for 12 hours. The subjects were genotyped for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in CYP2C8, CYP3A5, SLCO1B1 (encoding OATP1B1), and ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein). The effect of cyclosporine on repaglinide metabolism was studied in human liver microsomes in vitro., Results: During the cyclosporine phase, the mean peak repaglinide plasma concentration was 175% (range, 56%--365%; P=.013) and the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC0--infinity] was 244% (range, 119%--533%; P<.001) of that in the placebo phase. The amount of unchanged repaglinide and its metabolites M2 and M4 excreted in urine were raised 2.7--fold, 7.5--fold, and 5.0--fold, respectively, by cyclosporine (P<.001). The amount of M1 excreted in urine remained unchanged, but cyclosporine reduced the ratio of M1 to repaglinide by 62% (P<.001). Cyclosporine had no significant effect on the elimination half-life or renal clearance of repaglinide. Although the mean blood glucose-lowering effect of repaglinide was unaffected in this low-dose study with frequent carbohydrate intake, the subject with the greatest pharmacokinetic interaction had the greatest increase in blood glucose-lowering effect. The effect of cyclosporine on repaglinide AUC0-infinity was 42% lower in subjects with the SLCO1B1 521TC genotype than in subjects with the 521TT (reference) genotype (P=.047). In vitro, cyclosporine inhibited the formation of M1 (IC50 [concentration of inhibitor to cause 50% inhibition of original enzyme activity], 0.2 micromol/L) and M2 (IC50, 4.3 micromol/L) but had no effect on M4., Conclusions: Cyclosporine raised the plasma concentrations of repaglinide, probably by inhibiting its CYP3A4-catalyzed biotransformation and OATP1B1-mediated hepatic uptake. Coadministration of cyclosporine may enhance the blood glucose-lowering effect of repaglinide and increase the risk of hypoglycemia.

Objectives: Our objective was to evaluate the effects of itraconazole and grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of the beta-adrenergic receptor-blocking agent celiprolol in healthy volunteers., Methods: In a randomized 3-phase crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers took itraconazole 200 mg orally or placebo twice a day or 200 mL grapefruit juice 3 times a day for 2 days. On the morning of day 3, 1 hour after ingestion of itraconazole, placebo, or grapefruit juice, each subject ingested 100 mg celiprolol with 200 mL of water (placebo and itraconazole phases) or grapefruit juice. In addition, 200 mL of water or grapefruit juice was ingested 4 and 10 hours after celiprolol intake. The plasma concentrations of celiprolol, itraconazole, and hydroxyitraconazole and the excretion of celiprolol into urine were measured up to 33 hours after dosing. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rate were recorded with subjects in a sitting position before the administration of celiprolol and 2, 4, 6, and 10 hours later., Results: During the itraconazole phase, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 33 hours [AUC(0-33)] of celiprolol was 80% greater (P <.05) than in the placebo phase. During the grapefruit juice phase, the mean AUC(0-33) and peak plasma concentration values of celiprolol were reduced to about 13% (P <.001) and 5% (P <.001) of the respective placebo phase values. The cumulative excretion into urine of celiprolol was increased by 59% by itraconazole (P <.05) and decreased by 85% by grapefruit juice (P <.001). Hemodynamic variables did not differ between the phases., Conclusions: Itraconazole almost doubles but grapefruit juice greatly reduces plasma concentrations of celiprolol. The itraconazole-celiprolol interaction most likely resulted from increased absorption of celiprolol possibly as a result of P-glycoprotein inhibition in the intestine. The reduced celiprolol concentrations during the grapefruit juice phase were probably caused by physicochemical factors that interfered with celiprolol absorption, although other mechanisms cannot be excluded. The grapefruit juice-celiprolol interaction is probably of clinical relevance.

Background: Concomitant use of fibrates with statins has been associated with an increased risk of myopathy, but the underlying mechanism of this adverse reaction remains unclear. Our aim was to study the effects of bezafibrate and gemfibrozil on the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin., Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, 3-phase crossover study. Eleven healthy volunteers took 400 mg/day bezafibrate, 1200 mg/day gemfibrozil, or placebo for 3 days. On day 3, each subject ingested a single 40 mg dose of lovastatin. Plasma concentrations of lovastatin, lovastatin acid, gemfibrozil, and bezafibrate were measured up to 24 hours., Results: Gemfibrozil markedly increased the plasma concentrations of lovastatin acid, without affecting those of the parent lovastatin compared with placebo. During the gemfibrozil phase, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours [AUC(0-24)] of lovastatin acid was 280% (range, 131% to 1184%; P < .001) and the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was 280% (range, 123% to 1042%; P < .05) of the corresponding value during the placebo phase. Bezafibrate had no statistically significant effect on the AUC(0-24) or Cmax of lovastatin or lovastatin acid compared with placebo., Conclusions: Gemfibrozil markedly increases plasma concentrations of lovastatin acid, but bezafibrate does not. The increased risk of myopathy observed during concomitant treatment with statins and fibrates may be partially of a pharmacokinetic origin. The risk of developing myopathy during concomitant therapy with lovastatin and a fibrate may be smaller with bezafibrate than with gemfibrozil.

Objective: Our objective was to study the effects of fluconazole and fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glimepiride, a new sulfonylurea antidiabetic drug., Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, three-phase crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers took 200 mg of fluconazole once daily (400 mg on day 1), 100 mg of fluvoxamine once daily, or placebo once daily for 4 days. On day 4, a single oral dose of 0.5 mg of glimepiride was administered. Plasma glimepiride and blood glucose concentrations were measured up to 12 hours., Results: In the fluconazole phase, the mean total area under the plasma concentration-time curve of glimepiride was 238% (P <.0001) and the peak plasma concentration was 151% (P <.0001) of the respective control value. The mean elimination half-life of glimepiride was prolonged from 2.0 to 3.3 hours (P <.0001) by fluconazole. In the fluvoxamine phase, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve of glimepiride was not significantly different from that in the placebo phase. However, the mean peak plasma concentration of glimepiride was 143% (P <.05) of the control and the elimination half-life was prolonged from 2.0 to 2.3 hours (P <.01) by fluvoxamine. Fluconazole and fluvoxamine did not cause statistically significant changes in the effects of glimepiride on blood glucose concentrations., Conclusions: Fluconazole considerably increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of glimepiride and prolonged its elimination half-life. This was probably caused by inhibition of the cytochrome P-450 2C9-mediated biotransformation of glimepiride by fluconazole. Concomitant use of fluconazole with glimepiride may increase the risk of hypoglycemia as much as would a 2- to 3-fold increase in the dose of glimepiride. Fluvoxamine moderately increased the plasma concentrations and slightly prolonged the elimination half-life of glimepiride.

Background: Rifampin (rifampicin) is a potent inducer of several cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, including CYP3A4. The cholesterol-lowering drug simvastatin has an extensive first-pass metabolism, and it is partially metabolized by CYP3A4. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin., Methods: In a randomized cross-over study with two phases and a washout of 4 weeks, 10 healthy volunteers received a 5-day pretreatment with rifampin (600 mg daily) or placebo. On day 6, a single 40-mg dose of simvastatin was administered orally. Plasma concentrations of simvastatin and its active metabolite simvastatin acid were measured up to 12 hours with a sensitive liquid chromatography-ion spray tandem mass spectrometry method., Results: Rifampin decreased the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve of simvastatin and simvastatin acid by 87% (P < .001) and 93% (P < .001), respectively. Also the peak concentrations of both simvastatin and simvastatin acid were reduced greatly (by 90%) by rifampin (P < .001). On the other hand, rifampin had no significant effect on the elimination half-life of simvastatin or simvastatin acid., Conclusions: Rifampin greatly decreases the plasma concentrations of simvastatin and simvastatin acid. Because the elimination half-life of simvastatin was not affected by rifampin, induction of the CYP3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism of simvastatin in the intestine and the liver probably explains this interaction. Concomitant use of potent inducers of CYP3A4 can lead to a considerably reduced cholesterol-lowering efficacy of simvastatin.