Search

COVID-19 is a complex disease, and many difficulties are faced today especially in the proper choice of pharmacological treatments. The role of antiviral agents for COVID-19 is still being investigated and evidence for immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory drugs is quite conflicting, whereas the use of corticosteroids is supported by robust evidence. The use of heparins in hospitalized critically ill patients is preferred over other anticoagulants. There are conflicting data on the use of convalescent plasma and vitamin D. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), many vaccines are in Phase III clinical trials, and some of them have already received marketing approval in European countries and in the United States. In conclusion, drug repurposing has represented the main approach recently used in the treatment of patients with COVID-19. At this moment, analysis of efficacy and safety data of drugs and vaccines used in real-life context is strongly needed. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on The second wave: are we any closer to efficacious pharmacotherapy for COVID 19? (BJP 75th Anniversary). To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v179.10/issuetoc., (© 2021 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Since December 2019 SARS-Cov-2 was found responsible for the disease COVID-19, which has spread worldwide. No specific therapies/vaccines are yet available for the treatment of COVID-19. Drug repositioning may offer a strategy and a number of drugs have been repurposed, including lopinavir/ritonavir, remdesivir, favipiravir and tocilizumab. This paper describes the main pharmacological properties of such drugs administered to patients with COVID-19, focusing on their antiviral, immune-modulatory and/or anti-inflammatory actions. Where available, data from clinical trials involving patients with COVID-19 are reported. Preliminary clinical trials seem to support their benefit. However, such drugs in COVID-19 patients have peculiar safety profiles. Thus, adequate clinical trials are necessary for these compounds. Nevertheless, while waiting for effective preventive measures i.e. vaccines, many clinical trials on drugs belonging to different therapeutic classes are currently underway. Their results will help us in defining the best way to treat COVID-19 and reducing its symptoms and complications. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on The Pharmacology of COVID-19. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v177.21/issuetoc., (© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Background and Purpose: Doxorubicin is a highly effective anticancer drug, but its clinical application is hampered by cardiotoxicity. Asymptomatic diastolic dysfunction can be the earliest manifestation of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. Therefore, a search for therapeutic intervention that can interfere with early manifestations and possibly prevent later development of cardiotoxicity is warranted. Increased doxorubicin-dependent ROS may explain, in part, Ca 2+ and Na + overload that contributes to diastolic dysfunction and development of heart failure. Therefore, we tested whether the administration of ranolazine, a selective blocker of late Na + current, immediately after completing doxorubicin therapy, could affect diastolic dysfunction and interfere with the progression of functional decline., Experimental Approach: Fischer 344 rats received a cumulative dose of doxorubicin of 15 mg·kg -1 over a period of 2 weeks. After the assessment of diastolic dysfunction, the animals were treated with ranolazine (80 mg·kg -1 , daily) for the following 4 weeks., Key Results: While diastolic and systolic function progressively deteriorated in doxorubicin-treated animals, treatment with ranolazine relieved diastolic dysfunction and prevented worsening of systolic function, decreasing mortality. Ranolazine lowered myocardial NADPH oxidase 2 expression and oxidative/nitrative stress. Expression of the Na + /Ca 2+ exchanger 1 and Na v 1.5 channels was reduced and of the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca 2+ -ATPase 2 protein was increased. In addition, ranolazine lowered doxorubicin-induced hyper-phosphorylation and oxidation of Ca 2+ /calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II, and decreased myocardial fibrosis., Conclusions and Implications: Ranolazine, by the increased Na + influx, induced by doxorubicin, altered cardiac Ca 2+ and Na + handling and attenuated diastolic dysfunction induced by doxorubicin, thus preventing the progression of cardiomyopathy., Linked Articles: This article is part of a themed section on New Insights into Cardiotoxicity Caused by Chemotherapeutic Agents. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v174.21/issuetoc., (© 2017 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Background and Purpose: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a systemic syndrome driven by co-morbidities, and its pathophysiology is poorly understood. Several studies suggesting that dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) might be involved in the pathophysiology of heart failure have prompted experimental and clinical investigations of DPP4 inhibitors in the cardiovascular system. Here we have investigated whether the DPP4 inhibitor sitagliptin affected the progression of HFpEF independently of its effects on glycaemia., Experimental Approach: Seven-week-old Dahl salt-sensitive rats were fed a high-salt diet for 5 weeks to induce hypertension. Then the rats continued with the high-salt diet and were treated with either sitagliptin (10 mg·kg -1 ) or vehicle for the following 8 weeks. Blood pressure and cardiac function were measured in vivo. Histochemical and molecular biology analyses of myocardium were used to assay cytokines, fibrotic markers, DPP4 and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)/GLP-1 receptor., Key Results: Treatment with sitagliptin attenuated diastolic dysfunction, reduced mortality and reduced cardiac DPP4 activity, along with increased circulating GLP-1 and myocardial expression of GLP-1 receptors. Myocardial levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6 and CCL2) were reduced. Sitagliptin treatment decreased the levels of endothelial NOS monomer, responsible for generation of ROS, while the amount of NO-producing dimeric form increased. Markers of oxidative and nitrosative stress were decreased. Moreover, increased collagen deposition and activation of pro-fibrotic signalling, inducing elevated myocardial stiffness, were attenuated by sitagliptin treatment., Conclusions and Implications: Sitagliptin positively modulated active relaxation and passive diastolic compliance by decreasing inflammation-related endothelial dysfunction and fibrosis, associated with HFpEF., Linked Articles: This article is part of a themed section on Targeting Inflammation to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Risk. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v174.22/issuetoc and http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.v82.4/issuetoc., (© 2016 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Although the antinociceptive effect of NMDA antagonists in the formalin test is well recognised, these compounds can induce adverse motor effects. The aim of this study was to identify the systemic doses of NMDA antagonists that induce analgesia without causing side effects. Male Swiss mice (30-40g) received a subcutaneous (sc) injection of 1.25% formalin (50 micro l) in the dorsal surface of the right hind-paw and, 15min before or after formalin, an ip injection of one of the following NMDA receptor antagonists: MK 801 (0.01, 0.025, and 0.05mg/kg), memantine (0.1, 0.5, and 1mg/kg), ketamine (0.125, 0.25, and 0.5mg/kg), dextromethorphan (5, 10, and 20mg/kg), and CGP 37849 (4, 6, and 8mg/kg). Pain-related behaviour (licking, lifting, favouring, shaking, and flinching of the treated paw) was recorded at 5-min intervals for 60min. The NMDA receptor antagonists significantly (p<0.01) and dose-dependently reduced, versus controls, nociceptive activity during the second phase of the formalin test (from the 20th to the 60thmin): at the highest doses, 97.6+/-0.1% with MK 801; 90.4+/-0.2% with memantine; 74.7+/-0.3% with ketamine; 92.8+/-0.4% with dextromethorphan; and 80.7+/-0.3% with CGP 37849, without affecting coordination. The rank order potency of antinociceptive activity of NMDA antagonists was: MK801>memantine>ketamine>dextromethorphan>CGP37849. The NMDA antagonists administered after formalin (during the analgesic interval) did not affect the late phase of the formalin test. In conclusion, systemic administration of NMDA receptor antagonists decreases the nociception observed during the late phase of the formalin test.

1. Pharmacological studies have suggested that A3 receptors are present on central neurons. Recently this adenosine receptor subtype has been identified in the rat and its presence in the central nervous system has been confirmed. 2. In this study we investigated the effects of acute intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injections of N6-2-(4-aminophenyl)-ethyladenosine (APNEA), a non-selective A3 adenosine receptor agonist, on arterial blood pressure (ABP) and heart rate (HR), after treatment with 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), a selective antagonist of A1 adenosine receptors. 3. Anaesthetized rats, after DPCPX (12 microg(-1) kg i.c.v.), were treated with APNEA (0.4-4 microg kg(-1) i.c.v.) resulting in a transitory and dose-dependent decrease in arterial blood pressure without a change in heart rate. APNEA also induced hypotensive responses after i.c.v. pretreatment with aminophylline, at a dose of 20 microg kg(-1). In contrast, pretreatment 48 h before, with 4 microg kg(-1) i.c.v. of pertussis toxin reduced the hypotensive effect induced by APNEA. Administration of APNEA at a higher dose (20 microg kg(-1) i.c.v.), after DPCPX, induced a decrease in ABP of -66+/-5.4 mmHg and after 3 min a decrease in heart rate of -62+/-6.0 beats min(-1). Transection of the spinal cord abolished this significant fall in ABP, but not the decrease of HR. 4. These results suggest that a population of A3-receptors is present in the CNS, whose activation induces a decrease in blood pressure with no change of heart rate.