Search

Summary SoxR is a [2Fe-2S]-containing sensor-regulator, which is activated through oxidation by redox-active compounds (RACs). SoxRs show differential sensitivity to RACs, partly due to different redox potentials, such that Escherichia coli (Ec) SoxR with lower potential respond to broader range of RACs than Streptomyces coelicolor (Sc) SoxR. In S. coelicolor, the RACs that do not activate ScSoxR did not inhibit growth, suggesting that ScSoxR is tuned to respond to growth-inhibitory RACs. Based on sequence comparison and mutation studies, two critical amino acids around the [2Fe-2S] binding site were proposed as key determinants of sensitivity. ScSoxR-like mutation (R127L/P131V) in EcSoxR changed its sensitivity profile as ScSoxR, whereas EcSoxR-like mutation (L126R/V130P) in ScSoxR caused relaxed response. In accordance, the redox potentials of EcSoxRR127L/P131V and ScSoxRL126R/V130P were estimated to be −192 ± 8 mV and −273 ± 10 mV, respectively, approaching that of ScSoxR (−185 mV) and EcSoxR (−290 mV). Molecular dynamics simulations revealed that the R127L and P131V substitutions in EcSoxR caused more electropositive environment around [2Fe-2S], making it harder to get oxidized. This reveals a mechanism to modulate redox-potential in [Fe-S]-containing sensors by point mutations and to evolve a sensor with differential sensitivity to achieve optimal cellular physiology.

Summary SoxR from Escherichia coli and related enterobacte- ria is activated by a broad range of redox-active compounds through oxidation or nitrosylation of its (2Fe-2S) cluster. Activated SoxR then induces SoxS, which subsequently activates more than 100 genes in response. In contrast, non-enteric SoxRs directly activate their target genes in response to redox-active compounds that include endogenously produced metabolites. We compared the respon- siveness of SoxRs from Streptomyces coelicolor (ScSoxR), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PaSoxR) and E. coli (EcSoxR), all expressed in S. coelicolor, towards natural or synthetic redox-active com- pounds. EcSoxR responded to all compounds exam- ined, whereas ScSoxR was insensitive to oxidants such as paraquat (Eh −440 mV) and menadione sodium bisulphite (Eh −45 mV) and to NO generators. PaSoxR was insensitive only to some NO generators. Whole-cell EPR analysis of SoxRs expressed in E. coli revealed that the (2Fe-2S) 1+ of ScSoxR was not oxidizable by paraquat, differing from EcSoxR and PaSoxR. The mid-point redox potential of purified ScSoxR was determined to be −185 ± 10 mV, higher by ∼ 100 mV than those of EcSoxR and PaSoxR, supporting its limited response to paraquat. The overall sensitivity profile indicates that both redox potential and kinetic reactivity determine the differential responses of SoxRs towards various oxidants.

Summary Numerous thiol-reactive compounds cause oxidative stress where cells counteract by activation of survival strategies regulated by thiol-based sensors. In Streptomyces coelicolor, a model actinomycete, a sigma/antisigma pair SigR/RsrA controls the response to thiol-oxidative stress. To unravel its full physiological functions, chromatin immuno-precipitation combined with sequence and transcript analyses were employed to identify 108 SigR target genes in S. coelicolor and to predict orthologous regulons across actinomycetes. In addition to reported genes for thiol homeostasis, protein degradation and ribosome modulation, 64 additional operons were identified suggesting new functions of this global regulator. We demonstrate that SigR maintains the level and activity of the housekeeping sigma factor HrdB during thiol-oxidative stress, a novel strategy for stress responses. We also found that SigR defends cells against UV and thiol-reactive damages, in which repair UvrA takes a part. Using a refined SigR-binding sequence model, SigR orthologues and their targets were predicted in 42 actinomycetes. This revealed a conserved core set of SigR targets to function for thiol homeostasis, protein quality control, possible modulation of transcription and translation, flavin-mediated redox reactions, and Fe-S delivery. The composition of the SigR regulon reveals a robust conserved physiological mechanism to deal with thiol-oxidative stress from bacteria to human.

The soxRS regulon functions in protecting Escherichia coli cells against superoxide and nitric oxide. When SoxR is activated by oxidation of its [2Fe–2S] cluster, it increases the synthesis of SoxS, which then activates its target gene expression. How the oxidized SoxR returns to and is maintained in its reduced state has been under question. To identity genes that constitute the SoxR-reducing system, we screened an E.coli mutant library carrying a chromosomal soxSp::lacZ fusion, for constitutive mutants. Mutations mapped to two loci: the rsxABCDGE operon (named for reducer of SoxR) that is highly homologous to the rnfABCDGE operon in Rhodobacter capsulatus involved in transferring electrons to nitrogenase, and the rseC gene in the rpoE–rseABC operon. In-frame deletion of each open reading frame in the rsxABCDGE operon produced a similar constitutive phenotype. The double mutation of rsx and rseC suggested that rsxABCDGE and rseC gene products act together in the same pathway in reducing SoxR. Electron paramagnetic resonance analysis of SoxR and measurement of re-reduction kinetics support the proposal that rsx and rseC gene products constitute a reducing system for SoxR.